3553
Is this science? (media.patriots.win) 😷 LOCKDOWN BS 😷
posted ago by dirtysanchez69 ago by dirtysanchez69 +3553 / -0
Comments (239)
sorted by:
151
remindmelater 151 points ago +153 / -2

It's not a vaccine...that's one big lie...so they're have no trouble lying again and they will think nothing of it and everyone will just forget about the lies because they look so darned sincere on the evening news pushing this lie every two minutes...

88
deleted 88 points ago +89 / -1
84
Ocineaa 84 points ago +85 / -1

Yeah they did. Same with herd immunity (says vaccines are required for it now.)

77
Im_too_BASED 77 points ago +78 / -1

We are living in 1984, and everyone is allowing it to continue.

22
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 22 points ago +24 / -2

Buy moar ammo.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
27
Bigger_igloo 27 points ago +27 / -0

I love when people think I'm full of it when I tell them pharma is the ones paying for med school textbooks. People still have a hard time believing they change definitions and learning material constantly.

Ex: cure is no longer taught among the medical lexicon. It's almost like they want the entire concept to dissapear.... wonder why...?

12
Gonzotron5000 12 points ago +12 / -0

Well textbooks should constantly change. What science proves to be true is not always absolute. Science is just the pursuit of understanding not a set of facts. Who owns the textbooks is the big problem.

4
Barbs 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dictionaries are a reference to look up how words are being used, it’s not the authority on how they have to be used. Lots of people seem to get mixed up on that, like the dictionary defines words, instead of it being the other way around.

Sure, we can still complain that they’re adding in definitions based on pure nonsense, but it also helps contextualize what’s being said to you when if you used “normal” definitions (not the left’s) you’d be hella fucking confused.

2
zooty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, but there's language drift and then there's "Biden said it on TV last night".

4
kodama 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup! WHO changed the definition of pandemic too cuz things weren't going their way. Also reminds me of how the rockefellers funded early med schools and pharmaceuticals, found out they were causing cancer, so they founded the American cancer society. Somethin bout "play both sides"..

2
Bigger_igloo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude, I wish more people knew about that stuff. Was just telling someone at work yesterday about how Rockefeller and Ford basically created the medical system here. Founded the AMA and FDA and paid for med schools and texts.

5
FiresideRant 5 points ago +5 / -0

Are there archived documents or other comparisons made that show these changes along with the dates of the changes? this would be good info to share with family that could use some red pills.

4
Ocineaa 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have archived screenshots of the official CDC website but I'm out of town right now. It was last July roughly when they changed it.

12
NowThatsChippos 12 points ago +12 / -0

If they haven't, it's only a matter of time.

11
kornesque 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm old enough to remember seeing mRNA getting approved and checking all the dictionaries to confirm it's a medical device and not a vaccine.

4
gustodog 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, AstroZenica is the only vendor AFAIK that's selling an actual vaccine vs mRNA soup.

3
chinita_atx 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sinovax and Sputnik

2
gustodog 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks. VERY telling that the commie/crypto-commie (EU/Canada)/ex-commie countries are avoiding mRNA.

4
ericcart 4 points ago +4 / -0

Looked for a sauce and found this. TLDR but according to the author you are spreading "a niggling annoying bit of antivaccine disinformation that pops up hither, thither, and yon in antivaccine social media". Thats when I stopped reading...

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-latest-antivax-false-claim-mrna-vaccines-against-covid-19-are-not-vaccines-but-medical-devices-or-gene-therapy/

3
kornesque 3 points ago +3 / -0

kek, "Lemme just pull up this recently-edited definition of vaccine, aaaaand....voila, 2+2=5! You're wrong, bigot."

Communism always seeks to control the language.

4
Pumpitrealgood 4 points ago +4 / -0

that was unbelievable, but they did since we live in a post truth/fact world, and the truth is malleable and fluid.

4
remindmelater 4 points ago +5 / -1

I don't think so...I could be wrong....but I believe it's classification as a therapeutic is the reason why the military is not making the vaccine compulsory....so as of now because of it's classification nobody can be required to take it...

