The article has one fundamental flaw. It PRETENDS that the Constitutional Rights of citizens under the Republic still matter. It PRETENDS that the courts will safeguard these recognized (not granted) rights.
The Republic DIED when the Election was STOLEN so the lawsuit will change NOTHING.
We live under tyranny now and most of us just keep PRETENDING it's just politics.
That is bullshit. Why hasn't she released any of the fool proof evidence after the courts didn't listen to her case? If she had any real physical evidence (like the german server that she allegedly sent military personell to retrieve) she could have swayed public opinion and forced the courts to listen. Instead she kept her mouth shut and now she wants us to protect her.
Fuck her, I say. She wanted her minute in the spotlight and our money.
She's a Lawyer and not a Politician. You want her to reveal all her sources so the ENEMY can silence the witnesses and destroy the evidence before the case gets to court.
She may be naive about the chances of a court permitting a fair hearing, but that's the mindset of a lawyer. A mere loudmouth wouldn't care about winning a case as long as there were upvotes.
Excuses excuses. She could have leaked the info, or sent the evidence to a trusted news source. If she had any real evidence and wanted us to know about them she would have gotten it out to us one way or the other. If they had attempted to silence it, remember the Streisand effect.
The article has one fundamental flaw. It PRETENDS that the Constitutional Rights of citizens under the Republic still matter. It PRETENDS that the courts will safeguard these recognized (not granted) rights.
The Republic DIED when the Election was STOLEN so the lawsuit will change NOTHING.
We live under tyranny now and most of us just keep PRETENDING it's just politics.
That is bullshit. Why hasn't she released any of the fool proof evidence after the courts didn't listen to her case? If she had any real physical evidence (like the german server that she allegedly sent military personell to retrieve) she could have swayed public opinion and forced the courts to listen. Instead she kept her mouth shut and now she wants us to protect her. Fuck her, I say. She wanted her minute in the spotlight and our money.
She's a Lawyer and not a Politician. You want her to reveal all her sources so the ENEMY can silence the witnesses and destroy the evidence before the case gets to court.
She may be naive about the chances of a court permitting a fair hearing, but that's the mindset of a lawyer. A mere loudmouth wouldn't care about winning a case as long as there were upvotes.
Excuses excuses. She could have leaked the info, or sent the evidence to a trusted news source. If she had any real evidence and wanted us to know about them she would have gotten it out to us one way or the other. If they had attempted to silence it, remember the Streisand effect.