2453
Comments (120)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-2
buckfoomers -2 points ago +1 / -3

Violation of the violence portion of the content policy, not political.

2
christianknight 2 points ago +2 / -0

hate speech is violence

-3
buckfoomers -3 points ago +1 / -4

But that's not what's happening here. The takedown was for ACTUAL, STRAIGHT-UP, OVERT VIOLENCE. Get it through your skull.

1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

show me the political video that is violent

1
Slime-chan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well given that YouTube is a video platform it doesn't make sense to have a "violence" policy, unless you mean overt violence being shown in videos. Most of them don't have that. What we're trying to work into your doughy skull is that "violence" to them means "anything we disagree with". They the excuse "Well it's inciting violence" but it's made up. You can just say that, not have any coherent explanation why, and silence people who ask questions. Like what's happening now. Reason vs excuse, my guy.

-2
buckfoomers -2 points ago +1 / -3

It's not talking about inciting violence, the video was privated FOR THE OVERT VIOLENCE BEING SHOWN IN THE VIDEO. It's right there in the message. Remove the OVERT VIOLENCE and you're good.

1
Slime-chan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. In the message. Where is the violence IN THE VIDEO and I'll show you a thousand videos with worse that haven't been removed.

-3
buckfoomers -3 points ago +1 / -4

I haven't watched the video, and the video isn't removed.