Most senior Officer in Minnedishu PD says that it is lethal force to put your knee on someone's neck. They have never been trained to do this with someone handcuffed behind their back while in the prone position.
He further states that simply being handcuffed with your hands behind your back makes it hard to breathe, and being in the prone position would make it even harder to breathe. For this reason once someone is handcuffed with their hands behind their back you get their chest off the ground. (GF's chest was on the ground the whole time) He said you usually get them on their side or sitting.
This came before the break at 10:45 local time, probably after 10:15.
He further states that of the 5 levels of force, once you have someone handcuffed behind their back you immediately drop to the lowest level of force and threat, the perp can't really hurt you, while they can still kick you can get out of the way.
Cross-examination should be interesting!
He also establishes that the Officer who handcuffs a perp immediately becomes responsible for their well being. I point out that if Chauvin didn't handcuff GF, this adds a wrinkle to the case.
Dunno, it's the defense argument. Of course its biased towards that. People made it seem like chauvin crushed floyd's wind pipe and that's not the case. Yea, you can still make it harder to breathe by riding someone's lungs.
Problem is I've never seen this angle until the trial and it makes one think it was more opioid than chauvin.. like 80% OD and 20% restricting breathing.
No way he is getting murder 1. The slow roll medic response and exactly when they were called has potential to get dude a manslaughter or negligent homicide charge, I can see that sticking.
Not the biggest cop fan but from my interactions they are more interested in getting you into the system to farm you for money than hurting you and causing trouble for themselves.
Murder 1 isn't charged. The most serious crime the jury could convict for is murder 2. So far I'm just trying to sort out if Chauvin really did anything criminal or not.
If it's determined that drugs and police action both contributed to death Idk how the law is supposed to work. Should that be enough to create doubt = innocence?
Ambulance was called before the first video we saw had started. Hard to claim negligence about that. Continuing the restraint instead of starting CPR about 4:30 before paramedics arrived might be found negligent? Right now that seems like the worst case scenario for Chauvin, assuming justice means anything.
Anybody thinking GF's windpipe was crushed, the autopsy proved otherwise. I don't think you can do that through the back of the neck, people aren't so easy to kill. From the front? The throat is certainly a weak spot but flat pavement doesn't reach up and grab you.
Autopsy shows the condition of the heart such that death from not breathing CAN cause it, but do we know his heart didn't fail first? This might prove to be really important in determining criminal culpability.