Same here. I was in college and all the blacks on campus erupted in utter joy. There could have been 4K video of OJ killing them. They did not give a shit.
Based on the other conversation in this thread, I think the difference between tribes and nations is just size, as you imply.
The point I should be making then is that tribes lead to nations. You get a nation when tribes join other tribes. You need tribalism to be successful as a tribe. If you are weak and do not have strong unity within your tribe, you will be conquered.
We're past that bullshit now though, at least we should be.
You are correct. To affiliate with any tribe is to miss the point. We are all one big tribe, one family of God's children. Some of God's children might be reliably untrustworthy, but that stereotype does not denigrate them in God's eyes. It merely acts as a barrier ready to be pierced by love and fraternization.
It was odd hearing people cheering for a morally corrupt murderer.
It was also enlightening to see how our system of justice utterly failed.
The talking heads all went on and on about who's lawyer was better and what spin they could introduce and none of them ever wondered if the Truth was going to come out.
"If the glove don't fit you must acquit!" lol what morons. See OP photo which shows the gloves are clearly on his hand.
My brother did work for a comedian who was hired to entertain the sequestered jury before the defense had even presented its case. The guy told my bro that he asked the jury foreman what she was going to do once the trial was over and she was released and she said "we are going to throw OJ the biggest party you ever saw." Seems legit!
Yup - ill never forget, i was on Queens Boulevard, blacks were high fiving each other, honking their horns, getting out their car and dancing in the middle of the street like they all just won the lottery.
100%. Feralism....it's why Africa had remained in the throes of chaos, mayhem, and disorder for eternity. No amount of world aid or intervention will ever fix the continent's inherent desire to destroy your neighbor and take their stuff.
I was going to a Dodgers game the evening he was slamming down the 5 in the white Bronco. He passed me.
Someone caught the news at the game on their radio it was OJ. My first thought is anyone running like that from the law is guilty as fuck after a double murder of their wife and boyfriend. An innocent person would be grieving their ass off.
The prosecution and LAPD did an absolutely atrocious job on this case virtually all around. He deserved the acquittal in my book as much as I think it was possible that he was at least involved or at least aware of the two murders.
The main evidence against him was the DNA. Damaging evidence for sure, but the chain of custody and how the initial cops preserved the crime scene was just so beyond a joke you couldn't put full stock in it. The cops literally covered the two bodies with bed sheets from a hamper if you can believe that.
Whoever killed Goldman should've been covered in blood. He was stabbed 30 plus times and fought his murderer to the point where he had bruising all over his knees and knuckles. He was a 6'2" 200 plus pound karate instructor in his 20's and 55 year old OJ dusts him and only ends up with a small scratch on his palm, a few droplets of blood on him and a few partial bloody footprints at the scene?
It's really only possible if there were more than one attacker working in well a coordinated manner. OJ certainly could've been one of those attackers and he certainly could've visited the crime scene at some point but it seems almost impossible given the 25 minute window of opportunity and the fact that the Nicole Brown murder seems premeditated but then OJ supposedly does the deed while waiting for his limo to come pick him up for the airport? How can it be premediated and hasty at the same time and yet there isn't a mountain of evidence against OJ if he was the perpetrator?
All this. I also remember the blood vial taken from a prior DUI was nearly empty, and the blood spatter tested on the back gate was found to contain the same preservative as the DUI test vial.
I was watching in a crowded room at work the day they announced the murders and started convicting OJ in the media with LAPD evidentiary talking points. Popular opinion had him hands down guilty right there.
I however disagreed. “Have you never seen Perry Mason?” I asked.
I won a $100 bet when he was acquitted. Clarke and Durden were inept. The evidence was mishandled, etc.
Add to all that my personal knowledge of OJ’s pad being an LAPD party house. Lots of drugs, sex, drinking were going on. Rumors swirled that Nicole was having an affair with a certain detective figuring prominently in the investigation. Nicole and Faye were dealing kilos of powder and had crossed the line with their suppliers. Goldman was allegedly involved with the dealing as well.
Nicole and Ron were killed by the cartel they owed 100’s of thousand in cocaine debt. They were amateur coke dealers to the elite in brentwood. Bad money management and she constantly wanted OJ to payoff her debts. Once he stopped paying they came and did what they do.
Whoever killed her was pretty clearly sending a message and this is basically the theory I head that had the most evidence behind it. She was a known habitual user among other drugs.
