40
Comments (20)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
BasedDoc 0 points ago +1 / -1

Never said she was a traitor. Disappointment, yes, but she is no traitor. Look, I didn't make the rules. She said she would sign a bill, she got a bill, by all accounts it was a good bill. Perhaps not perfect, but good. She sent it back because in her opinion she would get sued for it. She is plattempting to avoid litigation, proactively planning on losing that litigation on a law that has overwhelming support in her state and her state legislature. And then, and this is what gets to me the most, she sent the bill back to her legislature, effectively vetoing it, but not actually vetoing it. I'm seeing the same deceptive maneuvers that I have come to expect from the establishment. This isn't even about the actual issue. I don't live in her state, this bill or her executive orders have no effect on me. This is a litmus test. Is she MAGA or is she establishment. And this is an establishment move. At least have the stones to veto the bill and clearly spell out why. If it's the fault of the legislature, make them own it. That's what Trump would do. If she's unwilling or unable to fight a friendly legislature, what do you think she'll do if elected president? She is throwing cover on it with her executive orders, but I no longer trust her. And I previously held her in high regard. But I also used to hold Nikki! in high regard as well.

1
DavidGlowie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those of us that knew Haley did not so maybe once again you don't understand what it is you are watching, right? I still don't see you hold the state congress to the fire like you and other are holding norm to the fire. It was not a good bill by all accounts, evidenced by the failure to override.

It wasn't just her opinion. She conferred with many others in the bill. She isn't just hanging out alone buddy. You are clearly incapable of critical thinking. Good luck to you.

1
BasedDoc 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK, whatever you say. I'll take someone who fights and not one who rolls over. I made that pretty clear. Not interested in another establishment candidate, we have plenty of those. And she hasn't proven that she is willing to fight, much less that she isn't one of them. Take care.