Sure, if that were feasible, why not. But maybe it wasn't all that easy based on conditions, materials and a slew of other factors.
It may have been such that like a great meal, or dish, specific things needed to be manipulated or made to happen in order to achieve the ideal end result. In essence, the cook or chef is key to delivering a great product, or not.
Funny how many argue for evolution, yet we have yet to find the missing link. In essence, where is the half man, half ape, at least if you follow Darwin's bullshit.
The thing is most atheists think they're Darwin and Einstein just because they've heard of it and some of the basics.
Evolution is incredibly complex and while it might preclude Genesis being literal (which it obviously isn't nor does it make much sense for it to go into brutal detail explaining all the complex mathematics and processes of evolution to get the point across) it doesn't preclude a God. Why wouldn't a God that is so intelligent and powerful use evolution? There's far too much presumption.
Evolution is a fact. I use it myself and work with algorithms. It's perceivable everywhere. I would argue that if you believe in God you're denying his work by denying evolution. As someone who enjoys intellectual pursuits, it's not something that I would find entirely unintelligent. When I intelligently design, I use evolutionary processes sometimes. People pay me for it sometimes.
There's no sufficient deficit in the fossil record to disqualify it. That argument is like saying there isn't a galaxy because of the gaps between the stars. There's a good progression showing evolutionary steps.
Similar if people are treating Genesis literally and they believe in God I think that's said because Genesis has some interesting things to say and consider so if he is trying to speak to them they're struggling to translate.
I agree that taking the extreme positions is plain stupid. Those pushing evolution all too often are extreme beyond compare. I have my faith, and my religion but that does not mean that nothing else much matters. Logic, common sense, etc., come in quite handy very often.
A super being or God would obviously use everything and anything it, He, or they could to get the job done, as such, like a great chef, prepare the brew, know that it is complete and let it run its course. Sure, why not? Call it what you will.
All of it is quite engrossing, I agree, and all of it requires full open debate as compared to simply adhering to just religion, or just science, and or whatever dogma one may adhere to.
This aside, science which is all about the evidence, has yet to provide the remains of that half-man, half-monkey confirming all that Darwin and Wallace wrote about. Hummm, I wonder why? LOL
What if I said that Darwin was fully funded by some very wealthy banking interests in the old continent so long ago? There is just so much and of course, any time anyone is over the target, the prompt response is CT. LMAO.
Agree, that intelligent design only points a finger at some energy, power or entity that directed natural processes.
Why direct a process when you can make one that directs itself?
Sure, if that were feasible, why not. But maybe it wasn't all that easy based on conditions, materials and a slew of other factors.
It may have been such that like a great meal, or dish, specific things needed to be manipulated or made to happen in order to achieve the ideal end result. In essence, the cook or chef is key to delivering a great product, or not.
Funny how many argue for evolution, yet we have yet to find the missing link. In essence, where is the half man, half ape, at least if you follow Darwin's bullshit.
The thing is most atheists think they're Darwin and Einstein just because they've heard of it and some of the basics.
Evolution is incredibly complex and while it might preclude Genesis being literal (which it obviously isn't nor does it make much sense for it to go into brutal detail explaining all the complex mathematics and processes of evolution to get the point across) it doesn't preclude a God. Why wouldn't a God that is so intelligent and powerful use evolution? There's far too much presumption.
Evolution is a fact. I use it myself and work with algorithms. It's perceivable everywhere. I would argue that if you believe in God you're denying his work by denying evolution. As someone who enjoys intellectual pursuits, it's not something that I would find entirely unintelligent. When I intelligently design, I use evolutionary processes sometimes. People pay me for it sometimes.
There's no sufficient deficit in the fossil record to disqualify it. That argument is like saying there isn't a galaxy because of the gaps between the stars. There's a good progression showing evolutionary steps.
Similar if people are treating Genesis literally and they believe in God I think that's said because Genesis has some interesting things to say and consider so if he is trying to speak to them they're struggling to translate.
I agree that taking the extreme positions is plain stupid. Those pushing evolution all too often are extreme beyond compare. I have my faith, and my religion but that does not mean that nothing else much matters. Logic, common sense, etc., come in quite handy very often.
A super being or God would obviously use everything and anything it, He, or they could to get the job done, as such, like a great chef, prepare the brew, know that it is complete and let it run its course. Sure, why not? Call it what you will.
All of it is quite engrossing, I agree, and all of it requires full open debate as compared to simply adhering to just religion, or just science, and or whatever dogma one may adhere to.
This aside, science which is all about the evidence, has yet to provide the remains of that half-man, half-monkey confirming all that Darwin and Wallace wrote about. Hummm, I wonder why? LOL
What if I said that Darwin was fully funded by some very wealthy banking interests in the old continent so long ago? There is just so much and of course, any time anyone is over the target, the prompt response is CT. LMAO.