100 years ago, Bolshevik Jews used Russian peasants to attack the kulaks, a class which was marginally better off. A kulak may have owned a plot of land or a few cows. The kulak wasn't rich and had no power.
Today, Bolshevik Jews are using peasants (black and brown) to attack American middle class whites. A middle class white may have a small plot of land and a few cars. The middle class has no power and isn't rich.
"Racism" is used to protect the brown peasants while they attack the white middle class. So if you say things like "black culture = shit" then people call you a racist, rather than contemplating the possibility that black culture as commonly observed is a cancerous tumor on humanity.
Brown people are just human shields for the bolsheviks. It's that simple, and they're too dumb to see the "carrot" is fake. Most whites came here after the civil war. Imagine thinking we give a shit about slavery. lol. fuck you buddy.
Anyway -
The purpose 100 years ago was to take the kulaks' wealth. The Russian peasants never got anything. They were worse off under Stalin than the Czar.
The purpose now is to take the middle class's wealth. The brown peasants won't get anything. They'll be worse off under Communism than now.
So that's what we're up against. White people should secede. Do it virtually where possible and then do it in reality.
Not a Stalin fan by any means, but if you think peasants were worse off under him than the czar, you are not informed on Soviet history. Even well-known academic critics of the Soviet system like Sheila Fitzpatrick (who wrote 'Everyday Stalinism' about peasant life under Stalin taken from their voluminous letters to authorities) agree that life was marginally better across the board under authoritarian bureaucratic centralism (Stalin's particularly odious brand of 'communism') than under the Romanov dynasty's feudal agrarian estates. Distribution was dismal and the black market thrived, but not nearly as bad as during imperial times. The Soviet Archives confirm this, and if you believe they prove the Holodomor happened, then they also have to prove you wrong on Stalin v Romanov rule.
100 years ago, Bolshevik Jews used Russian peasants to attack the kulaks, a class which was marginally better off. A kulak may have owned a plot of land or a few cows. The kulak wasn't rich and had no power.
Today, Bolshevik Jews are using peasants (black and brown) to attack American middle class whites. A middle class white may have a small plot of land and a few cars. The middle class has no power and isn't rich.
It is really this simple.
It is really this simple.
It is really this simple.
Pity few bother to read the history books! Good point though.
"Racism" is used to protect the brown peasants while they attack the white middle class. So if you say things like "black culture = shit" then people call you a racist, rather than contemplating the possibility that black culture as commonly observed is a cancerous tumor on humanity.
Brown people are just human shields for the bolsheviks. It's that simple, and they're too dumb to see the "carrot" is fake. Most whites came here after the civil war. Imagine thinking we give a shit about slavery. lol. fuck you buddy.
Anyway -
The purpose 100 years ago was to take the kulaks' wealth. The Russian peasants never got anything. They were worse off under Stalin than the Czar.
The purpose now is to take the middle class's wealth. The brown peasants won't get anything. They'll be worse off under Communism than now.
So that's what we're up against. White people should secede. Do it virtually where possible and then do it in reality.
Not a Stalin fan by any means, but if you think peasants were worse off under him than the czar, you are not informed on Soviet history. Even well-known academic critics of the Soviet system like Sheila Fitzpatrick (who wrote 'Everyday Stalinism' about peasant life under Stalin taken from their voluminous letters to authorities) agree that life was marginally better across the board under authoritarian bureaucratic centralism (Stalin's particularly odious brand of 'communism') than under the Romanov dynasty's feudal agrarian estates. Distribution was dismal and the black market thrived, but not nearly as bad as during imperial times. The Soviet Archives confirm this, and if you believe they prove the Holodomor happened, then they also have to prove you wrong on Stalin v Romanov rule.