Comments (11)
sorted by:
3
OrthamVega 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nice name still not takin it faggot. You are even by your so called dashboard im more likely to die of the shot than COVID I’m not capitulating jack shit.

1
capitulation [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

My argument is to not take the vaccine. This data come from the government so this at least what they are admitting too. Why the fuck roll the dice on minimum 1 out of 25k chance of death for no reason.

1
OrthamVega 1 point ago +1 / -0

well with a name like that and a handshake you must be aware we are flooded with shill accounts.

3
WainiacS 3 points ago +3 / -0

My perfectly healthy 62 year old neighbor passed away 1 week after receiving the Vaccine - However, His wife say's that had nothing to do with it (DemoLib). Would he be on this list if a family member doesn't believe its relevant?

1
capitulation [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not necessarily, this is only data reported to VAERS. The Vaccine Event Reporting System run by the CDC at VAERS Website. The data can be self reported, but it is typically reported by medical professionals that suspect a vaccine adverse event.

2
tellittothedead1 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s a low number

2
Wait_For_It 2 points ago +2 / -0

Except for the 1904 and their relatives.

-1
tellittothedead1 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Yes. It’s too bad. Unfortunately it’s part of healthcare.

2
capitulation [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is low, but they are admitting to this in the open. I found it shocking since the narrative is it is 100% safe.

1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +1 / -0

They should admit in the open and no one should say anything medical is “100% safe”. Only a fool would say or believe that. I don’t know how that compares to other vaccines as far as where the limits for “unsafeness” are (my phraseology) though. And you’re correct.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0