Are there any mathematic pedes here who could play devils advocate and explain how this might not be 100% proof? I've watched the video twice now and it's extremely convincing.
I am mathmatical and I understood everything in the video.
The only way this can't be true is if the physicist manufactured these graphs rather than got them from official source of data. I still need to do it myself to check. But this seals the deal if the data is legit.
Are there any mathematic pedes here who could play devils advocate and explain how this might not be 100% proof? I've watched the video twice now and it's extremely convincing.
I am mathmatical and I understood everything in the video. The only way this can't be true is if the physicist manufactured these graphs rather than got them from official source of data. I still need to do it myself to check. But this seals the deal if the data is legit.
Thank you!