14
Italianshamrock 14 points ago +15 / -1

You can’t mandate a vaccine that’s not FDA approved.

22
War_Hamster 22 points ago +22 / -0

You can't mandate a vaccine that IS FDA approved.

Yeah, they keep trying to do so, but it sure shouldn't be allowed.

9
Italianshamrock 9 points ago +10 / -1

They can try once it is. They have in school systems forever.

11
worldowedexplanation 11 points ago +11 / -0

People have life threatening allergies and are being told by doctors NOT to take it. So not everyone can physically take it so they CANNOT make it mandatory, and how does a “passport” work then? Whole thing is bullshit.

7
labajada 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's really just an indoctrinating daycare system.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup, and that shouldn't be allowed either.

10
NPC11011110000 10 points ago +12 / -2

Jesus Christ, you people! Yes they can mandate it by proxy just like they suppress your 1st Amendment right via proxy by pressuring private businesses to censor you.

What prevents them from pressuring your job to fire you or your grocery store to throw you out?

5
MasklessMarvel 5 points ago +5 / -0

the TSA has entered the chat

4
ThurstonHowell3rd 4 points ago +4 / -0

...in the name of Safety!

4
ClarionCall 4 points ago +4 / -0

You are the preventative and the cure, you and everyone like you. WE are the preventative and the cure. People have to stand up together and be brave.

There will always be casualties, but there would be less casualties over time with action than without it.

8
BuyPepe 8 points ago +8 / -0

Why not? You think they give a shit about laws and rules? Laws and rules like the constitution only matter if you’re willing to kill the bad guys to uphold why is right. Since none of that is happening, they don’t give a flying fuck about laws, rules or the fucking constitution.

3
kornesque 3 points ago +3 / -0

The military can if it wants. I cannot explain why they haven't yet.

5
MasklessMarvel 5 points ago +5 / -0

maybe because soldiers don't fight as well when they have Bell's Palsy, develop blood clots, get the disease from the vaccination or die

Note: I am not a military expert

2
kornesque 2 points ago +2 / -0

You misunderstand my statement. They're pushing hard for everyone to get it, they just can't mandate it without a waiver from PEDOTAS.

8
mateus 8 points ago +8 / -0

👆👆👆👆👆 THIS!

... which is why, you'll notice, they've rushed to change the definition of "vaccine." Don't throw out your old dictionaries, people.

3
R-A-T-S- 3 points ago +3 / -0

This. Its like calling a noose, a safety device

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Tallsie 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s a therapy, and will have to be sued to fix the designation.

98
TickleTh1sElmo 98 points ago +98 / -0

Not a single forced decision that's been implemented by the government is about making sense. It's all about taking control.

45
thisguy883 45 points ago +46 / -1

Came here to say this.

I still have friends and family who would be willing to get the passport though, no matter how many times you explain it to them.

Some people just want to stay plugged into the Matrix.

32
StarsStripesandGrit 32 points ago +32 / -0

Most people. Which is why we are fucked.

8
War_Hamster 8 points ago +9 / -1

Most people fear losing what they have and won't act until it directly affects them. Then they'll wake up en masse, but will it be in time?

9
DairyBoy 9 points ago +9 / -0

That’s the million dollar question isn’t it?

12
War_Hamster 12 points ago +12 / -0

It is. This has been an information war, and although we are making gains as they continue to expose themselves, our consumerist culture and the pressure from a job, family, mortgage is enough to keep good men silent. Throw cancel culture on top of that, and it's understandable.

Not everyone can be Thomas Paine, but we need more of those sleepers to join us. The one thing that has me optimistic is that once a few people stand up, it becomes easier for the rest of them to do so, and plenty of us are standing up.

3
KeeptheChief 3 points ago +3 / -0

We just have to be the "few people" that stand up. It's like that illustration of the guy with the whip and the crowd where one stands up. Then a few stand up. Then all stand up and the guy with the whip is fallen.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup. Dan Bongino did a piece about how one guy started dancing and looked foolish. Then a 2nd guy got up dancing and they didn't look as stupid. Once the two of them had broken the ice, soon dozens were dancing.

