1933
Comments (111)
sorted by:
96
Kramit 96 points ago +99 / -3

Go get them batards!

21
magastrophysicist 21 points ago +31 / -10

I know you didn't mean to have that typo, but it made me think of this:

BAT-TARD, buh duh duh duh duh duh duh duh

BAT-TARD!

(PedoJoe dresses up like a bat on the weekends. Brings out his true vampirish demonic nature.)

Edit: who downvoted this lmao

Edit 2: two people can't take a fucking joke. Probably shills. Fuck off!

Edit 3: four people. No life losers.

Edit 4: six people. Keep 'em coming, literal retards.

16
Kramit 16 points ago +16 / -0

No but that is funny! Fucking new phone autocorrect sucks balls. I had an iPhone for 15 years and since Apple cucked I switched. Of all iPhone faults their autocorrect works very well if you ask me.

5
magastrophysicist 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hah! I figured you didn't do it. Lots of shills on this website recently. I've been here for over a year and it's the worst it's ever been.

-1
RussianBot4Trump -1 points ago +0 / -1

Switched to what? A phone embedded with Google’s Android OS?

1
Kramit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably. Not a techie but I did dump Google Chrome etc from it etc. I do what I can lol

16
romanhelmet 16 points ago +16 / -0

DOWN VOTERS ARE BATARDS!

7
magastrophysicist 7 points ago +7 / -0

Batard Joe supporters, too!

4
Kramit 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've accidentally created a monster lol

3
inspir3dgenius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Monsters are what's on reddit. You created an ideal version of this post.

4
romanhelmet 4 points ago +4 / -0

MAKE SURE YOU COPY PASTA THE BATARD POSTS FRENS

3
Kramit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Would a "batard" be someone that believes the Chyna virus came from a bat?

2
Marshall2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought it meant Creepy Joe was hit by a girl wielding a BAT and that's why he's a (Re)TARD.

3
SaltiTaralli 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like your style.

2
magastrophysicist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks! Doing my best.

0
Petes_Agate_Israel 0 points ago +3 / -3

I downvoted you for editing your post 4 times over fake internet points.

9
ChuckedBeef 9 points ago +10 / -1

"No Standing! I Like Beer!" -Trump's SCOTUS Mistake #2

1
starboard 1 point ago +2 / -1

A bastard in French is a batard.

3
EndTheFedReserve 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pick up some extra batards for me!! I'm having spaghetti tonight and forgot the damn batards!

59
Marshall2 59 points ago +61 / -2

When are people going to realize that every branch of Government and every Agency of government has been compromised and will only yield the results it's Oligarchs dictate. Biden and Harris are only their puppets and useful idiots.

25
Global_Tornado 25 points ago +26 / -1

Seriously. All we have are the state goverments and those are all being run by meek boomers that have no fucking clue what is going on.

21
AmericanPatriotPride 21 points ago +22 / -1

They know what’s going on. It’s called fucking you and the rest of us with as much anal brutality as possible. And get paid for it:

2
AnointedVisions 2 points ago +3 / -1

Lets get into office!

7
Ben45 7 points ago +7 / -0

still gotta fight back

7
Marshall2 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's not about whether to fight back. It's how you can effectively fight back. The courts are a waste of time because they do not offer relief or even a hearing.

Change the name to Department of Injustice.

1
Desert_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Start putting down activist judges and politicians. That is the effective route. Where ever chynuh monies go, lead follows.

0
QLARP 0 points ago +1 / -1

William barr lol

6
Ishaye 6 points ago +6 / -0

They pretend we reside in a republic still. This is far from that now.

People warned everyone you don't just ask for your rights back and get them. It takes buckets of blood, sweat, and tears to get rights back.

3
honk_honk_honk 3 points ago +3 / -0

The buckets are proportional to how long it drags out. Same deal throughout most of history, in many different situations - Hitler was terrified the French would show up when he marched troops into the Rhineland in 36 in violation of the Treaty of Versailles, it was too early on and he wouldn't actually have been able to beat them if they attacked, they could have steamrolled the Germans who were still in the process of arming up and seized him.

The French didn't show up because they were afraid to provoke him into war.

2
Ishaye 2 points ago +2 / -0

People that have it too good don't realize until it's too late when it goes very very bad.

31
Anon331717 31 points ago +32 / -1

Please tell us this isn’t some bullshit pro Se lawsuit that anyone can file in a DC for $400.00....

29
starsabove 29 points ago +31 / -2

Unless I'm missing something, thats a really shitty article. What 'Group'? Is it state affiliated or private? Where can one read the details of the suit?

A group in Texas is filing a lawsuit against all members of Congress, among others. They are asking for a new presidential election and an injunction on the current administration.

That's the entire article.

26
CovfefeNegro 26 points ago +32 / -6

https://www.m90usa.com/

The PDFs describing the suit are there, it isn't 'shitty' at all, don't be afraid to go look.

