Panic porn. For a million reasons were not anywhere near this. The biggest one being marxists are no where near taking over this nation.
Yes it's realistic and a good description of how the melt down happens. It's exactly why they cannot be permitted to confiscate your guns. But it describes nations and historical circumstances grotesquely unlike our own. The closest to our own was Bosnia but if you know aything about the ex soviet satellites then you know those populations were split from day 1 with no stable democratic institutions.
The animosity between the very distinct Hutu and the Tutsis goes back to French colonial days where the French essentially elevated the Tutsis to a kind of upper caste and de-elevated the Hutus. The hatred was long standing and very very distinct. Most of the killing was actually done with machetes on an individual to individual basis. Rape was a big incentive for the Hutus actually. There were othert immediate antecedents invovled which you can read about online. The point is, the tribal and colonial politics of Africa bear little semblence ot modern day America.
I have to wonder about the motives of people posting this shit. IF I say IF iI was a foreign government and I wanted to spread create and amplify dissention between Americans especially looking to trigger emotionally reactive low-IQ types into spreading this shit around to others , then this is what I would create, a website like this.
Conservatives haven't fired a shot. the McClouskies didn't fire a shot. This is the heart of stout and reserved conservatism. We see what's going on but we're not losing our shit. We're rolling up our sleeves and we're going to fix things. We're not the tribalists of Africa or the neo-Marxists of an ex-Soviet Union satellite nation or the , sorry uneducated peasants of a very very corrupt Cambodia.
We could be taking revenge for wrongs, but were not. We're slow to anger and when we're angry we're slow to react. It's our way. It's not passivity and no one should mistake it for such. We fix things. We make things right. We do things the right way and just because we insist on doing things the right way, coloring within the lines, we never find ourselves in a situtation in which it doesn't matter if we color within the lines or not, a s in the case each nation melting down reviewed at that site.
This is us:
THE WRATH OF THE AWAKENED SAXON
by Rudyard Kipling
It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the Saxon began to hate.
They were not easily moved,
They were icy — willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Saxon began to hate.
Their voices were even and low.
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show
When the Saxon began to hate.
It was not preached to the crowd.
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud
When the Saxon began to hate.
It was not suddently bred.
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.
A Kipling poem? Really? Saxon, eh? The premise there is that we are of some cohesive and unified ethnicity or even ethos... we (the USA in 2021) are distinctly not. If you think we are, you are beyond deluded. It would be nice, and we wouldn't be in this tenuous position if we all shared a commonality, but that ain't reality, bub.
The US is/was fractured long before the steal of 2020. The steal just galvanized that fact for millions. Some might call it "red pilling"
To suggest that we are going to essentially pull ourselves up from the proverbial bootstraps out of this mess by way of virtue and work is a farce. All that presupposes an in-tact Social Contract I'd strongly suggest reading that.
Those sites you've blithely dismissed are informative - they describe socialist/communist takeovers throughout history (20th Century, mostly, some 21st). Your underlying [hope-porn] premise of "American Exceptionalism" flew the coop on November 4, etc. don't you think? A blatantly stolen election, complicit media (propaganda), systemic corruption, etc. Not to mention a plandemic and subsequent "lockdown" control experiment... guess what? The control experiment worked.
Venezuela didn't become Venezuela overnight. Most of those other places didn't either. You can cherry pick the HuTus and other situations farther removed from the current state of the union here, but that's intellectually dishonest. We are under siege.
We're frogs in the pot. Some realize it, some whistle in the dark about it.
Re: social contact- thanks I am familiar with Mill.
This is dooming. Doomers, whatever else their motivations are, always ruin cohesive action and moral. I presume they are also aware of this. Why they continue doing it is anyone's guess.
Doesn't matter; anyone who follows them weeping and gnashing their teeth into Doom is automatically going to lose everything.
Everyone here is fighting to not become Venezuela so if you're conclusion is we're not aware of things but you have the big picture and informing, then you're reasoning poorly and from the wrong premises. No crime, it's a hazard for anyone who thinks about anything really.