It's not quite time to dance yet, but doesn't mean we don't have our dancing shoes on.

6
StarsStripesandGrit 6 points ago +7 / -1

No. It will not be. They have used social media to create avatars of everyone and then input that into simulations to figure probability of outcomes and are playing it safe all the way to total enslavement. Vaccine passports what the mother fuck

7
War_Hamster 7 points ago +7 / -0

Aside from you stating your opinion as fact, I think you're correct about this being part of their plans.

I'm not convinced they have useful data on everyone, though. I know many, like myself, who don't use social media, and if we do it's as anonymously as possible. They have incomplete data sets, and therefore wider error margins than I think they'd like.

4
Barbs 4 points ago +4 / -0

You’d still be surprised how much they know about us from our shadow profiles, especially if others close to us are using social media. It’s pretty scary how much we’re tracked via those around us.

The only place I visit regularly these days is this community. I used to split my time between here and Twitter but I bailed on the twatter the moment they banned GEOTUS. I signed up because of him, so it seemed fitting to leave when he was no longer there.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have a former client who is a Google engineer. He taught me a bunch of tricks to avoid being tracked and also let me in on just how pervasive it is.

Of course, just keeping their apps off your devices is the best start, but I'm just about ready to switch to a sat phone and hide behind my VPN for all things smart phones are used for.

But there's no way we can escape surveillance altogether if we're plugged in.

Your Twatter logic seems sound to me. I've never had an account, but did lurk a bunch in the year leading up to 11/3. Haven't been back more than a few times since and deleted Facebook when they made their WhatsApp announcement.

2
GeneralSARSChicken 2 points ago +2 / -0

Take a look down this rabbit hole. It's not just social media data that's being exploited. This article links to the Purdue white paper explaining the "Sentient World Simulation" that has been rebranded the "Digital Twin Earth"

https://emerj.com/ai-future-outlook/nsa-surveillance-and-sentient-world-simulation-exploiting-privacy-to-predict-the-future/

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm familiar, but that was a good read.

I've seen what AI can do with stock market predictions, and think it's pretty good at predicting group, but not individual behavior. This seems to suggest it's already a bit more advanced then we had feared.

Of course, this surveillance without a warrant ought to have been addressed years ago, but that would require elected officials who weren't on the payroll.

Asimov predicted this stuff, but also understood that there will always be outliers beyond a computer's ability to predict.

4
Skogin 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s a big game of musical chairs, and most people are fighting to keep their spot rather than recognizing that very soon there won’t be any chairs left.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's a good analogy.

Don't underestimate how potent the threat of being Cancelled is on some people. If you've got a mortgage and kids, social status, or whatever can be cancelled, it changes the calculation.

I keep reminding people that John Hancock was a British sympathizer until they took his home. That's why they boil the frog slowly, but the line in the sand always gets crossed eventually.

3
Skogin 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’ve seen this as a dominant explanation for how the universities were destroyed. Most professors and leaders of any legitimacy that spoke up were canceled, so the rest stayed quiet to keep their place. But their place is now a terrible joke.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's some of that in all of the lost institutions, but the Universities were specifically targeted by the Marxists who came to Colombia University from the Frankfurt School in 1949.

You also have to look at how dependent they are on elite and gov't funding.

But yes, even with tenure, many professors failed to speak out.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

It just occurred to me that scrambling for lifeboats on the sinking Titanic might be a good analogy as well. Thoughts?

2
Skogin 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was music playing until the ship went down in that case too.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

And the bankers were behind both disasters. Coincidence?

11
grndmrshlgando 11 points ago +12 / -1

They would have followed the nazi party. I’ve had many friends going along with this shit and cannot see they’re no different from what the nazis were. Worse actually since this is way bigger than what they did

15
Klown_Schwab 15 points ago +16 / -1

I saw a clip on infowars of a holocaust survivor speaking at an anti lockdown rally.

