1931
Comments (72)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
krzyzowiec 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was never a good argument for the lockdowns. You see all the coincidences as well as the rest of us. (Why was it ok to gather in a large group at Walmart, but not a smaller group in a restaurant?)

They will not give up power willingly. They will try to codify it if they can using something like vaccine passports. People will comply because they think it will be over if they give in. (hopefully not, but we’ll see)

Then later they will realize that just like the flu, which mutates, we are dealing with a virus. There is no permanent solution. There will always be new strains that can justify a return to lockdowns, or a reason to be kept up to date on your vaccinations.

It will not end because people have been too weak to stand up to it so far. The people in power see that fear has worked so why stop?

I’m assuming that if things continue as they are, this is just the first step towards a social credit score system like China has. They will train us to carry vaccine cards that must be kept up to date or we face penalties like the lack of ability to fly or conduct business.

Over time it will be expanded to include other rewards or punishments depending on behavior, and it will be justified in the name of health or security.

Notice how they keep saying that stronger voter ID is racist or suppression? Why do they do that? You can obviously point to a place like India and say, how can it be racist if they do it over there? There is no logical justification for that position.

The reason they keep saying it is because people fear the R word more than anything, and they will submit if you attack them with it.