Ongoing mass vaccination deployments are “highly-likely to further enhance ‘adaptive’ immune escape as none of the current vaccines will prevent replication/transmission of viral variants”
So we’ll get the same coof with new surface proteins which might have a chance to evade the vaccine-derived antibodies?
As such, “The more we use these vaccines for immunizing people in the midst of a pandemic, the more infectious the virus will become”.
This conclusion is fallacious. Even if the vaccine is not 100% effective, to the degree that it is effective it will reduce viral replication, which will directly reduce random mutation and potential variance in viral surface protein. How do you figure that an even moderately effective vaccine will somehow increase viral replication opportunities?
And “With increasing infectiousness comes an increased likelihood of viral resistance to the vaccines”.
Increased infectiousness doesn’t change the coof guts of the thing. It could infect the entire human race and still be the highly survivable coof that it is.
Got a reference for that, fren?
Looked for a while to backtrack and find it.
When I come across it again I will follow-up.
So we’ll get the same coof with new surface proteins which might have a chance to evade the vaccine-derived antibodies?
This conclusion is fallacious. Even if the vaccine is not 100% effective, to the degree that it is effective it will reduce viral replication, which will directly reduce random mutation and potential variance in viral surface protein. How do you figure that an even moderately effective vaccine will somehow increase viral replication opportunities?
Increased infectiousness doesn’t change the coof guts of the thing. It could infect the entire human race and still be the highly survivable coof that it is.