She said she's seeing disturbing parallels between 1930's Germany and now. They didnt open concentration camps right away there were several years of incremental escalation. How they're ratcheting up the propaganda, normalizing discrimination and sometimes violence against covid skeptics... is eerily similar to how it went back then.

And today's propaganda is even more insidious. Back then plenty of people knew the Nazis were oppressing them. Today too many people are convinced "the government cares about you.. this is for your own safety.."

4
grndmrshlgando 4 points ago +4 / -0

Saw the same video. Invasion force is here, time to prepare for the worst, hope for the best

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

we should call those people "blue pilled"

wait, we do?

44
remindmelater 44 points ago +44 / -0

Nothing the devil comes up with makes sense...it's the ideology of desolation....

23
Prolifemom 23 points ago +23 / -0

He is the Father of lies.

8
MasklessMarvel 8 points ago +8 / -0

Old Joe must be the Grandpa of Lies

6
MaoHadOnly1Testicle 6 points ago +6 / -0

That would make satan his son.

Therefore

Hunter = satan

HOLY SHIT

35
Coprolite 35 points ago +35 / -0

We are in clown world. Nothing makes sense.

7
Skogin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Clown World War I

This is modern warfare.

6
ericcart 6 points ago +6 / -0

Moderna warfare.

34
ZhaoBaiDeng 34 points ago +34 / -0

Transmit the virus like asymptomatic people which it turned out is not a thing 99% of the time.

But whatever keeps us from vaccine passports is ok in my book.

17
honk_honk_honk 17 points ago +17 / -0

Sometimes you have to fight stupid with more stupid.

11
Whoopies_tds 11 points ago +11 / -0

I've been told having an ID is racist

5
ZhaoBaiDeng 5 points ago +5 / -0

Requiring a phone is not though...

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

not if you are a criminal alien using a fake one to vote

32
Mother_of_gains 32 points ago +32 / -0

They'll argue that vaccinated people will have less chance of transmitting because they don't get symptoms that lend themselves to spread (coughing, sneezing etc).

Watch them self implode when you ask them why the same logic doesn't apply to asymptomatic carriers of covid who also aren't coughing or sneezing.

23
thisguy883 23 points ago +23 / -0

They can literally have the virus in their body, which defeats the whole purpose of this whole thing.

You're gonna get it. No matter how much you try to avoid it, you're gonna get it.

And after you recover 2 days later, you're gonna say to yourself, "That's it?", like I did.

4
wintermoot 4 points ago +4 / -0

You need to have a LOT of virus in your system to be able to infect people. If you yourself can't get infected there's no way that you're carrying a relevant amount of it.

2
le_destroy 2 points ago +3 / -1

Had it once myself, would take again, gimme dem two weeks off

2
ATK69 2 points ago +2 / -0

And people are stilllll going to get stabbed after the fact. Unbelievable.

1
IthoughtIwalked 1 point ago +1 / -0

Getting stabbed after having COVID is one of the risks of living in Baltimore lol

6
Littleirishmaid 6 points ago +6 / -0

Stop thinking logically.

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Faucist: "You can spread COVID even if you don't have COVID"

4
dukeofdoorcounty 4 points ago +5 / -1

If you get sick you would stay home. With the vaccine you'll feel great and go out and spread to others. So you still need to wear a mask. Forever

2
KeeptheChief 2 points ago +2 / -0

By that logic, doesn't the vaccine actually help spread the virus?

1
chinita_atx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, this vaccine does. That's why van den bossche says it's a myopic and suboptimal solution. It lets the virus to escape and as it escapes, it can mutate. mRNA only helps reduce hospitalizations because your symptoms are lessened. But you are still shedding the virus if you get it. So you can still spread it that's why they are asking you to mask.

1
spezisapedo2 1 point ago +1 / -0

if you have symptoms you can know to stay at home... If you dont have symptoms you will keep going out and spreading it... well you would, except for new CDC TRIPLE MASK guidelines to keep us all safe.

25
blubberdong 25 points ago +25 / -0

They'll probably have an update reversing these issues to pacify the idiots.

