They're using the gender versus sex argument. They're still wrong. Any decent scientist will realize that so few people identify as neither male or female that they are a statistical anomaly. Albeit a very vocal one. There is a perfectly good way of identifying a child's gender at birth. It is the same as their sex, about 99.9% of the time and that is good enough for scientists and statisticians.
They're using the gender versus sex argument. They're still wrong. Any decent scientist will realize that so few people identify as neither male or female that they are a statistical anomaly. Albeit a very vocal one. There is a perfectly good way of identifying a child's gender at birth. It is the same as their sex, about 99.9% of the time and that is good enough for scientists and statisticians.