Kennedy stole the elction from Nixon in 1960. The press covered for him. It happens. Nov 4 did not mark the end of the world.
We see the same problems and the same threats and the same possible terrible ending place but I see a war I intend to win and you see something else.
Some people see history and they pattern match it to us grossly, based on poor evidence and low IQ things like raw analogy and just so narratives. They indulge themselves in confirmation bia, reading things to confirm and amplify what they already know and seeing in all preivous events a roadmap to an inevitable future.
I know history broadly, some of it deeply and dig down into details when I encounter history new to me. I am not looking to confirm what I already believe, but to test it by looking hard and creatively for proof my theories are all wrong.
In that way I shed crude ideas and the ones I retain are solid. In that way I see learn to see through the errors other people are making because they allowed themselves to indulge in confirmation bias.
At best. that site is an execise in confirmation bias.
At worst, it's put out and maintained by our geopolitical enemies who always have the goal of dividing America and causing chaos here.
I don't fall vicitim to gross ideas and analogies like sites like that are offering up because once upon a time, I was just like everyone when they're starting off and I did. I checked myself by arguing with what I already thought was true as if to destroy it for some reason. I became my own worst critic. I was mercilessly skeptical of my own narratives. I still am.
Don't believe your own narratives. Be skeptical of them and suspicious of them. Doing that is no fun, so few people do it but if you want to know reality you have to do that and you have to take what you think you know and predict the outcome of current events. That will teach you how little you know.
Be ready: https://westernrifleshooters.us/2020/11/16/widest-possible-distribution/
Thanks for sharing this. I’m just starting to read it. Any more I should read?
Here's another link (some of the same materials, some not): https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/what-the-progressive-liberals-have-in-store-for-conservatives/
Panic porn. For a million reasons were not anywhere near this. The biggest one being marxists are no where near taking over this nation.
Yes it's realistic and a good description of how the melt down happens. It's exactly why they cannot be permitted to confiscate your guns. But it describes nations and historical circumstances grotesquely unlike our own. The closest to our own was Bosnia but if you know aything about the ex soviet satellites then you know those populations were split from day 1 with no stable democratic institutions.
The animosity between the very distinct Hutu and the Tutsis goes back to French colonial days where the French essentially elevated the Tutsis to a kind of upper caste and de-elevated the Hutus. The hatred was long standing and very very distinct. Most of the killing was actually done with machetes on an individual to individual basis. Rape was a big incentive for the Hutus actually. There were othert immediate antecedents invovled which you can read about online. The point is, the tribal and colonial politics of Africa bear little semblence ot modern day America.
I have to wonder about the motives of people posting this shit. IF I say IF iI was a foreign government and I wanted to spread create and amplify dissention between Americans especially looking to trigger emotionally reactive low-IQ types into spreading this shit around to others , then this is what I would create, a website like this.
Conservatives haven't fired a shot. the McClouskies didn't fire a shot. This is the heart of stout and reserved conservatism. We see what's going on but we're not losing our shit. We're rolling up our sleeves and we're going to fix things. We're not the tribalists of Africa or the neo-Marxists of an ex-Soviet Union satellite nation or the , sorry uneducated peasants of a very very corrupt Cambodia.
We could be taking revenge for wrongs, but were not. We're slow to anger and when we're angry we're slow to react. It's our way. It's not passivity and no one should mistake it for such. We fix things. We make things right. We do things the right way and just because we insist on doing things the right way, coloring within the lines, we never find ourselves in a situtation in which it doesn't matter if we color within the lines or not, a s in the case each nation melting down reviewed at that site.
This is us:
THE WRATH OF THE AWAKENED SAXON by Rudyard Kipling
It was not part of their blood, It came to them very late, With long arrears to make good, When the Saxon began to hate.
They were not easily moved, They were icy — willing to wait Till every count should be proved, Ere the Saxon began to hate.