41
Butt_expert 41 points ago +41 / -0

They literally did. Yesterday the CDC announced that they did a study, and the vaccine does, in fact, prevent infection.

They also released a second one saying the vaccine does, in fact, protect against variants, including the south african one.

They seriously found their narrative falling apart, so abandoned the "must stay locked down forever" narrative by updating their made-up catalog of fake studies to support the "must get vaccine and live under vaccine rules" narrative.

30
thisguy883 30 points ago +30 / -0

Soon it will be, "It will protect you, but for this year only. You will need a booster shot every year because (some made up science jargon)"

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
17
Trump2024 17 points ago +17 / -0

I won't need a "booster" if I don't get the initial shot.

blackguytappingtemple.gif

6
Skogin 6 points ago +6 / -0

⚠️ Digital Blackface ⚠️

7
JudicialDredd 7 points ago +7 / -0

Vaccine fast pass 2021. Get yours now!

*Rules and limitations apply. Fast pass only good for 1 calender year. Re-application dependant on social credit score. Offer not available in florida or texas.

3
BadManOrange 3 points ago +3 / -0

Weren't they saying at the beginning that the vaccine would only work for a few months?

2
Skogin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe they meant the vaccine hoax would only work for a few months.

13
TheBigT03 13 points ago +14 / -1

Was talking to a doctor about this. Said literally no one he knows believes what the cdc is saying. They literally flip flop on everything.

10
worldowedexplanation 10 points ago +10 / -0

The CDC has covered up and lied about the Lyme disease epidemic for DECADES. They are corrupt.

2
ThurstonHowell3rd 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's because Big Pharma hasn't developed a vaccine for Lyme Disease yet (it's coming though). Once that happens the CDC will claim to know everything about the disease.

1
IthoughtIwalked 1 point ago +1 / -0

Source on this? What is being covered up and lied about?

People in Lyme-ridden areas with even the simplest of symptoms like headaches get Lyme studies and antibiotics.

4
UpTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

My doctor is a cuck and believes everything cdc says 100%

4
TheBigT03 4 points ago +4 / -0

Get a new md cause urs is clearly retarded.

4
theblackprince 4 points ago +4 / -0

Unfortunately that's not the easiest thing to do. The rot we've seen over the last half century of a complacent/decadent society extends to all realms. The new generation of doctors is lesser than the one that came before, generally speaking. If you are unsure of yours, a good test is to go in and watch how they examine you. If they're looking into your eyes and face and talking to you as the person they loosely know, listening to what ails you, examining the parts you're having problems with, that's an old school well-trained doc. If, however, they're sitting at a computer and staring at a screen punching in your answers to questions hardly looking at you, then they're the new breed.

3
Butt_expert 3 points ago +4 / -1

Then they will complain about lack of confidence in our public health institutions. GEE I WONDER WHY??

6
TheBigT03 6 points ago +6 / -0

Maybe they should actually do some fucking scientific research instead of saying what’s politically convenient. Cdc is a joke

8
MasklessMarvel 8 points ago +8 / -0

masks don't work so you must get the vaccination but the vaccination doesn't work so you must keep wearing a mask

it's that simple

1
wintermoot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well they kinda had to. You need to be infected to spread the virus, and the protein that the vaccines target is highly conserved. Their initial positions were anti-science .

10
farstriderr 10 points ago +10 / -0

Science is settled when it suits them, like global warming. Also when it suits them, science is "constantly changing" because we learn new info.

7
rsme3 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yep. Yesterday they said people that have the vax can’t carry the virus. The cdc crying chick.

24
South_Florida_Guy 24 points ago +24 / -0

It's 100% about control, submission and humiliation and ZERO to do with health, safety or science.

11
Genericwhitemale 11 points ago +11 / -0

shutup and take this anal swab, bigot!

