33
Comments (6)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
DickweedDewine 1 point ago +1 / -0

Didn’t she just come out recently and say the only reason she “took these cases was to prove how outrageous the claims were” and “how only fools could believe it” ? I’m confused. 👀

2
mightiest_m 2 points ago +2 / -0

She basically said that nobody believed she was stating it as pure proven fact, because it requires the court to look at all the evidence gathered to decide on that, but she still stands by her evidence and conclusions 100%.

Clearly all the fake news this decried she was using "the Fox news defence" and didn't believe her own claims.

1
neosin [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

that was fake news

1
Mintap 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, when she said things like "this was the worst crime in history," it is true that reasonable people consider that hyperbole.