Their voices were even and low. Their eyes were level and straight. There was neither sign nor show When the Saxon began to hate.
It was not preached to the crowd. It was not taught by the state. No man spoke it aloud When the Saxon began to hate.
It was not suddently bred. It will not swiftly abate. Through the chilled years ahead, When Time shall count from the date That the Saxon began to hate.
A Kipling poem? Really? Saxon, eh? The premise there is that we are of some cohesive and unified ethnicity or even ethos... we (the USA in 2021) are distinctly not. If you think we are, you are beyond deluded. It would be nice, and we wouldn't be in this tenuous position if we all shared a commonality, but that ain't reality, bub.
The US is/was fractured long before the steal of 2020. The steal just galvanized that fact for millions. Some might call it "red pilling"
To suggest that we are going to essentially pull ourselves up from the proverbial bootstraps out of this mess by way of virtue and work is a farce. All that presupposes an in-tact Social Contract I'd strongly suggest reading that.
Those sites you've blithely dismissed are informative - they describe socialist/communist takeovers throughout history (20th Century, mostly, some 21st). Your underlying [hope-porn] premise of "American Exceptionalism" flew the coop on November 4, etc. don't you think? A blatantly stolen election, complicit media (propaganda), systemic corruption, etc. Not to mention a plandemic and subsequent "lockdown" control experiment... guess what? The control experiment worked.
Venezuela didn't become Venezuela overnight. Most of those other places didn't either. You can cherry pick the HuTus and other situations farther removed from the current state of the union here, but that's intellectually dishonest. We are under siege.
We're frogs in the pot. Some realize it, some whistle in the dark about it.
Re: social contact- thanks I am familiar with Mill.
This is dooming. Doomers, whatever else their motivations are, always ruin cohesive action and moral. I presume they are also aware of this. Why they continue doing it is anyone's guess.
Doesn't matter; anyone who follows them weeping and gnashing their teeth into Doom is automatically going to lose everything.
Everyone here is fighting to not become Venezuela so if you're conclusion is we're not aware of things but you have the big picture and informing, then you're reasoning poorly and from the wrong premises. No crime, it's a hazard for anyone who thinks about anything really.
Kennedy stole the elction from Nixon in 1960. The press covered for him. It happens. Nov 4 did not mark the end of the world.
We see the same problems and the same threats and the same possible terrible ending place but I see a war I intend to win and you see something else.
Some people see history and they pattern match it to us grossly, based on poor evidence and low IQ things like raw analogy and just so narratives. They indulge themselves in confirmation bia, reading things to confirm and amplify what they already know and seeing in all preivous events a roadmap to an inevitable future.
I know history broadly, some of it deeply and dig down into details when I encounter history new to me. I am not looking to confirm what I already believe, but to test it by looking hard and creatively for proof my theories are all wrong.
In that way I shed crude ideas and the ones I retain are solid. In that way I see learn to see through the errors other people are making because they allowed themselves to indulge in confirmation bias.
At best. that site is an execise in confirmation bias.
At worst, it's put out and maintained by our geopolitical enemies who always have the goal of dividing America and causing chaos here.
I don't fall vicitim to gross ideas and analogies like sites like that are offering up because once upon a time, I was just like everyone when they're starting off and I did. I checked myself by arguing with what I already thought was true as if to destroy it for some reason. I became my own worst critic. I was mercilessly skeptical of my own narratives. I still am.
Don't believe your own narratives. Be skeptical of them and suspicious of them. Doing that is no fun, so few people do it but if you want to know reality you have to do that and you have to take what you think you know and predict the outcome of current events. That will teach you how little you know.
Social Contract was Jean Jacques Rousseau. Not Mill.
[John Stuart] Mill wrote, perhaps most widely anthologized, Utilitarianism - more of a text on moral and ethical practice.
Rousseau's text is an early modern political work discussing the tacit agreement the freeman has with a body politic (state). I'd suggest reading it.
Cheers.