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

that's what Big Mike said to Obongo

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

global warming- science says it's true

vaccinations- fuck science

4
South_Florida_Guy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, actual real observable science (and not just erroneously programmed computer models) says otherwise about that whole global warming thing but those are just my racist hate facts.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

there is global warming

there is no human caused global warming and we can do fuck all about it

17
JuicyfearsMAGA 17 points ago +18 / -1

Can't have a vaccine for a non existent disease

16
usa_foot_print 16 points ago +16 / -0

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???

COVID IS VERY REAL!!! ITS AVERAGE AGE OF KILLING IS 82!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

12
runeu 12 points ago +12 / -0

Didn't you see that people died? Hundreds of thousands of Americans died in 2020!

Like the one who had a bad ticker for decades finally had a heart attack... because of covid!

Or the woman who is 90 years old... got sick and died. Would not have happened without covid! Says so right here on the death certificate.

Or how about the 459 lbs diabetic who succumbed to covid? He was perfectly fine before tRump allowed this virus to take over.

Now wear your mask, get your shot, and show your papers please.

6
3
Truthdose 3 points ago +3 / -0

really...................

5
MasklessMarvel 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Someone heard this guy sneeze a few days before he fell into a wood chipper"

"Another tragic COVID death"

7
Ophelia 7 points ago +7 / -0

New study came out.

8O% of covid hospitalizations in the US were obese or overweight people.

Duh. 🤡🌎

5
Genericwhitemale 5 points ago +5 / -0

Covid killed my 450 lb uncle. It’s real, believe me!

4
thisguy883 4 points ago +5 / -1

Well you're right that it's not a disease.

It's a real virus though, albeit not a very dangerous one.

2
JuicyfearsMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

.002 overall same death rate as the flu, but ask a liberal it scientist or doctor to show you covid on a molecular level. Challenge them because they can't. They'll just make shit up about losing your taste or smell or testosterone and reeeee at you.

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

actually Kung Flu is a good disease

because of it, cases of seasonal flu dropped 98%

2
JuicyfearsMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess we can credit to the all time low in heart disease and cancer deaths as well. I'd rather credit president Trump though for those things

2
operatorstorm712 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, the disease is there; coronavirus is real. But, pretty damn hard to create a vaccine for a virus that has incredible ability to mutate (coronavirus family)...and an endemic virus tends to mutate towards less lethal variants.

Oddly enough, there's been a canine coronavirus vaccine on the market for years...and it's in the "not recommended" category because the majority of the time infection only causes mild, self-limiting symptoms that run their course, so the vaccine isn't that necessary. Coronavirus is also fairly easily killed by common household disinfectants.

2
AtTheInauguration 2 points ago +2 / -0

They think we're crazy anyways so fuck it, I'd rather go with the virus being the a hoax. Become what they call you.

17
Binski 17 points ago +17 / -0

Some of the Fox news anchors are happy about the passport. I hope none of you still watch that shit.

9
GreatHumungous 9 points ago +9 / -0

Haven’t watched Faux News for a long time.

15
10gauge 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is the science of propaganda. We are the test group/victims.

14
sustainable_saltmine 14 points ago +14 / -0

If a vaccine does not give you a high percentage of being immune, fully immune, it is not a vaccine.

2
DrinkLikeAGilmore 2 points ago +3 / -1

Man made vaccines have never and will never create authentic immunity, even to their own lab made viruses, as most viruses and diseases ARE lab made. They create the problem then sell us on needing their "cures".

13
MrMerlin 13 points ago +13 / -0

If you can still get the disease and transmit it, then getting the “vaccine” also makes no sense.

3
WakeUpAmerica 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hey now, you are not supposed to do such a radical thing as...THINKING! ;-)

1
chinita_atx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reducing hospitalizations is the (myopic) goal.

12
CHEVLEON 12 points ago +12 / -0

My boss and Co-worker both got the vaccine. I told them I'm not getting it, and will just get it by proxy because of them. They respect my decision.

10
MakeWorldGreatAgain 10 points ago +10 / -0

If this is true then wtf is the point of me getting the vaccine? I had very minor symptoms cause good health and strong immune system.

4
Italianshamrock 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you still have antibodies you don’t need it.

3
WakeUpAmerica 3 points ago +3 / -0

But you need the vaccine to get the passport.

