205
Comments (25)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
45squared 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly, I’ve started following a lot of “crunchy” people on social media and all of them are against vaccines and face-masks...the people that complained about covering while BFing were virtue signaling liberal women that have no principals and screech and the “crunchy” aspect is just for show—they’ll do whatever they need to to get attention.

0
StrongIsland [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

They aren’t screaming loud enough then... and I said Mothers not People, and I meant IRL not online, I like that you’ve found that, please share those screenshots... they could help, sounds like your convinced?

1
45squared 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m talking about REAL crunchy mothers, not liberal women that fake being crunchy when they think it’s the popular thing to do and don’t actually have any real convictions other than forcing toxic feminism. To be fair, these crunchy women I follow are also pro-2A, pro-religious freedom, so it’s unfair to throw the entire “crunchy” community under the bus—there are idiots and there are also people that tend to be crunchy bc they are untrusting of our governments, big Pharma, etc. and our on “our side”

This place can be so fucking stupid with trying to place one entire group of people into a single ideology! Some military people are libtards, some are based. Some cops are libtards, some aren’t. A lot of teachers are libtards, but some are based. Trying to be all or none throws a lot of allies under the bus. Don’t be so fucking myopic—it’s a very leftist thing to do.