202
Comments (23)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-17
tellittothedead1 -17 points ago +2 / -19

That means nothing. He wasn’t caught in a crime and he was senselessly murdered by two vigilantes. His history is irrelevant in this case.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
-7
tellittothedead1 -7 points ago +1 / -8

Yea no. While you’re correct, I disagree with the defense. I don’t think anyone jogging deserves to be shot, unless he was actually committing a crime. These are two good ol’ boys trying to do what the cops should have done, then they had the cops code it up. Fuck that.

6
OGpsywar 6 points ago +6 / -0

He wasn't shot for 'suspicion of casing a future robbery', ..

he was shot for (read to the end) ..

being a known sketchy fucker, whom the local police had referred area residents, and the out-of-state owner, to former cops for better handling,

and when those people .. recommended by the local police .. tried to detain the fucker until the cops arrived (just 30 seconds later), Aubrey attacked a man and tried to wrest control of the man's 12 guage shotgun,

Aubrey failing to steal control of the other person's weapon, but getting shot twice during his attempt.

TLDR, Aubrey committed suicide by clearly changing direction, running at, and trying to attack someone holding a shotgun.

Frankly the changes to state legislation over this matter is ridiculous. The highest notice necessary should have been a Darwin Award.