Takes less time to GO THERE than it does to whine you weren't spoon fed in here. Whining instead of looking into it yourself makes everything 'shitty', prolly.

Jes sayin'.

https://files.catbox.moe/e4h2uj.jpg

5
starsabove 5 points ago +7 / -2

I'll check it out, but why wasn't that information put in the article?

-2
CovfefeNegro -2 points ago +8 / -10

Ya jes cain't help some folks.

It 'was' in there, all you had to do is read it.

But I gave it to you again, and here you be still whining, even asking 'me' why it wasn't in the article...

C'mon man, reddit is over yonder <.

https://files.catbox.moe/2kb5eq.jpg

11
starsabove 11 points ago +11 / -0

Nah dude. There was no M90USA group in that article. Again, this is the entire article.

A group in Texas is filing a lawsuit against all members of Congress, among others. They are asking for a new presidential election and an injunction on the current administration.

Thats it. There's no mention on which group, who they're affiliated with, what makes their suit different, etc. Its just those two sentences. Even tweeted press releases have a URL shortener to the full article.

0
CovfefeNegro 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's in that article every time I click on it, maybe karma is censoring you.

https://files.catbox.moe/rpuycp.png

1
starsabove 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're clicking on a different article then. As I've pasted above, the article is just those two sentences. Nothing else. Which is probably the suit doesn't seem to be getting any traction or attention.

0
CovfefeNegro 0 points ago +1 / -1

I click on the same one posted, the 'only' one posted but ok, sure, have it your way.

Say you wouldn't be shilling would you?

I mean, ya just can't help some people, ya know?

https://files.catbox.moe/e4h2uj.jpg

10
Forbidden_outcast 10 points ago +10 / -0

It’s really not there. I’ve even opened in different browsers. There’s 3 circular hyperlinks in the only paragraph, but they’re as useful as the current press secretary.

Not sure where you are seeing the information, but it is not available for everyone to see, for whatever reason. We get one video and one paragraph with 3 nonsensical hyperlinks

4
ZyramRo 4 points ago +4 / -0

I also didn't see anything but that paragraph. Appreciate the links though

1
CovfefeNegro 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's there every time I look, just 10 seconds ago it is there .

Maybe you're not loading the whole page or something, or maybe you're on a phone, I don't know but it's there in comments right under the picture.

You do have to read it to see it, but there it is, boom there it is, boom there it is...

Sorry, PC, win 10, Brave, VPN... it's there.

https://files.catbox.moe/22yvu1.jpeg

1
Forbidden_outcast 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comments? That clarifies a lot.

But I clicked on comments after you reading this..... and you have to have an account to even read them

1
CovfefeNegro 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm a computer halfwit, it's there for me is all I can tell you...

https://www.m90usa.com/

https://files.catbox.moe/i4medo.png

1
Monz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea. This looks kinda dumb.

20
AmericanPatriotPride 20 points ago +20 / -0

Awesome. Get ready for a ruling from SCOTUS that says “no” with no explanation. At some point here states need to get serious about secession. Taking our money with us will break them.

3
Btcox 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sctous is too busy playing angry birds to rule on the fate of our country

2
DontDoxMeBro1 2 points ago +2 / -0

t h i s

16
Redpill-notCommieRed 16 points ago +16 / -0

I felt like the first Texas lawsuit had the best chance but I don't have faith that the courts will fairly hear any case now about the election.

Best of luck to you and the case though! I do hope that justice prevails and the Democrats get hit with everything they have coming to them.

14
SynisterBaconLord 14 points ago +14 / -0

Inb4 SCOTUS rules "moot"

12
Filo76 12 points ago +12 / -0

Or “no standing”. Or maybe they’ll make up something else this time.

4
spelunking_librator 4 points ago +4 / -0

they went from 2 words to 1 to now 0

2
603win 2 points ago +2 / -0

The ruling from the bench is a fumble. The lawsuit was ruled dead upon contact with the ground on the way to the council chambers. The result of the play, first down Democrats.

10
Latin_Patriot_MAGA 10 points ago +10 / -0

Good luck.

if you guys need to shoot some bullets, count on me and a couple of friends

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
Rhondevu85 7 points ago +7 / -0

The only hope I see of this taking any action is if a Federal judge (not Supreme) can provide injunctive relief. I’m convinced the Supreme Court has been compromised so it would have to be a lesser known federal judge to provide injunctive relief.

7
fjzappa 7 points ago +7 / -0

mumble mumble no standing mumble mumble.

I would like for the courts to define who, in the case of election fraud, WOULD have standing?

1
wethedownvoted 1 point ago +1 / -0

Someone in the comments claiming to be one of the lawyers says it's a class action on behalf of ever American

6
tiberseptim37 6 points ago +6 / -0

I anticipate the Swamp's response to be something like...

"That's cute." *continues to destroy America*

6
Handypatriot 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fuck yes

5
BilRoGar 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's just a flex. The enemy knows this will get companies, people and other organizations to move to Texas for perceived freedoms. And then California it all up for who knows what.

