202 () posted 15 days ago by roscoeSteele 15 days ago by roscoeSteele +202 / -0 23 comments share 23 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (23) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ -17 ▼ – tellittothedead1 -17 points 15 days ago +2 / -19 That means nothing. He wasn’t caught in a crime and he was senselessly murdered by two vigilantes. His history is irrelevant in this case. permalink save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – Cesare_Borgia 7 points 15 days ago +7 / -0 That's not true at all. He wasn't senselessly murdered, he was shot after going for one of the men's guns. Should they have been following him? Probably not. But it's not like they shot him randomly for no reason. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Jaybone86 1 point 15 days ago +1 / -0 State will make the case that he was being detained against his will thus Arbery was acting in his own defense. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – OGpsywar 5 points 15 days ago +5 / -0 He was never 'detained'. He -- at a full run --committed felony battery on a man holding a shotgun to aid his attempts to elude. permalink parent save report block reply
That means nothing. He wasn’t caught in a crime and he was senselessly murdered by two vigilantes. His history is irrelevant in this case.
That's not true at all. He wasn't senselessly murdered, he was shot after going for one of the men's guns. Should they have been following him? Probably not. But it's not like they shot him randomly for no reason.
State will make the case that he was being detained against his will thus Arbery was acting in his own defense.
He was never 'detained'. He -- at a full run --committed felony battery on a man holding a shotgun to aid his attempts to elude.