I read a white paper about the new mrna vaccines. Most of it was way over my head, but the gist I got from it was this. Based on what I read, genetic diversity pre-vaccine offered various levels of resistance to the virus. Now, post-vaccine everybody will have the same vaccine created spike protein receptor, if I'm understanding it correctly. Does this not build in a common denominator weakness to those vaccinated? So say the Chicoms wanted to build a second version of the virus, wouldn't they now know exactly how to formulate it for maximum infection compatibility? This seems like an extremely bad idea. Am I totally wrong on this?
Comments (2)
sorted by:
I am not a scientist by any stretch but that's what I understand too. And they are keeping it open, just because you've done it once or twice already doesn't mean you're not gonna need another one each time they find a variant. And I don't trust that they aren't just trying to make us need them more.
Also I think the Pfizer is probably the deadliest thus they tested it on the Israelis. And the Australian one sounds hella terrible too. I don't want any of them.
Yes.