The Constitution actually personified slaves for the first time, even if it was only 3/5 of a citizen, and just for the purposes of representation. But still, that was wildly progressive for the 1700s, when slaves were just considered property.
The left has such a fucked up view of the world. Everything has to be negative. They completely lack the ability to look at history through the lens of the culture at the time, they just assume it was always 2020.
The 3/5 law, the 13th amendment, wasn't in the original documentation. I'm not sure it could even be used as an argument for racism, because it was ratified in 1866. So it is no longer valid (and was only valid for less than 100 years).
People might not know that the NYTimes supported Communism in Russia and Stalin explicitlyn long after the truth, which they made every effort to hide, was known to the West.
They have been and still are literal genocidal Communists.
This is not new with them. The fact that they're even taken seriously as a reporter of reality by anyone just goes to show that once you contrl what people can know and what the narrative is, you have incredible, durable power you can wield with virtual impunity.
Trump's right We need to rework the liable laws. We shoudl also work through a theory where their knowing and deliberate lies to their readers are actionable. The 1st Amendemnt (which they hate btw) is not a suicide pact.
Constitution isn't sold in big box retailers so they cannot cancel it.
Right. It's in our hearts and minds and as long as people such as ourselves live, it lives.
The Constitution actually personified slaves for the first time, even if it was only 3/5 of a citizen, and just for the purposes of representation. But still, that was wildly progressive for the 1700s, when slaves were just considered property.
The left has such a fucked up view of the world. Everything has to be negative. They completely lack the ability to look at history through the lens of the culture at the time, they just assume it was always 2020.
The 3/5 law, the 13th amendment, wasn't in the original documentation. I'm not sure it could even be used as an argument for racism, because it was ratified in 1866. So it is no longer valid (and was only valid for less than 100 years).
People might not know that the NYTimes supported Communism in Russia and Stalin explicitlyn long after the truth, which they made every effort to hide, was known to the West.
They have been and still are literal genocidal Communists.
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2018/08/02/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-dumb-ss-f-ing-white-people/
This is not new with them. The fact that they're even taken seriously as a reporter of reality by anyone just goes to show that once you contrl what people can know and what the narrative is, you have incredible, durable power you can wield with virtual impunity.
Trump's right We need to rework the liable laws. We shoudl also work through a theory where their knowing and deliberate lies to their readers are actionable. The 1st Amendemnt (which they hate btw) is not a suicide pact.
Damn, lock this bigot up with only toilet paper to write on.