1556
Comments (109)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
UpTrump 3 points ago +7 / -4

Different story this time because the military has unbelievable firepower over us. The difference in weapons quality wasn't very much back then

17
SFAM1A 17 points ago +17 / -0

Laughs in Vietnamese

1
ColonelHughes 1 point ago +1 / -0

overall we slaughtered them. politicians cucked that entire engagement and we still got them to sign a treaty. then we left and didnt come back when the treaty was predictably broken

1
SFAM1A 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a case study for the US how not to fight a war, and it's also a case study on how a bunch of peasants can stand up to a much more heavily armed military.

1
ColonelHughes 1 point ago +1 / -0

gotta agree there.

if we had someone like patton at the helm of that there wouldn't be a Vietnam just another state of the US