Some of our other based mathematicians have found pieces of the fraud, (Dr.Shiva, Bobby Piton, Jim and Joe Hoft....etc.) but Dr. Frank seems to have found the core algorithm to the whole nation! And it dove tails perfectly with all of their earlier work.
Probably a lot of you pedes are burned out with “almost” discoveries, but (if he's correct) there seems to be no wiggle room on this one. Or, at least....I want to hear why you think there is.
Watch it and get that energy up to spread it! Especially to state reps again like we did with all the other fraud info (because pedes are the absolute top-shit fraud-hunting hotness!).
And if he's wrong, somebody else needs to disprove him pronto.
‘Scientific Proof’ https://lindelltv.com/
I like Mike Lindell, but I wish he would have someone else host the presentations. Just when the person being interviewed is about to get to the major point he is trying to explain, Mike always interjects and jumps to a further point that tries to summarize without getting to address the meat of what the other person is attempting to get to. Totally confuses me. I want to hear the expert explain his data, not get 80% into it, then have Mike L. interject and not let him tidy up his point so I can understand. I follow exactly what his guests say, and it sounds really interesting and encouraging and understandable, then right when the point is about to be made, Mike jumps in and starts rambling about something that doesn't tie up what the guest was getting to.
Totally upsetting. Need Joshua from Epoch TImes to handle these interviews.
Fair, but I would put forth that Mike has a real 'down home' approach that can reach a lot of folk that don't go in for highfalutin jargon. Tradeoffs.
Yes, I totally get that. His approach may work for many but if you want to absorb the data and understand it, he cuts you off right at the moment of truth! LOL
All fair. This guy will probably go on all the internet shows now. And that will be awesome because he can show more of the research on each.
updoot for using "highfalutin"
I agree
I agree. But Edward Solomon found the algorithm first. And he discovered a high degree polynomial for the election curve and data.
Did he also use it on the 2010 Census data like Frank? This seems the missing link to me. But this is the culmination of so many great minds. It's a proud moment for Americans, really.
So Solomon didn’t use the census data. He didn’t necessarily need it. He had the precinct data from the swing states, and the times in which they reported the totals. He had the actual data. He knew the “bean counters” based their numbers on something, but didn’t know specifically. Meaning that there were internal numbers the democrats knew or predicted, but didn’t know what they used.
That’s only one parameter of the 6th degree. Not 6 individual parameters though. The curve fits with 0.999 and 1.000 R value. That’s statistically significant. Highly. Also If you think they’re going to represent with a quadratic equation, you’re crazy. Furthermore, this has been, in some ways independently verified by Solomon.
That's right, it's the lack of deviation that is the thing. Projection vs actual. And seemingly (claims) it is reproduced as tightly consistently.
Shiva also figured out the machines flip votes. And the ratios were consistent
He did, he's a stud of epic proportions. History will show a trail of great minds working towards the big reveal. Fucking Team Avenger USA
Yup