1
Bucktooth34 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I'm a POC and ID is racist.

3
Genericwhitemale 3 points ago +3 / -0

the point is, Billy G. and his gang make more money the more people take the vaccine. So, go schedule an appointment NOW!!

1
chinita_atx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reduce hospitalizations

10
Scumbag-reddit 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is the definition of a leaky vaccine; give people false premise that they're not able to get or spread, leads to quick mutation of the virus to make it more resilient, easier to spread, and deadlier.

1
chinita_atx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. mRNA allows the virus to escape which will allow it to mutate.

9
Meddlesom 9 points ago +9 / -0

So it's not a vaccine. Understood. I'll take my chances with my immune system that has only allowed me to catch a cold or flu once in the past twenty years.

8
honk_honk_honk 8 points ago +8 / -0

Schrodinger's vaccine, to go with Schrodinger's virus (covid) and Schrodinger's minority (Kamala).

6
CynicalTwit22 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's an IQ test. Kill off the stupid.

5
Ssue1216 5 points ago +5 / -0

Then wtf would anyone get the damn thing

5
MAGA_MEME 5 points ago +5 / -0

THIS IS TRUE FOR ALL VACCINES BY THE WAY

5
Trump2024 5 points ago +5 / -0

The CNC said that vaccinated people can't be asymptomatic carriers now. But they can get the virus again with reduced symptoms. Isn't that being a carrier? If you caught the virus again but it was so mild you barely or didn't notice it sounds like a carrier to me.

5
TheNorthRembers42 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’ll play their game for a min. 78% of white women and 70% of white men are getting vaccinated versus 10% of black women and 9% of black men. The passport will be tied to financial gains/freedoms. Just another bullshit Democrat idea that further disenfranchises the black community. Nothing they do holds up to any logical scrutiny. Fucking retards.

2
KeeptheChief 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those statistics need to be put on a freaking billboard.

5
HKFan 5 points ago +5 / -0

It makes sense if you're trying to gain totalitarian control over your subjects

4
GreatHumungous 4 points ago +4 / -0

So a vaccine now just ‘reduces the symptoms’? So like for polio, if you get a vaccine you’ll only get half polio and still suffer and die it will just take a few more years? I’d rather just not get a vaccine then!

2
R-A-T-S- 2 points ago +2 / -0

You just half die from it. Hopefully its the half you aint' using.

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wow, they did not have this trouble with polio and small pox vaccine

they almost completely eradicated those diseases

4
BananaWizard 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah it makes no sense. This is correct as far as my research shows.

2
WakeUpAmerica 2 points ago +2 / -0

What about people that actually had COVID-19 and acquired immunity naturally: will they have to take a vaccine (that they do not need) in order to get the passport?

1
Red_Turtle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes.

They can't have us testing ourselves for antibodies and let people find out they were already "sick" and didn't even realize. Then they'd realize that the lockdown didn't slow any of it and we were lied to about how bad it is.

This is why the definition of "herd immunity" on the WHO website was edited to say it only is accomplished through vaccination and not vaccination and exposed/recovered people.

2
WakeUpAmerica 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is natural immunity discrimination!

Who in their right mind would trust the WHO at this point?

4
Greenhills 4 points ago +4 / -0

It makes perfect sense when it’s a cover for a different purpose.

4
mainsoda 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fucking A, this is exactly right and there is no logic left in the world.

3
CMDRConanAAnderson 3 points ago +3 / -0

They want to tally the number of people they can control.

3
CJ52 3 points ago +3 / -0

It makes perfect sense.

It makes it much easier to identify the sheep who won't resist their Nazi Bullshit.

It's like a woman tattooing "slut" on her forehead or twerking in public, at that point...everybody knows.

The only difference, she'll probably have lube in her purse...... the government does not use lube.

3
Peter2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

Making sense is not their job tho. Their job is to destroy the sense.

3
MooseOperator 3 points ago +3 / -0

Democrat logic: Voter ID is racist and restricts peoples rights

Also Democrats:

2
SovereignSon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey bud.........come here........ you want to buy a vac card?

