Of course it's possible, but I really don't think so. He is not well-educated (formally or informally), and I think he's quite sincere, but also not able to understand the complexities of the relevant legal issues and procedures. I think he's susceptible to believing the same kind of simplistic "evidence" that a lot of less-educated Trump supporters are susceptible to believing. A lot of the information he presented in his documentary/expose re election fraud ("Absolute Proof") was legitimate, but most of it was just circumstantial evidence, unaccompanied by the necessary proof-type evidence.
And the stuff from Mary Fanning, claiming to "prove" that the election process was being directly manipulated from foreign countries, by showing a map with lots of lines purporting to show internet traffic to and from Dominion machines, is just flat-out nonsense. At most, it is circumstantial evidence that at least some Dominion machines were connected to the internet while in use for voting and/or tabulation, which they weren't supposed to be. But once any computer is connected to the internet, that kind of transoceanic e-traffic is just normal, and proves nothing about the content, intention, or effects of the people or machines generating the traffic.
I've thought this as well. People like Bannon flog the hell out of his products. I'm waiting for him to release the Kraken. I feel like he's working up to it.
Is it possible he’s just riding the conservative base to sell more pillows and is revealing what he really thinks about us all?
Of course it's possible, but I really don't think so. He is not well-educated (formally or informally), and I think he's quite sincere, but also not able to understand the complexities of the relevant legal issues and procedures. I think he's susceptible to believing the same kind of simplistic "evidence" that a lot of less-educated Trump supporters are susceptible to believing. A lot of the information he presented in his documentary/expose re election fraud ("Absolute Proof") was legitimate, but most of it was just circumstantial evidence, unaccompanied by the necessary proof-type evidence.
And the stuff from Mary Fanning, claiming to "prove" that the election process was being directly manipulated from foreign countries, by showing a map with lots of lines purporting to show internet traffic to and from Dominion machines, is just flat-out nonsense. At most, it is circumstantial evidence that at least some Dominion machines were connected to the internet while in use for voting and/or tabulation, which they weren't supposed to be. But once any computer is connected to the internet, that kind of transoceanic e-traffic is just normal, and proves nothing about the content, intention, or effects of the people or machines generating the traffic.
I've thought this as well. People like Bannon flog the hell out of his products. I'm waiting for him to release the Kraken. I feel like he's working up to it.