Prosecutors and cops alike have gotten extremely lazy. Rather than do their job well, they over-rely on technology, but more directly they rely on the jury selection process to be tilted in their favor and supply a compliant jury pool that's easy to manipulate.
I'm inclined to believe they tanked the case against OJ. There are plenty of credibly conspiracy theories involving drug trafficking that make exponentially more sense than "jealous celebrity goes on killing spree against ex wife."
It's also not only the sloppy case that gets my Spidey sense going, it's the totally fake "high speed" Bronco chase that was clearly orchestrated by the LAPD and mainstream media. Once you fake that and play it up anything is possible. Lots of parallels to both the Floyd case and Rodney King in that a lot of what is presented in the media is exaggerated, skewed and just plain complete bullshit.
There's a lot of circumstantial evidence tying Nicole Brown at least indirectly to organized crime and drug dealing, one of the prevalent theories that seemed credible was about the restaurant she was invested in (and Goldman worked at) dealing cocaine and/or laundering money. At the bare minimum she was involved with people through investments that were involved in organized crime. OJ was as well without question. That's enough for me to think the whole thing was likely at least partially a charade.
I read Bugliosi's book about it, and one of the funny things he points out is that Marcia Clark helped sabotage the prosecution because she was painting him as a wife beater, which was more tolerated at the time in the black community. She wouldn't listen to shit, she was going to ramrod the wife beating aspect come hell or high water.
Not to mention that Judge Ito was a shithead.
I totally agree on Clark, but Darden was no genius either. Honestly a huge mistake to put Clark out front and center to begin with on a couple different levels.
However, to be fair- wthout the wife beater angle they basically have no motive that they are presenting. The motive they went with was not very solid at all and pretty much hinged on OJ being a psycho jealous person who would kill her in a moment of passion. Which is a pretty convoluted story to be telling a jury in my opinion in the context of the actual alleged timeline of the murders.
One of the jurors is actually on record stating that the OJ verdict was revenge for the Rodney King verdict.
Every Western institution has promoted intense racial and ethnic tribalism among non-white peoples for decades. At the same time, these institutions have severely demonized any racial or ethnic tribalism among white peoples. The end result is our present situation: non-whites viciously attacking white peoples, cultures, and nations, none of which are permitted solidarity to defend themselves.
I like the Chris rock routine about that. Something about how black people all thought they won something when OJ was acquitted. His joke was something like each day I keep checking the mailbox for my OJ prize but I haven’t gotten anything yet.
I was in college at the time the verdict was announced, there must have been a few hundred of is in the student union watching. When the words "not guilty" were uttered, I shit you not, all the white people threw their arms up in disgust and all the black people started yelling, cheering, throwing high fives, dancing on tables. It was as if we had watched two different trails.
YES. I have said this for so long. The OJ case was a pivotal, generational moment in our time when half of the population deemed reason and objective reality secondary to political power, if not disposable altogether.
My school had black students celebrating in the hallways. One of my 'friends' later told me it was because they got together for weeks leading up to the verdict with other black students to watch black identity films to build up their anger.
Racism is very popular in the black community and most folks don't want to address it.
Now, I don't treat black folks any different than I do white folks. I just don't pretend to ignore their racism as a lot of folks do.
ADOS Blacks are on the verge of extinction in the US. They can thank Democrats. Not "White Supremacists"
The narrative in the common ethno centric black household is white man racist. That's the driver of every moral and judicial decision and why we saw parades for Floyed and jubilation for OJ.
But they didn't make that up themselves. That narrative was developed by white regressives to control their vote.
Yeah, for them it wasn't about actual justice. A black man killed two white people so to them OJ did nothing wrong. Their version of justice was a clearly guilty black man beating the rap. For them, knowing that a guilty black man walked free was victory.
I guess we were in very different parts of the country. I was in junior high. The mood was completely somber and / or furious. EVERYONE knew he was guilty, and was getting away with murder for political reasons.
It's always interesting to revisit events from childhood with the wisdom of adulthood. I used to think the OJ verdict was a case of a very rich man getting away with murder. Now I know it was a case of black jurors gleefully refusing to convict a black man of killing white people.
I was in middle school and I remember everyone crowded around the 1 tv on a cart. Everyone erupted in joy when it was announced while me and like one or two other kids were not.
No one ever gives a fuck when a black murders a white or even if a black murders another black, but god forbid a white kill a black. Then it's definitely muh wHiTe SuPreMaCy!!!!
