203
Comments (32)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
AlexWin1939 4 points ago +5 / -1

My biggest issue is cancel culture here quickly attacked her, labeled her a RINO, never to be heard from again. She saw issue with the language that would lead to the bill being cancelled in a court of law relatively quickly, said fix it, the legislature said NO, so now she has done an EO.

So is she fucking a Mitt Romney now?? Of course not. I just don't understand why so many here were quickly damning her to the wastebin of RINOs.

Money matters, so while we can beat the hammer about the NCAA what about just fighting the fights we can win easily, and with little recourse. Protect the children first, then we can protect the young adults because in college that is what you are, legally.

2
Jackietreehorn 2 points ago +3 / -1

I dunno. I saw some of that too. Low info voters exist all around.

In my opinion, it was a concerning to me that it appears she did what her donors told her to do, bc she went from enthusiastic to sign it to radio silence for 2 weeks then a Friday afternoon news dump. She's done a good job as governor, but the best thing about Trump was that he wasn't for sale. I'm not saying she needs to go, just I'm keeping a close eye on her going forward (as we should with everyone)

0
Comntrinchief 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dude, she explained exactly why she wanted free language changed and said multiple times it was in consultation with attorneys taking into account the legal strategy the NCAA would use to fight the proposed legislation.

She didn’t backtrack after donors pressured her. That is what the moron fake news claimed as an attack on a based conservative governor knowing full well many low info Republicans would believe it.

Now she has done what she could by EO because for what reason I don’t know, the Republicans in the legislature refused to work with her. Why wouldn’t they work with her and modify the language? What reason did they give for disagreeing with her legal counsel? So they even think strategically about these things when drafting legislation?

1
Jackietreehorn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your clear position is that she is right and they are wrong. She's not the queen she's the governor. Good for you I guess. Oh no the scary ncaa will fight this. No shit. You're not making any more arguments besides that she talked to lawyers (chamber of commerce lawyers) and they said no so it's no. If that's all you need then I've got a bridge to sell you. There's all kinds of lawyers with all kinds of interests. So what if you have a daughter who is in high school. Great at softball, talking to d1 schools about scholarships. Turns out she just doest meet the cut because they found a handful of players who can straight up hit the ball out of the park (because they are men). Tough luck. No scholarship. It's the ncaas world we just live in it tough luck sweetie Jeffrey sorry I meant Jessica really is a great hitter! Don't be transphibic honey I'm sure you'll figure something out.

They'll fight what she passed anyway.

1
Comntrinchief 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t know who is correct here regarding legal strategy. Who does know? All I know is she didn’t cuck out like is being claimed. If she wanted to cuck out why did she sign the EO? The last thing I am going to believe is reactionary articles bashing her for her reasoned approach. She has remained consistent and doesn’t this EO prove that? The legislature can propose a new law that addresses her concerns. Why wouldn’t they do that?