5
KAG2020WIN 5 points ago +5 / -0

You think they are going to hear your case?

1
MehNahMehNah 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ya just gotta keep punching at it. And punching, and punching...

2
disgruntled_patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

... at a wall that will never be knocked over with your fist. You'll only end up with a broken and bloody fist.

the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result.

4
RussianLimbaugh 4 points ago +4 / -0

Let us know if there’s any way we can help. You know we will!

4
RussianBlyat 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can you give a TL;DR for the legal case? Also, how can one sign on as a party to the suit?

3
AlcoholicRetard 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why would our court system start giving a shit now?

3
Hambonemcgee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good luck.

3
NazisWereSocialist 3 points ago +3 / -0

SCOTUS is corrupt, it wasn’t a matter of having the right lawsuit filed no?

3
Pumpitrealgood 3 points ago +3 / -0

Davis 3/31/2021 at 4:49 PM −

My name is Paul Davis, and I am the lawyer for this lawsuit. You can find all the most up-to-date information on our lawsuit at www.M90USA.com. Sign up for email alerts. If you want to volunteer for the bus tour to serve the lawsuit in DC and help organize the DC rally, please email [email protected]. We need all the help we can get to fight the political establishment and take our country back from the rich elites!


3
Metro 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh thank goodness! It’s finally over, justice will prevail! Wow we did it, we will finally win. All legislative and judicial institutions in America will bow and tremble, ye there will be gnashing of teeth. Trump will come back to DC in a golden chariot....

3
Trumpy_Bear 3 points ago +3 / -0

OK, if shit like this is necessary, then how do we have a Union anymore? We don't. So why do you idiots keep poopooing the idea of a split/secession/state-level-fovernment resistance?

2
Inno262 2 points ago +2 / -0

No standing or moot change my mind.

2
InterloperKO 2 points ago +2 / -0

Godspeed

2
Global_Tornado 2 points ago +2 / -0

How to force supreme court to accept?

2
disgruntled_patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only at gunpoint.

1
OldHickoryJackson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Explain what gives it legs.

1
Jooktz_the_third 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lindelltv.com has a new video up. And more to come this week. They figured out the algorithm, used the 2010 census numbers for voters. Nothing will change until we get rid of these machines

1
Pumpitrealgood 1 point ago +1 / -0

good, keep on fighting, keep pushing, we need to fix 2020, we can not rest until it is fixed, we can never allow cheaters on this large scale to win. We need to show the world that the USA stands for something, and cheating, lying, charlatans need to be made an example of. LETS ROLL

1
STIDGIT64 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will testify that Pedo Joe cheated

1
HenkZeilstra 1 point ago +1 / -0

Supreme court have no fucking balls, they are corrupt

1
DZP1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Supremes: "Moota la la la moota la la, I can't hear you!!! Rejected, because Texas isn't a state of the Union! They're a foreign country named Texghanistan!

1
Roof_Korean 1 point ago +1 / -0

WE NEED PARTITION. IT'S OVER LET'S JUST SPLIT AND LEAVE BEFORE THE POUR 100M ILLEGALS INTO OUR STATES.

1
CrankHandler1991 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let us know if the court decides to hear the merits before getting us excited

1
shadows_of_the_mind 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don’t do this. Don’t give me hope like that. Please. I’ve already moved onto acceptance - acceptance that our country was willingly sold out to a communist occupation.

1
Forbidden_outcast 1 point ago +1 / -0

In the comments? That’s clarifies a lot

But I tried to read the comments after you mentioned it and you have to have an account

1
c0mpl3x 1 point ago +1 / -0

In before no standing

1
Industry4 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you!

1
SaltiTaralli 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there any reason that millions of Americans can't join in on this law suit?

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

No chance in hell. Lol.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

personally involved? ya'll touchin' dicks or somethin'?

1
fingis_dartan 1 point ago +1 / -0

yawn looks like the Bernie bro “he can still win” meme.

1
AnointedVisions 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sue me!!!

Actually Arizona is getting some momentum with the audit. I'm not getting my hopes too high, but they're moving

1
BumpForTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Awesome news. Apologies if I am not jumping in celebration here. I dont have much faith in our judiciary system. I think too many judges are more worried about politics and optics. Hell, even our supreme court are a bunch of spineless cowards and that is where any of this will end up at the end of the day, anyways, right?

Also, it's not smart to annouce your intentions so far ahead of time. This leads me to believe its a show. Why give them so much time to arrange the destruction and the intereference everyone and their grandmothers know is about to happen.

1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +1 / -0

This will be thrown out quicker than Anything

1
NukeChina 1 point ago +1 / -0

All that will happen here is that you will be finding a new way to be told to fuck off by the legal system.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SenorTrumper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gawd, I hope this one pans out!

1
TheAmericanImmigrant 1 point ago +1 / -0

The SCROTUM is compromised. Do you firmly believe they will do their jobs this time around?