Our “proof” is a Facebook post of some random picture of a baby with a rash, followed up by another random comment from somewhere else that allegedly is related to the first post, then a third comment in some gibberish language.
And people believe this? Then they tell you the “mom’s” name but not the kid’s, so it’s impossible to look up yourself. Who refers to their “grandnephew” instead of just calling the kid by name, if they’re related?
If the kid died there will be an obituary. THAT is proof. This shit is nothing unless it has something else to back it up.
I found an article that has since been removed from the website, presumably for false or misleading information. Archive is here. It's the only information I could find.
So let’s break this down...
Our “proof” is a Facebook post of some random picture of a baby with a rash, followed up by another random comment from somewhere else that allegedly is related to the first post, then a third comment in some gibberish language.
And people believe this? Then they tell you the “mom’s” name but not the kid’s, so it’s impossible to look up yourself. Who refers to their “grandnephew” instead of just calling the kid by name, if they’re related?
If the kid died there will be an obituary. THAT is proof. This shit is nothing unless it has something else to back it up.
I found an article that has since been removed from the website, presumably for false or misleading information. Archive is here. It's the only information I could find.