3697
Comments (295)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
75
NPC11011110000 75 points ago +75 / -0

You know they're scared when they start dropping the Liberal focus group buzz words like "QAnon".

"Federally accredited"? What the hell does that mean? The feds are partly responsible for this debacle. We do not want the foxes to be investigating the goings on of the hen house.

43
MAGAnic316 43 points ago +43 / -0

It’s exactly the point though, that’s their tactic. No one but the government are allowed to investigate whether the government did anything wrong.

Muh cReDiBiLiTy

20
doug2 20 points ago +20 / -0

Just like how the FBI "investigated" the DNC leak? Aka received a redacted copy of their internal report and called it a day.

If you would like to know more the real source of the leak was Seth Rich. I prove it, along with a lot more, in my book. No, really. Cant advertise here though :/

31
residue69 31 points ago +31 / -0

The Small World of Voting Machine Certification

A deeper look into the certification process used for the machines, however, reveals that the main certification agency in the United States, the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC), maintains an unexpectedly small staff, and one of its chief employees is a former executive of Dominion Voting Systems.

19
TwoPlusTwoEqualsFour 19 points ago +19 / -0

Sounds like treason is back on the menu boys.

21
anon1011101 21 points ago +21 / -0

There are hundreds if not thousands of people who need to hang over the theft of the 2020 election. Hang every single one of them, down to the section 8 ghetto trash Shaniquas who were changing ballots in the counting centers

8
TwoPlusTwoEqualsFour 8 points ago +8 / -0

Let this be a reminder to ye.

7
SFSilentNoMore 7 points ago +7 / -0

Jesus help us.

3
CrackerJack2 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is key!
This Election Assistance "Commission" and the companies used to "certify" these machines need to be torn down and inspected a hundred different ways.
In the end, the ONLY way for any real election honesty is IBM-type punch cards and manual or mechanical counting.

3
marishiten 3 points ago +3 / -0

We need to end the Election Assistance Commission completely.

Go back to paper ballots. No more machines. All hard ballots are kept on record for 8 years. They're required to be scanned and uploaded to servers after the election forever. Those scans can be viewed by submitting a FOIA. Anyone can submit. It doesn't cost anything to file FOIA.

All voter rolls are purged every election. It should be unlawful to be able to use previous years voter rolls. Vote harvesting should be illegal in all states. Absentee voting should be kept to an absolute minimum. I'm talking like 0.6% tops. Anything more automatically triggers audits. Any adjudication (shouldn't need it with paper ballots) over 1% should trigger and audit.

6
DaayTerkErJerbs 6 points ago +6 / -0

The only people allowed to investigate Democrats are Democrats. If anyone investigates Democrats who isn't a Democrat they're biased partisan hacks. In order to run an investigation without biased partisan hacks you MUST have Democrats investigate Democrats... <-- Liberal Logic.

-2
Deathtoallmarxists2 -2 points ago +3 / -5

Your just as moronic as they are though if you think there is anything liberal about leftists.

6
anon1011101 6 points ago +6 / -0

Semantics. People know what you mean when you call someone a "liberal" these days

3
SordidPontification 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, the people he should be taking issue with are the self-described "liberals" that are actually Marxists hidden behind a thin veneer called "Democrat."

1
mikethemarine 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm still trying to decide what country your from, cause a liberal here, used to mean a middle of the road conservative, which means peoples rights protected and liberties protected, it now means Communist/ Marxist control in america, it's a word change to get more supporters