2
TheStupidestBitch 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is called a "leaky vaccine" and it results in enabling the viruses to mutate into hyper-deadly variants.

See Marek's disease in chickens: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marek%27s_disease#prevention

2
CarbonMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is bullshit, they are just repeating hearsay. From what I have understood, if your immune system produces antibodies from either a vaccine or having it yourself, in that case, it will not be transmitted. Of course, there are exceptions (vaccine don't always take and some people don't maintain antibodies for a long time) but that is few and far between and we have never cared about that before.

1
chinita_atx 1 point ago +1 / -0

1:20 Fauci admits mRNA vaccine does not make you immune from getting covid-19 (after initially saying it does)

Because mRNA is actually a therapy and does not fall under the traditional definition of a vaccine. You can still get the virus, and because of this vaccine, your body will attack the virus so you don't get full blown symptoms. The goal is to prevent hospitalizations. And as you get better, you will shed the virus and right there is where the virus can escape (transmission).

1
CarbonMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

As a source European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control says the complete opposite (from two days ago) of this tweet: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/sars-cov-2-transmission-newly-infected-individuals-previous-infection

2
EvJohn 2 points ago +2 / -0

The entire power structure of this world makes no sense. Just assume the shit that they're feeding you is a lie and act accordingly. Use your own senses and discernment.

2
LarryBugman 2 points ago +2 / -0

So they are going seemingly to any length to get this poison into everyone, even going balls-out Orwellian.

So does this mean that this is just a multi billion dollar a year grift to inject us with chemical garbage, or the preparation for getting the population of the first world to be vulnerable to the next Frankenvirus they release from the labs?

3
DrinkLikeAGilmore 3 points ago +3 / -0

They have already been poisoning our food, air, water, health & beauty products. Their tainted products we consume haven't worked fast enough so they needed this "vaccine" to speed up their agenda.

2
Pumpitrealgood 2 points ago +2 / -0

yeah, but the dullards are clueless, they think they are 100% protected, can't wait for the big awakening next fall when they start dropping like flies, and not only that, the lunatics will announce that they need booster shots for the variant lol

2
Siteless_Vagrant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wait, didn't I read something earlier this week that said the CDC claimed once you're vaxxed you can't even CARRY covid? Narrative seems to be falling apart.

2
MySidesGoUp 2 points ago +2 / -0

We must pass the Bill inject the vaccine virus to see what’s in it- right, Nancy? That decrepit fuck should be the test subject.

2
Lurker6 2 points ago +2 / -0

Until Fauci goes on CNN and says the opposite without any sort of evidence and that's the "facts" the normies will believe.

1
wintermoot 1 point ago +1 / -0

That doesn't even make sense. If you can't get infected you can't be transmitting enough virus particles to infect other people.

1
chinita_atx 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can get infected. That's why some people rightly say that this is a therapeutic rather than a vaccine.

1
CHEMST 1 point ago +1 / -0

If a person is in the quoted 95+% they will develop an immunity from the vaccine. Immune people cannot spread the virus as well as a door can as their immune system attacks and destroys the virus as soon as it appears in the body. If a person is in the <5% the vaccine does not result in immunity and they can become infected, at which time the virus multiplies rapidly in the host, and can readily infect others. Hence, he is right about the small percent and wrong about the larger segment.

1
MAGA_____bitches 1 point ago +1 / -0

I Got a little bit of Polio last summer and I think I spread it to my friends.

1
halfstep 1 point ago +1 / -0

Vaccine Compliance Card

1
Hexagon 1 point ago +1 / -0

The passport makes no sense because it is a violation of our rights and commie /Nazi drivel.

1
behemoth887 1 point ago +1 / -0

u gotta take the lib virus vaccine, but not cuz it prevents getting the virus, it's cuz wtf ur hitler stop asking questions

1
TopHat213 1 point ago +1 / -0

Vaccine? I thought the passports are used to control how we spend and where we are allowed to travel to