We're close to having those numbers, but need a major Constitutional Crisis to force the issue. Thankfully, the Dems trying to eradicate the 1A and 2A might provide us with that opportunity. State Nullification is the key.
Actually, I lied. My preferred solution is a Hail Mary electoral reversal, but since we can't count on that, it's back to grass roots.
Let me let you in on a little secret: Most people actually want authoritarians. You might not, but the vast majority are just mindless sheep waiting to be led.
The left are fascists and it's mutually exclusive with everything else. So either you destroy them or they destroy you. There in lies the problem as at that point it's not clear which is which to someone stepping into the middle of it.
It is an interesting and complicated topic. I’m not necessarily in favor of 1930s fascism but I do think the world has changed in ways that make even a constitutional republic (not that we really even have one anymore) unworkable.
In many ways China appears more fascist now than communist. The Chinese people are largely proud ethno-nationalists and poised to take over the world in the real relatively near future.
How will the US resist this rising power when we’re busy babysitting and appeasing our population of retarded entitled minorities ?
I think the easiest way I could put it is I want something akin to the Meritocracy that is displayed in Starship Troopers.
Whether someone was correct or not in a debate was irrelevant, it was all about who was in charge. That’s who was always right.
It looks to me that you could agree with a strict Meritocracy. I will say that it is something that a society has to be careful with.
The defining quality is the heavy and often total elimination of all opposition.
You can put the wrong person in charge, but if we wanna go the route of might is right then it seems likely the wrong person in charge would not be for long. They would be destroyed.
We have been trained, well, I’ll rephrase, I have been trained my entire life to reject fascism, because I have always been told it’s evil. Over the past couple years, and especially this past year, I have warmed up to the idea. The only way we are going to win this is to destroy the Marxism that has a grip on our country, and if we wanna be honest, the entire planet.
It would probably be a better idea to not call it that, because most people instantly recoil at the idea, but I am at a loss. Since Meritocracy has also become a dirty word.
I think we need to re-think what fascism means for a global economy.
It does not matter who is really the driving force between the government-corporate marriage that is fascism...the end fascist result is what you're looking at.
Today, fascism can have a globalist ideology without going the communist route. In fact, a nationalist emphasis can put a severe wrench into a globalist fascist drive.
Yet, what label will be applied to the nationalist movement trying to oppose a globalist fascism drive?
I believe it was Churchill who said adroitly that the future Fascist uprising would disguise itself as being anti-fascist.
He did not say IF it would arise; he knew that with Germany's defeat, it only went underground, and would re-surface again sometime in the future.
Fascism is looking pretttttty good lately.
Nah, I'm not giving up my Individual Liberty for any "ism". We're Americans and we'll not be ruled.
But we are being ruled. We’ve allowed our country to be infested and the rot runs so deep it cannot be voted out. Where does that leave us?
My preferred solution is a Convention of States.
We're close to having those numbers, but need a major Constitutional Crisis to force the issue. Thankfully, the Dems trying to eradicate the 1A and 2A might provide us with that opportunity. State Nullification is the key.
Actually, I lied. My preferred solution is a Hail Mary electoral reversal, but since we can't count on that, it's back to grass roots.
I suspect that a convention of states would just kick the can down the road for a few years. Not to mention it’s insanely unlikely.
On patriots.win lmao
So a stolen presidency does not mean that you are being ruled?
It means they're trying to rule us. I'm withdrawing consent.
I'm afraid withdrawing consent and saying Americans will not be ruled is not enough.
And as much as I love individual liberty, you will not be able to fix the country by respecting everyones freedom.
Monarchy isnt an -ism.
It's still authoritarian.
Let me let you in on a little secret: Most people actually want authoritarians. You might not, but the vast majority are just mindless sheep waiting to be led.
The left are fascists and it's mutually exclusive with everything else. So either you destroy them or they destroy you. There in lies the problem as at that point it's not clear which is which to someone stepping into the middle of it.
They’re Stalinists. Fascism is a nationalist ideology. You think Antifa have pride in their nation or people ?
There's a lot of debate about what fascism was and wasn't politically but honestly a lot of it is just random stuff that's not at all relevant.
The real question you have to ask is what was bad about fascism?
The defining quality is the heavy and often total elimination of all opposition.
Whether someone was correct or not in a debate was irrelevant, it was all about who was in charge. That's who was always right.
It is an interesting and complicated topic. I’m not necessarily in favor of 1930s fascism but I do think the world has changed in ways that make even a constitutional republic (not that we really even have one anymore) unworkable.
In many ways China appears more fascist now than communist. The Chinese people are largely proud ethno-nationalists and poised to take over the world in the real relatively near future.
How will the US resist this rising power when we’re busy babysitting and appeasing our population of retarded entitled minorities ?
I think the easiest way I could put it is I want something akin to the Meritocracy that is displayed in Starship Troopers.
It looks to me that you could agree with a strict Meritocracy. I will say that it is something that a society has to be careful with.
You can put the wrong person in charge, but if we wanna go the route of might is right then it seems likely the wrong person in charge would not be for long. They would be destroyed.
We have been trained, well, I’ll rephrase, I have been trained my entire life to reject fascism, because I have always been told it’s evil. Over the past couple years, and especially this past year, I have warmed up to the idea. The only way we are going to win this is to destroy the Marxism that has a grip on our country, and if we wanna be honest, the entire planet.
It would probably be a better idea to not call it that, because most people instantly recoil at the idea, but I am at a loss. Since Meritocracy has also become a dirty word.
What are your thoughts?
I think they are genuinely nationalist, just for a nation other than this one.
I think we need to re-think what fascism means for a global economy.
It does not matter who is really the driving force between the government-corporate marriage that is fascism...the end fascist result is what you're looking at.
Today, fascism can have a globalist ideology without going the communist route. In fact, a nationalist emphasis can put a severe wrench into a globalist fascist drive.
Yet, what label will be applied to the nationalist movement trying to oppose a globalist fascism drive?
I believe it was Churchill who said adroitly that the future Fascist uprising would disguise itself as being anti-fascist.
He did not say IF it would arise; he knew that with Germany's defeat, it only went underground, and would re-surface again sometime in the future.
Fascists are collectivists.
I am not a collectivist. They are. They have a huge national identity, wokistan, which they want to destroy the U.S. to replace it with.