Well if there is any legitimacy to Lindell and Fanning claims, then there will be alot of dysinformation put out there. Hard to know what this is at this point.
I think Lindell has some good people involved and I think some of them have the goods. But I think Fanning and Montgomery are grifters and are going to fuck up the real stuff with their con job bullshit thrown in with it.
Perhaps, but I have to think that Lindell isn't stupid enough to just put shit out there without having some third parties check it out. Also, the fact that certain affidavits were signed, etc, it makes me skeptical, but more likely to believe them. I don't trust some random guy on the internet (the one in your link) who also purports to be an insider. It can be a psyop, easily. So, I'm not convinced yet.
Like I said, I don't trust some rando on the internet. The gateway pundit is mediocre at best. They do a lousy job over all. Perhaps, C- or D+. I'm not saying your'e wrong but having her as producer may or may not be relevant.
Also, I don't know what stole the election, but it wasn't simply the rcv feature on the machines. That's too obvious. Whether it was hammer and scorecard, or they simply hacked in, it doesn't matter. Those things were insecure. Furthermore, on his new video, the physicist shows a 6th degree polynomial for the data, which in a way was independently confirmed (or he confirmed it first) by Edward Solomon. So, it doesn't matter the specifics, the machines were hacked. It goes beyond the feature inherent to the machine.
You obviously don't. Your name makes you look like an obvious troll. "I support Lindell and Free and Fair Elections... but there's no real proof! Aww, woe is me. We's screwed!"
The article is garbage which only insists it's right.
But what Mary Fanning presents as “evidence” is built on a fabrication. It is not real. And actual cyber experts, including Yaacov Apelbaum, can confirm this.
Who qualifies what a "Cyber Expert" is? Larry Johnson?
A bit of 5D chess here but it is possible some info in Lindell's video is wrong on purpose so that the bad guys think they are safe? You should never tip you hand so in order to do that Lindell would need to allow some fake info into his video.
Yes, Lindell is in over his head. Hopefully he can do some good anyway. Fanning and Montgomery may be in over their heads too. Not everybody who is wrong is lying. Some are lying (e.g. Lin Wood, "Jovan Hutton Pulitzer"), some are legit crazy (e.g. Patrick Byrne, and probably General McInerney), and some are just over-eager and in over their heads.
Watch Lindells latest "Scientific Proof" its pretty compelling, it doesn't focus on the voting system rigging rather the indisputable unnatural trends you would only get with artificial manipulation of the votes.
At this point then, now that I know FOR SURE that Lindell is on the money, anyone trying to discredit him or affiliates is Opposition.
I'm not saying he's lying, but I've been getting an off feeling about him ever since his testimony in GA. I'm hoping he's not a grifter and that it's just his personality rubbing me the wrong way. If he's truly on our side, I wish him the best of luck.
As for some of the other names listed above, I don't think most of them are grifters. We've been sitting on mountains of evidence, and I think they were just blindsided by the inaction of the judicial system just like we all were.
I wasn't arguing. I made it clear that it was a feeling and that I might be wrong about it. I'm not suggesting anyone else change their mind about Jovan, just that I haven't made up my mind about him.
He's had legit people on.Have you been to college (asking sarcastically)? Some of those dudes are fucking brilliant, but nut-bags and a little 'off-kilter'. Lindell has also had Shiva on and others. He's not having people with no credibility on. I do think Sydney knew alot more than she could say.
Yeah, I work with people like that which is why I'm still open to the idea that I may be wrong about him.
I think it was when he was saying, "We're in!" It was like the senators were trying to get more details about what he meant, and he kind of dodged the questions. It may be that he knew it in his head but couldn't get it into the right words.
There was also the engineer senator that was trying to get clarification through Jovan's testimony, and Jovan kept talking down to him. It doesn't give me confidence, but it may just be a personality issue.
I do agree with that. He did come off as smug in that instance, and I didn't appreciate him speaking to the engineer like an idiot. I agree. Again, perhaps a personality thing, or perhaps he's trying to make his points in given time.
I read a post over at UndercoverDC today that has given me new insight into Wood’s and Powell’s tactics. The short of it:
They can claim Dominion is a public figure.
Thus Dominion must prove malice to win (higher bar).
Powell and Wood have been careful to stick to the details in the affidavits (and in Wood’s case his crazy Roberts stuff is word for word from the transcript of his whistleblower). The affidavits are sworn under penalty of perjury. They have every reason to believe they are true. Thus malice will never be proven.
Dominion will be stuck between a rock and a hard place. Drop a suit they can’t win and they look guilty. Can’t fight discovery easily since they are plaintiffs and they get screwed. Fight the suit all the way and lose, they look guilty.
I was worried those two had gone insane. Rethinking that now....
Well if there is any legitimacy to Lindell and Fanning claims, then there will be alot of dysinformation put out there. Hard to know what this is at this point.
I think Lindell has some good people involved and I think some of them have the goods. But I think Fanning and Montgomery are grifters and are going to fuck up the real stuff with their con job bullshit thrown in with it.
And Lindell is clearly wrapped up in their con.
Perhaps, but I have to think that Lindell isn't stupid enough to just put shit out there without having some third parties check it out. Also, the fact that certain affidavits were signed, etc, it makes me skeptical, but more likely to believe them. I don't trust some random guy on the internet (the one in your link) who also purports to be an insider. It can be a psyop, easily. So, I'm not convinced yet.
This is Larry Johnson.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/author/larryj/
The fact that Mary Fanning is a listed Executive Producer of Scientific Proof makes me think she and Montgomery have Lindell under their spell.
Like I said, I don't trust some rando on the internet. The gateway pundit is mediocre at best. They do a lousy job over all. Perhaps, C- or D+. I'm not saying your'e wrong but having her as producer may or may not be relevant.