I also remember the Scott Peterson charade on Nancy Grace. It was years later I learned about Peterson actively cooperating with the police and all of the counter evidence that was never mentioned on T.V.
Same story, tribal warfare, just from the opposite side.
I'll be honest, I think it 100% stems from embedded racism where the white man is always bad and thus any time something "doesn't go in favor of the White man", for lack of better phrasing, it is cause for celebration amongst those too smooth brained to see past their own self-defeating thoughts.
A lot of it stems from alternate history and education of black children both at home and in public schools.
A child wonders: why does my life suck?
Well it's not your mom's fault, even though she got knocked up at 15 and dropped out of school and doesn't work and leaves you with Grandparents while she goes out every night.
It's not your dad's fault, even though he ditched your mom, also dropped out of high school, sold drugs to make an easy buck, got pinched and served hard time, can't get a job with his record...
So who is to blame?
Whitey. Slavery. Someone, anyone else. You tell this fairytale to your kid late at night so he doesn't hate you for being a piece of shit, and he buys it because he loves you. If he knew how selfish you were, he might not. But he's not going to hear anything else at our converged schools or in our converged media.
I was in middle school at the time and my science teacher was so ANGRY he lectured the class on what an absolute travesty it was and that justice was not served. That is all I remember about that day and I didn't see anyone happy about it. The next year when we moved though... 😳
It’s amazing that people still haven’t figured out that there was a reason black people were segregated and given less rights than whites. They’re tribal, will always be tribal, will also hate you for not being black, and will act like animals because of the aforementioned fact.
Of course. The LA county prosecutor threw that case so it wouldn’t be Rodney King riots part 2. Come on. Moving it to downtown. The jury. The rookie prosecutors. The phony witnesses. This was a 2 day trial at best. Blood, shoe prints. Escape plan. The prosecution rests. Now prove he didn’t do it dream team.
The entire justice system is a sham. The idea that people can get off murder and other serious crimes on technicalities even if it's clear that the person is 100% guilty shows that actual justice is not the most important thing. The legal system cares more about its own rules than finding truth and administering justice.
Same here. I was in college and all the blacks on campus erupted in utter joy. There could have been 4K video of OJ killing them. They did not give a shit.
We should give them the war they seek.
dont ever believe the narrative.
So true. But I'm white and I felt unsafe so I headed out to burn down some buildings and loot some convenient stores to protest. Oh wait.
I remember that like it was yesterday.
This is only weird to you because you refuse to affiliate with your tribe.
Tribalism is why the Middle East and Africa are forever fucked up shitholes
Tribalism is why Europe consolidated power. Anyone who opposed the tribe was removed.
Wouldn’t that be Nationalism?
Is your oath of loyalty to the state? Or to the king and his bloodline?
Nationalism is a post imperial concept.
what's the difference between nationalism and tribalism?
Nations can contain many tribes. Can tribes contain many tribes?
interesting point
Based on the other conversation in this thread, I think the difference between tribes and nations is just size, as you imply.
The point I should be making then is that tribes lead to nations. You get a nation when tribes join other tribes. You need tribalism to be successful as a tribe. If you are weak and do not have strong unity within your tribe, you will be conquered.
We're past that bullshit now though, at least we should be.
Tribalism is division. Nationalism is unity
would tribalism not have unity within the tribe?
Nationalism is both tribalistic and a bond of unity.
No, it is because of their corruption, among other things.
You are correct. To affiliate with any tribe is to miss the point. We are all one big tribe, one family of God's children. Some of God's children might be reliably untrustworthy, but that stereotype does not denigrate them in God's eyes. It merely acts as a barrier ready to be pierced by love and fraternization.
Now I understand why the romans feed christians to lions.
They also brutally tortured and murdered their King and God! The Romans were not fans of the Christians.
Now that is funny 😁!
Fed. The Christians toppled evil Rome by turning the other cheek.
I assume they found someone less annoying to handle the interactions?
Just keep turning cheeks and you'll find one you like.
Indeed, Christianity toppled Rome. I wonder what would have happened without it.
The bondage would have carried on uninterrupted.
I remember that.
It was odd hearing people cheering for a morally corrupt murderer.
It was also enlightening to see how our system of justice utterly failed.
The talking heads all went on and on about who's lawyer was better and what spin they could introduce and none of them ever wondered if the Truth was going to come out.
