At one point Australia had no black people. Then they colonised it.
At one point Spain had no black people. Then they colonised it. (Then they were invited to leave again).
At one point South Africa was populated by some peoples, then Shaka Zulu went on the warpath and killed them, colonising their lands.
That pattern has been repeated across Africa.
If you want to call African countries 'countries of origin' because the colonisers subsequently migrated on, then the USA is a country of origin for white people, as Americans migrate on too.
But don't ask me, I'm biased. My country of birth was invaded and colonised during my lifetime.
Aborigines are not African. 2. Spain was invaded by Moors, not blacks. South Africa had few blacks to start with except for the San (Bushmen) whose DNA relates to Chinese with yellowish skin, and slanted eyes. You can't "colonize" your own continent of origin. That's just called drifting. I have a hard time with your "The US is a country origin for whites as they migrated on too ? Your "thinking" doesn't make any sense, and you can't even get your races correct. WOW !
Australian aborigines are blacker than almost all Africans.
You can't "colonize" your own continent of origin. That's just called drifting
Oh, ok. If we're making up new rules then you can't colonise other continents because they're all just the same planet and anyway, they were all the same continent once anyway.
Well done, you're right, black people have never colonised anywhere because nobody has.
you can't even get your races correct. WOW !
Oh wait, we're talking races? Everybody I referenced is part of the human race. There are no other human races.
There absolutely is not a 'black' race - as you suggest, Moors, Zulus, Bushmen and Aborigines all have different genetic backgrounds.
You asked a stupid question and you can't deny my perfectly congruent answer without ripping apart the very premise of your own question. Well done.
No, I don't get the point ! Most of those Countries are Countries of origin. But you're saying they colonized Spain, and Australia ? Please explain.
At one point Australia had no black people. Then they colonised it.
At one point Spain had no black people. Then they colonised it. (Then they were invited to leave again).
At one point South Africa was populated by some peoples, then Shaka Zulu went on the warpath and killed them, colonising their lands.
That pattern has been repeated across Africa.
If you want to call African countries 'countries of origin' because the colonisers subsequently migrated on, then the USA is a country of origin for white people, as Americans migrate on too.
But don't ask me, I'm biased. My country of birth was invaded and colonised during my lifetime.
Australian aborigines are blacker than almost all Africans.
Oh, ok. If we're making up new rules then you can't colonise other continents because they're all just the same planet and anyway, they were all the same continent once anyway.
Well done, you're right, black people have never colonised anywhere because nobody has.
Oh wait, we're talking races? Everybody I referenced is part of the human race. There are no other human races.
There absolutely is not a 'black' race - as you suggest, Moors, Zulus, Bushmen and Aborigines all have different genetic backgrounds.
You asked a stupid question and you can't deny my perfectly congruent answer without ripping apart the very premise of your own question. Well done.