Well because they're right about evolution, it's an extremely strongly supported process and explanation for us taking shape. It's a bit like having people who believe all the celestial bodies orbit the earth. I start to observe a pattern when you have people like that a lot of the kind of people they attract aren't just people who understand evolution and care about sharing that to the best of their ability but that really only care about trashing the people with the weaker position to bolster their own sense of superiority.
To them it is not a class of people to share understanding with but to attack and they they feel they are allowed to, that they deserve it for being wrong as some twisted sense of justice that they are punishing people so it's alright to attack them.
What Darwin saw isn't just what he saw I see the same all around me. I've come to realise most people worshipping him don't see that.
The big reveals that most people are fake is when for example atheists suddenly wont touch Islam or completely ignore evolution, even biology or reality staring them right in the face as it applies to humans when it comes to sexual dimorphism or racial differences. Suddenly then nature isn't nature. Funnily suddenly then it's almost as if they do believe in intelligent design and boy is their non-existent God politically correct.
In reality nature is neither politically correct nor theologically correct.
And nature has no time or interest in BLM, or MSNBS, etc. Hey, do keep in mind that if life were free of humans, it would be all too boring. :D
Instead of fighting about Red or Blue, Dem or Rep, one religion v another, one nation v. another, humanity would be better off trying to figure out how to survive a massive meteor when it hits our planet, terra forming other planets, etc., etc., etc. And, that does not even include the current human impacting problems on this very planet.
I have to admit I find it somewhat amusing to see things like an atheist storm in to squash the creationists only to get squashed by an atheist that has at least bothered to explore the issues.
Most of them worship science and don't believe in anything outside of it and fail to understand its basic function. In philosophy and confronting reality science is merely a set of processes that extracts a subset of what we can possible know or be sure about. In effect it is the selection of the easiest problems.
Scientists like that because it makes them feel powerful, problems they can beat, enemies they can beat. They don't like to believe there's anything beyond that.
Things like religion and philosophy tackles harder questions often which may be impossible to answer or to know if it's the right answer.
Science offers questions where there is a process that can return your paper and give a green or a red tick. Science will mark your test for you. To people who worship science today if you can't see it with science or the question can't be marked then it doesn't exist.
Religion can have the problem of that all the answers to sometimes impossible questions are guesses, it's highly creative, filling the void with whatever you like because well, you can when it comes to mysteries.
IMO, exploration is primeordial. We are here not to merely exist but to experience this reality, to enjoy, to learn, to grow, etc. Far too many get caught up with being right, they have to be right, as though that was ultimately the most important issue.
Science has started to come around, whereby they actually confirm when they simply just do not know, or do not have the answer, and that is just fine. Worshiping anything blindly, be it science or anything else is foolhardy. I adhere to the theme of St. Thomas who had to touch, had to see, had to confirm before he believed his Messiah.
I don't agree that religion simply offers guesses, creative or otherwise when it comes to problems or issues that are not quite understood by science, or man, just yet. To me, this only proves how much more humanity has to go before we are ready for ascension, if that is what is truly in our future. Just look back and gauge where man was in the 1,500 as compared to where we are now. In fact, in cosmic time, man has overachieved dramatically in only 500, 400 or the past 200 years.
Religion can necessarily only offer guesses in these matters. When it comes to the unknowable that's all anything can offer. If that is not the case then it falls under the domain of knowledge or science. Science does not deal with the unknowable because nothing can.
When you have questions and answers the point of science is to be able to not only offer answers which would be guesses initially but also identify correct answers leaving you with knowledge rather than belief which is in the domain of religion.
If people understood the relationship between science and religion better both of which should fall under philosophy then science would make religion better by reducing the scope of belief to only those things which you can't know so you're not left guessing when you don't have to, only when you have to.
Science is worse than it has been for a long time in many respects. Culturally it has massively degraded. People treat it like a religion and in many respects it's now science in name only. One of the worse cases you can get is when you mistake believing something for knowing something.
The institutes of science cannot be trusted. Science does not take precedence and yet they are the authority on knowledge. Look at what they have done to the world. They screwed up and released a virus causing a pandemic. If you look at all their denials none of it is scientific. They're using authority, not science to protect their reputation and preserve public faith in their creed. While science is great you cannot separate it from the man. A person is always a person before they are a scientist.
The culture of science is moribund. You should see what people wrote two to three thousand years ago or what they were talking about in Greece. People today have no idea what science is yet still claim to follow it.