The same people distanced themselves from OJ real quick when they saw the surprise elf on the shelf.
https://i.imgur.com/3bXGGAO.jpg
"If the glove don't fit you must acquit!" lol what morons. See OP photo which shows the gloves are clearly on his hand.
My brother did work for a comedian who was hired to entertain the sequestered jury before the defense had even presented its case. The guy told my bro that he asked the jury foreman what she was going to do once the trial was over and she was released and she said "we are going to throw OJ the biggest party you ever saw." Seems legit!
They want public court of opinion and mob rule to be the law of the land
Is it not?
Yup - ill never forget, i was on Queens Boulevard, blacks were high fiving each other, honking their horns, getting out their car and dancing in the middle of the street like they all just won the lottery.
100%. Feralism....it's why Africa had remained in the throes of chaos, mayhem, and disorder for eternity. No amount of world aid or intervention will ever fix the continent's inherent desire to destroy your neighbor and take their stuff.
We all went through it in our cultures histories
Africa hadn't gotten out of it, for a variety of reasons, and trying to bring civilization to them isn't working out so well either
They have to fix themselves from within. Pretty hard to do now, since they've already been tampered with.
I was going to a Dodgers game the evening he was slamming down the 5 in the white Bronco. He passed me.
Someone caught the news at the game on their radio it was OJ. My first thought is anyone running like that from the law is guilty as fuck after a double murder of their wife and boyfriend. An innocent person would be grieving their ass off.
No one give a shit about that at my school, but it was 98.6% white.
My school was 60% nonwhite. Half the student body was very interested in the case.
The prosecution and LAPD did an absolutely atrocious job on this case virtually all around. He deserved the acquittal in my book as much as I think it was possible that he was at least involved or at least aware of the two murders.
I concur.
Proof BEYOND a reasonable doubt is the constitutional standard.
The main evidence against him was the DNA. Damaging evidence for sure, but the chain of custody and how the initial cops preserved the crime scene was just so beyond a joke you couldn't put full stock in it. The cops literally covered the two bodies with bed sheets from a hamper if you can believe that.
Whoever killed Goldman should've been covered in blood. He was stabbed 30 plus times and fought his murderer to the point where he had bruising all over his knees and knuckles. He was a 6'2" 200 plus pound karate instructor in his 20's and 55 year old OJ dusts him and only ends up with a small scratch on his palm, a few droplets of blood on him and a few partial bloody footprints at the scene?
It's really only possible if there were more than one attacker working in well a coordinated manner. OJ certainly could've been one of those attackers and he certainly could've visited the crime scene at some point but it seems almost impossible given the 25 minute window of opportunity and the fact that the Nicole Brown murder seems premeditated but then OJ supposedly does the deed while waiting for his limo to come pick him up for the airport? How can it be premediated and hasty at the same time and yet there isn't a mountain of evidence against OJ if he was the perpetrator?
All this. I also remember the blood vial taken from a prior DUI was nearly empty, and the blood spatter tested on the back gate was found to contain the same preservative as the DUI test vial.
I was watching in a crowded room at work the day they announced the murders and started convicting OJ in the media with LAPD evidentiary talking points. Popular opinion had him hands down guilty right there.
I however disagreed. “Have you never seen Perry Mason?” I asked.
I won a $100 bet when he was acquitted. Clarke and Durden were inept. The evidence was mishandled, etc.
Add to all that my personal knowledge of OJ’s pad being an LAPD party house. Lots of drugs, sex, drinking were going on. Rumors swirled that Nicole was having an affair with a certain detective figuring prominently in the investigation. Nicole and Faye were dealing kilos of powder and had crossed the line with their suppliers. Goldman was allegedly involved with the dealing as well.
Nicole and Ron were killed by the cartel they owed 100’s of thousand in cocaine debt. They were amateur coke dealers to the elite in brentwood. Bad money management and she constantly wanted OJ to payoff her debts. Once he stopped paying they came and did what they do.
Whoever killed her was pretty clearly sending a message and this is basically the theory I head that had the most evidence behind it. She was a known habitual user among other drugs.
Prosecutors and cops alike have gotten extremely lazy. Rather than do their job well, they over-rely on technology, but more directly they rely on the jury selection process to be tilted in their favor and supply a compliant jury pool that's easy to manipulate.
