The prosecution and LAPD did an absolutely atrocious job on this case virtually all around. He deserved the acquittal in my book as much as I think it was possible that he was at least involved or at least aware of the two murders.
The main evidence against him was the DNA. Damaging evidence for sure, but the chain of custody and how the initial cops preserved the crime scene was just so beyond a joke you couldn't put full stock in it. The cops literally covered the two bodies with bed sheets from a hamper if you can believe that.
Whoever killed Goldman should've been covered in blood. He was stabbed 30 plus times and fought his murderer to the point where he had bruising all over his knees and knuckles. He was a 6'2" 200 plus pound karate instructor in his 20's and 55 year old OJ dusts him and only ends up with a small scratch on his palm, a few droplets of blood on him and a few partial bloody footprints at the scene?
It's really only possible if there were more than one attacker working in well a coordinated manner. OJ certainly could've been one of those attackers and he certainly could've visited the crime scene at some point but it seems almost impossible given the 25 minute window of opportunity and the fact that the Nicole Brown murder seems premeditated but then OJ supposedly does the deed while waiting for his limo to come pick him up for the airport? How can it be premediated and hasty at the same time and yet there isn't a mountain of evidence against OJ if he was the perpetrator?
Nicole and Ron were killed by the cartel they owed 100’s of thousand in cocaine debt. They were amateur coke dealers to the elite in brentwood. Bad money management and she constantly wanted OJ to payoff her debts. Once he stopped paying they came and did what they do.
The prosecution and LAPD did an absolutely atrocious job on this case virtually all around. He deserved the acquittal in my book as much as I think it was possible that he was at least involved or at least aware of the two murders.
I concur.
Proof BEYOND a reasonable doubt is the constitutional standard.
The main evidence against him was the DNA. Damaging evidence for sure, but the chain of custody and how the initial cops preserved the crime scene was just so beyond a joke you couldn't put full stock in it. The cops literally covered the two bodies with bed sheets from a hamper if you can believe that.
Whoever killed Goldman should've been covered in blood. He was stabbed 30 plus times and fought his murderer to the point where he had bruising all over his knees and knuckles. He was a 6'2" 200 plus pound karate instructor in his 20's and 55 year old OJ dusts him and only ends up with a small scratch on his palm, a few droplets of blood on him and a few partial bloody footprints at the scene?
It's really only possible if there were more than one attacker working in well a coordinated manner. OJ certainly could've been one of those attackers and he certainly could've visited the crime scene at some point but it seems almost impossible given the 25 minute window of opportunity and the fact that the Nicole Brown murder seems premeditated but then OJ supposedly does the deed while waiting for his limo to come pick him up for the airport? How can it be premediated and hasty at the same time and yet there isn't a mountain of evidence against OJ if he was the perpetrator?
Nicole and Ron were killed by the cartel they owed 100’s of thousand in cocaine debt. They were amateur coke dealers to the elite in brentwood. Bad money management and she constantly wanted OJ to payoff her debts. Once he stopped paying they came and did what they do.