Well because they're right about evolution, it's an extremely strongly supported process and explanation for us taking shape. It's a bit like having people who believe all the celestial bodies orbit the earth. I start to observe a pattern when you have people like that a lot of the kind of people they attract aren't just people who understand evolution and care about sharing that to the best of their ability but that really only care about trashing the people with the weaker position to bolster their own sense of superiority.
To them it is not a class of people to share understanding with but to attack and they they feel they are allowed to, that they deserve it for being wrong as some twisted sense of justice that they are punishing people so it's alright to attack them.
What Darwin saw isn't just what he saw I see the same all around me. I've come to realise most people worshipping him don't see that.
The big reveals that most people are fake is when for example atheists suddenly wont touch Islam or completely ignore evolution, even biology or reality staring them right in the face as it applies to humans when it comes to sexual dimorphism or racial differences. Suddenly then nature isn't nature. Funnily suddenly then it's almost as if they do believe in intelligent design and boy is their non-existent God politically correct.
In reality nature is neither politically correct nor theologically correct.
And nature has no time or interest in BLM, or MSNBS, etc. Hey, do keep in mind that if life were free of humans, it would be all too boring. :D
Instead of fighting about Red or Blue, Dem or Rep, one religion v another, one nation v. another, humanity would be better off trying to figure out how to survive a massive meteor when it hits our planet, terra forming other planets, etc., etc., etc. And, that does not even include the current human impacting problems on this very planet.
I have to admit I find it somewhat amusing to see things like an atheist storm in to squash the creationists only to get squashed by an atheist that has at least bothered to explore the issues.
Most of them worship science and don't believe in anything outside of it and fail to understand its basic function. In philosophy and confronting reality science is merely a set of processes that extracts a subset of what we can possible know or be sure about. In effect it is the selection of the easiest problems.
Scientists like that because it makes them feel powerful, problems they can beat, enemies they can beat. They don't like to believe there's anything beyond that.
Things like religion and philosophy tackles harder questions often which may be impossible to answer or to know if it's the right answer.
Science offers questions where there is a process that can return your paper and give a green or a red tick. Science will mark your test for you. To people who worship science today if you can't see it with science or the question can't be marked then it doesn't exist.
Religion can have the problem of that all the answers to sometimes impossible questions are guesses, it's highly creative, filling the void with whatever you like because well, you can when it comes to mysteries.
IMO, exploration is primeordial. We are here not to merely exist but to experience this reality, to enjoy, to learn, to grow, etc. Far too many get caught up with being right, they have to be right, as though that was ultimately the most important issue.
Science has started to come around, whereby they actually confirm when they simply just do not know, or do not have the answer, and that is just fine. Worshiping anything blindly, be it science or anything else is foolhardy. I adhere to the theme of St. Thomas who had to touch, had to see, had to confirm before he believed his Messiah.
I don't agree that religion simply offers guesses, creative or otherwise when it comes to problems or issues that are not quite understood by science, or man, just yet. To me, this only proves how much more humanity has to go before we are ready for ascension, if that is what is truly in our future. Just look back and gauge where man was in the 1,500 as compared to where we are now. In fact, in cosmic time, man has overachieved dramatically in only 500, 400 or the past 200 years.
Religion can necessarily only offer guesses in these matters. When it comes to the unknowable that's all anything can offer. If that is not the case then it falls under the domain of knowledge or science. Science does not deal with the unknowable because nothing can.
When you have questions and answers the point of science is to be able to not only offer answers which would be guesses initially but also identify correct answers leaving you with knowledge rather than belief which is in the domain of religion.
If people understood the relationship between science and religion better both of which should fall under philosophy then science would make religion better by reducing the scope of belief to only those things which you can't know so you're not left guessing when you don't have to, only when you have to.
Science is worse than it has been for a long time in many respects. Culturally it has massively degraded. People treat it like a religion and in many respects it's now science in name only. One of the worse cases you can get is when you mistake believing something for knowing something.
The institutes of science cannot be trusted. Science does not take precedence and yet they are the authority on knowledge. Look at what they have done to the world. They screwed up and released a virus causing a pandemic. If you look at all their denials none of it is scientific. They're using authority, not science to protect their reputation and preserve public faith in their creed. While science is great you cannot separate it from the man. A person is always a person before they are a scientist.
The culture of science is moribund. You should see what people wrote two to three thousand years ago or what they were talking about in Greece. People today have no idea what science is yet still claim to follow it.