I'm inclined to believe they tanked the case against OJ. There are plenty of credibly conspiracy theories involving drug trafficking that make exponentially more sense than "jealous celebrity goes on killing spree against ex wife."
It's also not only the sloppy case that gets my Spidey sense going, it's the totally fake "high speed" Bronco chase that was clearly orchestrated by the LAPD and mainstream media. Once you fake that and play it up anything is possible. Lots of parallels to both the Floyd case and Rodney King in that a lot of what is presented in the media is exaggerated, skewed and just plain complete bullshit.
Could be. I'll never dismiss out of hand the idea that the police could be involved in drug trafficking. Especially in southern California.
Lots of people have lots of $$reasons$$ to look the other way, even if they're not directly involved.
There's a lot of circumstantial evidence tying Nicole Brown at least indirectly to organized crime and drug dealing, one of the prevalent theories that seemed credible was about the restaurant she was invested in (and Goldman worked at) dealing cocaine and/or laundering money. At the bare minimum she was involved with people through investments that were involved in organized crime. OJ was as well without question. That's enough for me to think the whole thing was likely at least partially a charade.
I read Bugliosi's book about it, and one of the funny things he points out is that Marcia Clark helped sabotage the prosecution because she was painting him as a wife beater, which was more tolerated at the time in the black community. She wouldn't listen to shit, she was going to ramrod the wife beating aspect come hell or high water. Not to mention that Judge Ito was a shithead.
I totally agree on Clark, but Darden was no genius either. Honestly a huge mistake to put Clark out front and center to begin with on a couple different levels.
However, to be fair- wthout the wife beater angle they basically have no motive that they are presenting. The motive they went with was not very solid at all and pretty much hinged on OJ being a psycho jealous person who would kill her in a moment of passion. Which is a pretty convoluted story to be telling a jury in my opinion in the context of the actual alleged timeline of the murders.
One of the jurors is actually on record stating that the OJ verdict was revenge for the Rodney King verdict.
Every Western institution has promoted intense racial and ethnic tribalism among non-white peoples for decades. At the same time, these institutions have severely demonized any racial or ethnic tribalism among white peoples. The end result is our present situation: non-whites viciously attacking white peoples, cultures, and nations, none of which are permitted solidarity to defend themselves.
Wait till Derek Chauvin gets acquitted! The media will say the eruption of white supremacists rejoicing will be the cause for the upcoming riots!
I like the Chris rock routine about that. Something about how black people all thought they won something when OJ was acquitted. His joke was something like each day I keep checking the mailbox for my OJ prize but I haven’t gotten anything yet.
I was in college at the time the verdict was announced, there must have been a few hundred of is in the student union watching. When the words "not guilty" were uttered, I shit you not, all the white people threw their arms up in disgust and all the black people started yelling, cheering, throwing high fives, dancing on tables. It was as if we had watched two different trails.
This was the day shit started going sideways for America. I remember exactly the same thing.
YES. I have said this for so long. The OJ case was a pivotal, generational moment in our time when half of the population deemed reason and objective reality secondary to political power, if not disposable altogether.
Same here.
My school had black students celebrating in the hallways. One of my 'friends' later told me it was because they got together for weeks leading up to the verdict with other black students to watch black identity films to build up their anger.
Racism is very popular in the black community and most folks don't want to address it.
Now, I don't treat black folks any different than I do white folks. I just don't pretend to ignore their racism as a lot of folks do.
those people dont hate oppression, they hate that they are not the ones doing the oppressing. they are so full of hate and anger.
Ditto. White kid in a 90% black high school. Pandemonium.
They want tribal warfare as long as only their side is fighting. If the other side was fighting, they'd want nothing to do with tribal warfare.
ADOS Blacks are on the verge of extinction in the US. They can thank Democrats. Not "White Supremacists"
The narrative in the common ethno centric black household is white man racist. That's the driver of every moral and judicial decision and why we saw parades for Floyed and jubilation for OJ.
But they didn't make that up themselves. That narrative was developed by white regressives to control their vote.
Whites are already in a tribal war whether they like it or not. The faster they accept that the better.
Yeah, for them it wasn't about actual justice. A black man killed two white people so to them OJ did nothing wrong. Their version of justice was a clearly guilty black man beating the rap. For them, knowing that a guilty black man walked free was victory.
I guess we were in very different parts of the country. I was in junior high. The mood was completely somber and / or furious. EVERYONE knew he was guilty, and was getting away with murder for political reasons.
