yep. i think they (nyt) "broke" it first. an open secret r/t'ed on twatter, and they tend to like to fact check stuff before they post...and it's usually either the person's actual words or the receipts from legal proceedings. was surprised to see them r/t this. we know the nyt will make shit up out of thin air, so....to me, this article was more about leftist predictability when a strong conservative starts rising, than what they're "hinting" matty g. has done.
They sourced from the NYT which provided their usual non-sources:
"...according to three people briefed on the matter."
yep. i think they (nyt) "broke" it first. an open secret r/t'ed on twatter, and they tend to like to fact check stuff before they post...and it's usually either the person's actual words or the receipts from legal proceedings. was surprised to see them r/t this. we know the nyt will make shit up out of thin air, so....to me, this article was more about leftist predictability when a strong conservative starts rising, than what they're "hinting" matty g. has done.