He didn't link to TGP. He linked to a free blog site.
Right. What's TPG?
The Gateway Pundit.
This might help tie it together:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/larry-johnson-hammer-scorecard-real/
Also, I don't know what stole the election, but it wasn't simply the rcv feature on the machines. That's too obvious. Whether it was hammer and scorecard, or they simply hacked in, it doesn't matter. Those things were insecure. Furthermore, on his new video, the physicist shows a 6th degree polynomial for the data, which in a way was independently confirmed (or he confirmed it first) by Edward Solomon. So, it doesn't matter the specifics, the machines were hacked. It goes beyond the feature inherent to the machine.
Hey who is Edward Solomon?
Why didn't you post that first?
🤷
And he has a shitty typepad blog site? Unfortunately, for you, TGP supports Lindell.
Doesn’t suck for me. I support Lindell too. I just think he’s getting suckered and I worry about him.
You obviously don't. Your name makes you look like an obvious troll. "I support Lindell and Free and Fair Elections... but there's no real proof! Aww, woe is me. We's screwed!"
The article is garbage which only insists it's right.
Who qualifies what a "Cyber Expert" is? Larry Johnson?
A bit of 5D chess here but it is possible some info in Lindell's video is wrong on purpose so that the bad guys think they are safe? You should never tip you hand so in order to do that Lindell would need to allow some fake info into his video.
hmmm
Old news. Lindell knows he'll get called on Montgomery, has a lot more ammo than just Montgomery.
I hope you are right!
Mary Fanning is listed as an executive producer of Scientific Proof. JFC.
Yes, Lindell is in over his head. Hopefully he can do some good anyway. Fanning and Montgomery may be in over their heads too. Not everybody who is wrong is lying. Some are lying (e.g. Lin Wood, "Jovan Hutton Pulitzer"), some are legit crazy (e.g. Patrick Byrne, and probably General McInerney), and some are just over-eager and in over their heads.
Watch Lindells latest "Scientific Proof" its pretty compelling, it doesn't focus on the voting system rigging rather the indisputable unnatural trends you would only get with artificial manipulation of the votes.
At this point then, now that I know FOR SURE that Lindell is on the money, anyone trying to discredit him or affiliates is Opposition.
I liked the evidence presented but I wished Mike would have shut the fuck up and let Dr. Frank present more details.
The main problem is Mary Fanning is listed as an Executive Producer in this one. She’s bad news.
how is Jovan Lying?
As far as I know, he isn't. Dude is brilliant and perhaps a little quirky
I agree
I'm not saying he's lying, but I've been getting an off feeling about him ever since his testimony in GA. I'm hoping he's not a grifter and that it's just his personality rubbing me the wrong way. If he's truly on our side, I wish him the best of luck.
As for some of the other names listed above, I don't think most of them are grifters. We've been sitting on mountains of evidence, and I think they were just blindsided by the inaction of the judicial system just like we all were.
Arguing with feelings is a feminist tactic. "I feel like you're cheating on me and that's why I keyed your car."
I wasn't arguing. I made it clear that it was a feeling and that I might be wrong about it. I'm not suggesting anyone else change their mind about Jovan, just that I haven't made up my mind about him.
The dude is gambling his own blood and treasure. How can you feel bad about him?
Like I said, it may just be his personality.
Yeah, Minnesotans seem inherently evil... like Pa Ingalls!
I think it's his personality.
I'm open to that possibility.
He's had legit people on.Have you been to college (asking sarcastically)? Some of those dudes are fucking brilliant, but nut-bags and a little 'off-kilter'. Lindell has also had Shiva on and others. He's not having people with no credibility on. I do think Sydney knew alot more than she could say.
Yeah, I work with people like that which is why I'm still open to the idea that I may be wrong about him.
I think it was when he was saying, "We're in!" It was like the senators were trying to get more details about what he meant, and he kind of dodged the questions. It may be that he knew it in his head but couldn't get it into the right words.
There was also the engineer senator that was trying to get clarification through Jovan's testimony, and Jovan kept talking down to him. It doesn't give me confidence, but it may just be a personality issue.
I do agree with that. He did come off as smug in that instance, and I didn't appreciate him speaking to the engineer like an idiot. I agree. Again, perhaps a personality thing, or perhaps he's trying to make his points in given time.
I read a post over at UndercoverDC today that has given me new insight into Wood’s and Powell’s tactics. The short of it:
They can claim Dominion is a public figure.
Thus Dominion must prove malice to win (higher bar).
Powell and Wood have been careful to stick to the details in the affidavits (and in Wood’s case his crazy Roberts stuff is word for word from the transcript of his whistleblower). The affidavits are sworn under penalty of perjury. They have every reason to believe they are true. Thus malice will never be proven.
Dominion will be stuck between a rock and a hard place. Drop a suit they can’t win and they look guilty. Can’t fight discovery easily since they are plaintiffs and they get screwed. Fight the suit all the way and lose, they look guilty.
I was worried those two had gone insane. Rethinking that now....
This guy says, "Fuck you!"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_McInerney
And he has a distinguished record. You're a random guy on the internet.
Who I am is irrelevant.
Who Larry Johnson is, is relevant. And the linked article is quite a take down of Dennis Montgomery by Larry Johnson.
Larry Johnson was a basketball player aka Grandmama. Charlotte Hornets.
You're linking to a free blog. You ARE irrelevant.
Yes, I am irrelevant. I thought we already agreed to that.
And you link to a site any idiot can post on... such as yourself.
We know you're self-promoting your free blog. Not allowed.
Reclaiming my stolen point.
Reclaiming my stolen point.
Reclaiming my stolen point.
Reclaiming my stolen point.
Reclaiming my stolen point.