Yep. It’s all a show to “guide” the country where they want it to go. Why do you think the UK developed a court that mirrors our own? Bc they saw how clearly they can bypass Congress/Parliment/laws they don’t like.
It is true that, in the United States, at least, we have a constitution that imposes strict limits on some powers of government. But, as we have discovered in the past century, no constitution can interpret or enforce itself; it must be interpreted by men. And if the ultimate power to interpret a constitution is given to the government’s own Supreme Court, then the inevitable tendency is for the Court to continue to place its imprimatur on ever-broader powers for its own government. Furthermore, the highly touted “checks and balances” and “separation of powers” in the American government are flimsy indeed, since in the final analysis all of these divisions are part of the same government and are governed by the same set of rulers -- Murray Rothbard
Yep. It’s all a show to “guide” the country where they want it to go. Why do you think the UK developed a court that mirrors our own? Bc they saw how clearly they can bypass Congress/Parliment/laws they don’t like.