"it's our turn"
I remember that shit too.
When I was in High School when this happened... nothing happened. Nobody gave a shit.
Have you seen the video where he admits grabbing the gun and slips in that interview?
Yup,, they want warfare, that's for sure
Funny how I was 11 years old and I never considered race playing a factor in the verdict. I just thought they were wrong.
Maybe I was just naïve, or maybe as a white male I just hadn't truly embraced my biological predisposition to being a racist white supremacist.
It's always interesting to revisit events from childhood with the wisdom of adulthood. I used to think the OJ verdict was a case of a very rich man getting away with murder. Now I know it was a case of black jurors gleefully refusing to convict a black man of killing white people.
I was in middle school and I remember everyone crowded around the 1 tv on a cart. Everyone erupted in joy when it was announced while me and like one or two other kids were not.
No one ever gives a fuck when a black murders a white or even if a black murders another black, but god forbid a white kill a black. Then it's definitely muh wHiTe SuPreMaCy!!!!
"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views."
Opinions vary
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1Pevb9LdIy8
Funny, I remember this as well.
I also remember the Scott Peterson charade on Nancy Grace. It was years later I learned about Peterson actively cooperating with the police and all of the counter evidence that was never mentioned on T.V.
Same story, tribal warfare, just from the opposite side.
A lot of people don’t understand that tribalism Is what got there ancestors enslaved.
To be honest, OJ was right though. His wife was cheating on him with his friend. Does everyone forget that part?
Doesnt give him the right to kill them though. Also OJ had a well documented history of uncontrollable anger.
I argue that it does. Even if it was premeditated.
The true impact of diversity initiatives.
The blacks where I was were also very jubilant.
I repeat: Because the slave doesn't want to be free. He wants to be master.
Understood?
OJ 100% did that shit.
I'll be honest, I think it 100% stems from embedded racism where the white man is always bad and thus any time something "doesn't go in favor of the White man", for lack of better phrasing, it is cause for celebration amongst those too smooth brained to see past their own self-defeating thoughts.
A lot of it stems from alternate history and education of black children both at home and in public schools.
A child wonders: why does my life suck?
Well it's not your mom's fault, even though she got knocked up at 15 and dropped out of school and doesn't work and leaves you with Grandparents while she goes out every night.
It's not your dad's fault, even though he ditched your mom, also dropped out of high school, sold drugs to make an easy buck, got pinched and served hard time, can't get a job with his record...
So who is to blame?
Whitey. Slavery. Someone, anyone else. You tell this fairytale to your kid late at night so he doesn't hate you for being a piece of shit, and he buys it because he loves you. If he knew how selfish you were, he might not. But he's not going to hear anything else at our converged schools or in our converged media.
Truth is a cold hard bitch.
Problem. Reaction. Solution.
Joggers gonna jog
I was in middle school at the time and my science teacher was so ANGRY he lectured the class on what an absolute travesty it was and that justice was not served. That is all I remember about that day and I didn't see anyone happy about it. The next year when we moved though... 😳
Those people are todays democrats.
They hate justice
well, who told you OJ murdered anyone? (let the downvotes commence)
It’s amazing that people still haven’t figured out that there was a reason black people were segregated and given less rights than whites. They’re tribal, will always be tribal, will also hate you for not being black, and will act like animals because of the aforementioned fact.
American politics is now NON-WHITE vs. WHITE.
The left is implementing a race war ... and they're coming for your guns.
Plan accordingly.
Of course. The LA county prosecutor threw that case so it wouldn’t be Rodney King riots part 2. Come on. Moving it to downtown. The jury. The rookie prosecutors. The phony witnesses. This was a 2 day trial at best. Blood, shoe prints. Escape plan. The prosecution rests. Now prove he didn’t do it dream team.
Nicole Kidman was killed by a cartel. Her and her boyfriend owed quite a bit of cocaine money and OJ refused to pay the tab again.
That fucker Tom Cruise is the one who ordered it.
Again with that shit? Give it a rest will you. Go back to reddit now. Go on. Scram.
The entire justice system is a sham. The idea that people can get off murder and other serious crimes on technicalities even if it's clear that the person is 100% guilty shows that actual justice is not the most important thing. The legal system cares more about its own rules than finding truth and administering justice.
I was in middle school and we all cheered
We were stupid as fuck.
damn. I guess my school was based. There was no cheering. There was only silence and anger.