16
Comments (7)
sorted by:
2
marishiten 2 points ago +2 / -0

lul.

No, they're not.

A conflict with Russia would be catastrophic for everyone. That's the point. Russia isn't afraid to utilize scorched earth. They've done it before. They not worried about losing soldiers. They have a HUGE military stockpile buildup.

If Russia and NATO end up in a conflict, China will 100% enter the fray. Either to defend Russia, or play for their own side. So you'd have the US, China, Russia, UK, France all in a conflict with eachother. Those countries just so happen to have permanent chairs on the UN securities commission.

It'd almost certainly end in nuclear exchanges. Because North Korea is already insane. So is Iran. And the chaos of a large scale engagement would be just what they need to attack and cripple/wipe out the entire western world.

it's in everyone's best interest to avoid war with eachother. Because if we do go to war, we'll all die. Russia has zero love for deep state.

2
The_Sentinel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with most all you wrote but the fact remains that the Globalist bastards know NOT what to do to regain their footing. I directly refer to finances, as in their near complete monetary control over the entire planet.

That said, and if the Covid BS is not enough, or should fail as it is in America, they will move to the next chapter in their sick agenda related to control and power, over everything.

I have news for you. To the sick bastards that pull the strings on mopes like Resident Xiden, and Cameltoe and too many others like Macron, just as long as they are ok, and can live forever, they could not care one bit if several billion people died in a limited or full nuclear war.

2
marishiten 2 points ago +2 / -0

The issue with that is it's a HUGE gamble for them. It's large enough, that they would be insane to roll the dice on.

If a nuclear exchange takes place, everyone dies. Including them. And even if they got to their bunkers, what's the point of a deep state when there's no one left alive to rule over?

I'm sure, in their own warped view, that they would lament loss of life and they think they're doing something just and noble. No one is pure evil and knows they're evil. Not even Hitler. So I would assume there's a level of loss that they deem acceptable/unacceptable. And the high likelyhood of nuclear exchange would be something that would be unacceptable to just about everyone.

Except North Korea and Iran.

For their own power, control, plans, and existence, they would avoid that.

The ONLY thing I can think of that would have the push for a conflict like that is if they're real confident that they can stop Russia from launching. Either through hacking mechanisms, or through an EMP. But all those silo's are hardened and shielded. They would have to shock and awe the likes of which has never been seen before to get Russia stunned to the point they can push into their borders and take control of their control centers. I don't think Russians can be subjected to shock and awe.

It might be a "if I can't have it no one can" situation, but again, I don't think they're insane. I think there's a level of acceptable loss they're willing take. And with nukes, that loss would be EVERYONE.

2
The_Sentinel [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I understand your thinking but I do have to beg to differ.

These fuckers are EVIL beyond compare, PERIOD.

And, NO, they have ZERO remorse! Do you think they care that they ASSASINATED JFK, among others. Nope, not one bit. Do you think they care about the entire 911 incident and what they orchestrated? NOPE, not one bit.

Power and control is ALL.

1
AnIdahoan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Precisely, with the Biden Pentagon broadcasting to the world (albeit not outwardly) that they're not going to do jack shit, Russia has been bold lately.

1
Batou 1 point ago +1 / -0

Neutron bombs thin the herd. It's all planned.

1
aqua27 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nato fighting Russia that would last about 10 minutes. Send in the transgenders first