759
Comments (29)
sorted by:
15
drmrboy 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's not a vaccine ... don't forget it.

3
leg_hairs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is that why they keep calling it a "jab" so they aren't technically claiming it's something it's not? As if "jab" is an appealing word anyway...

3
strictly1957 3 points ago +4 / -1

Wisely stated.... its a beta run for the big one. All good Doggos getting chipped!

1
PedeInADeepBlueSea 1 point ago +1 / -0

And they don't provide a timeframe either, just imagine how many problems these people will encounter in a year from now.

1
spelunking_librator 1 point ago +1 / -0

can smell shit clinging to the air

12
ObongoForPrison2020 12 points ago +12 / -0

Does anyone else hate the word “jab” as much as I do?

10
fapoo [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

YES. They are trying to make out it's a small thing. Just a jab, nothing to worry about. Just a jab, won't hurt.

Years later...

2
tiberseptim37 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's all about context. I wouldn't want a "jab" from Iron Mike in his prime under any conditions.

1
spelunking_librator 1 point ago +1 / -0

don't worry about the jab, it's nothing, it's basically like injecting pure water

5
2008RonPaul2012 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah. I have a family member that used to live in the UK. He uses the word "stick" too. Let's give it some cutesy name and focus on how it only hurts for a second to avoid talking about the potential long term harm.

1
Cmchn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Propaganda always uses catchy, easily- repeated words and slogans.

1
Jabron661 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same as calling dogs "doggos" and other such soy based language.

5
Moebius 5 points ago +5 / -0

When one controls the adverse affects database one can control the number of adverse affects. We all know they doctored the actual China Virus numbers...EVERYWHERE...

4
YesMan 4 points ago +4 / -0

These are not just 'blood clots' they are strokes and they admit it in this article

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Hambonemcgee 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wonder what we will be saying about the vaccines in a year?

1
spelunking_librator 1 point ago +1 / -0

trunalimunumaprzure

3
Hiiighone 3 points ago +3 / -0

Theyre measureing success from the number of people who didnt die from the virus if the vaccine was effective at all 99.9% of the people who would die from the virus wouldnt but the virus has killed the same number with or without it..... Pretty much like saying airbags in someone elses car help you survive when you crash your car no matter what

1
Kingoftheroad 1 point ago +1 / -0

From the numbers I saw there is about a 10% chance of either dying, having permanent disability, or life threatening effects from the vaccine so far. Week after week it's between 9% and 12% or something close to that.

1
spelunking_librator 1 point ago +1 / -0

of all the millions and millions of airbags installed in cars which never crashed, your's who didn't work in a crash is 0.0001%... mafs

1
Hiiighone 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh fuck you mean i could die?? Better get one of those airbag suits just in case

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
ravioli_king 3 points ago +3 / -0

In the USA no one has recovered from covid. Think about that. Those stats don't exist, yet they exist for other countries.

2
Stanford 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where did you read 99.9?

1
Hiiighone 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you guys not want the vaccine...im pretty sure in every commercial about getting it they say it was proven safe AND effective

1
Chaotikizm 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wu Flu Confucius say: Where there is optimism, there is omission.

1
ThorsonTT 1 point ago +1 / -0

It keeps tigers away too! Seen any tigers around lately?

1
MAG_n_KAG 1 point ago +1 / -0

its not the insta death im worried about. its the potential long term effects. who knows whats in that shit?

1
spelunking_librator 1 point ago +1 / -0

what, u no like skin peeling off?