2844
So true! (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by Fourth_stage ago by Fourth_stage +2848 / -4
Comments (297)
sorted by:
62
MythArcana 62 points ago +66 / -4

Tales of the Libtards.

3
DonJr2032 3 points ago +5 / -2

If anyone is wondering, there is overwhelming physical proof. Ignoring or dismissing everything around you and everything beyond you is your own decision, but there is most certainly physical proof any direction you observe

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
DonJr2032 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is precisely an accurate description. If anyone wants proof of this concept and enjoys reading/learning, I will recommend a book for you on the subject

54
slaphappy2 54 points ago +57 / -3

No, no, no. A leftard NEVER contradicts a Muslim, only a Christian.

11
RegularAmerican 11 points ago +15 / -4

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that an Arab thing? I had a good friend who was a Christian from Jordan but was palestinian. He spoke fluent arabic and could read/write in it too. I'm pretty sure people over there in his family especially older ones dressed that way.

Besides God is one thing we have in common with the muslims (as christians), that we don't have in common with an atheist. Of course our cultures are different but my point is were people of faith.

17
Liberty_Prime 17 points ago +20 / -3

Yeah, but only Islam teaches its people that spontaneously exploding in a crowd will give you a better afterlife.

Ramadan bombathon is the result of a Prophet who spread faith by force. Which explains why Islam isn't compatible with anything that isn't that particular strain of islam.

-5
TruthWillOut -5 points ago +2 / -7

"Yeah, but only Islam teaches its people that spontaneously exploding in a crowd will give you a better afterlife."

To be fair it does not.

4
Liberty_Prime 4 points ago +5 / -1

If the religion weren't interpreted and distributed by imams, you would be correct.

Unfortunately, the religion as it exists today DOES teach that.

If the Vatican taught Christians to do it, people would blame that VERSION of Christianity. And they would be correct to do so.

0
TruthWillOut 0 points ago +1 / -1

Imams are like any other persons, there are good and bad.

Just like the good and bad priests, etc.

Claiming that "Islam teaches its people that spontaneously exploding in a crowd will give you a better afterlife", while knowing it's false, as you admit yourself, set yourself up to be taken down due to that insincerity.

It's like the claim that "all Trumpers are racists!", which is not true. It's just a "smear" by someone who don't want people to see Trumpers as humans.

Most true Muslims are like most true Christians God fearing good people who want to live in peace and don't want to be bothered by governments or what have you.

And both actual Christians and Muslims can recognize charlatans claiming to be of a certain faith but who in reality is not, those "fake believers" who only are 'into religion' to get themselves money and power.

And then of course there are those who want to fool Christians and Muslims to kill each other.

"The propagandist's purpose is to make one set of people forget that certain other sets of people are human"

– Aldous Huxley

2
Liberty_Prime 2 points ago +3 / -1

Islam teaches people that dying in battle gives you a better afterlife.

That's the starting point.

Now interpretations vary from there. But people currently in the religion...and a VERY high percentage compared to say snake jugglers...agree with that type of martyrdom.

So try and wiggle sunshine out of shit again, but today's Islam teaches people to blow themselves up.

Just not all parts of it do.

1
Junionthepipeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Islam is violent pedophile crap.

-12
MrEvangelon1 -12 points ago +5 / -17

Sorry for pointing out, but Christianity was also spread by force.

13
clearsighted 13 points ago +14 / -1

The first several hundred years of Christianity's existence was as the religion of slaves and outcasts on the fringe of society, practicing very nearly perfect non-violence in the face of persecution. The conversion of Constantine was seen as a miraculous and unexpected event.

By comparison, the first couple hundred years of Islam's existence was a jihad spread with the sword. Mohammed and all the other Caliphs were leaders of armies and military campaigns, knowing only pillage rather than suffering.

1
MrEvangelon1 1 point ago +2 / -1

Good points

4
DonJr24 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also, the crusades to the Middle East were in response to Muslim expansion into lands previously controlled by the Byzantines.

3
MegoThor 3 points ago +4 / -1

Maybe it was a mistake to ever stop.

0
Liberty_Prime 0 points ago +2 / -2

I worded my statement to allow for that.

2
MrEvangelon1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Misread it. Sorry.

After reading it, I realized Sunnis and Shiites are similar to Baptists and Episcopalians, but Baptists don't go boom.

3
Liberty_Prime 3 points ago +4 / -1

Geographically separated branches of Islam commit violent acts for their faith regularly.

It's a very common thing that ignores race. This evidence strongly suggests that it's the ideology of Islam that causes the violence.

1
MrEvangelon1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Too many patterns to ignore.

3
CGIDreams 3 points ago +3 / -0

If anything, Sunnis and Shiites are more similar to Catholics and Protestants.

2
clearsighted 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sunni and Shiite differences are far deeper, meaningful and more visceral.

1
MrEvangelon1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Theyare similar because they are sects of the same religion.

-2
Farmerbob1 -2 points ago +3 / -5

Christianity was spread by force, yes, but as non-Islamic religions have become civilized, they have also become less violent.

There is a difference. An enormous difference between the world only 100 years ago and today. Go back 200 years, and things get drastically different. A thousand years? Violence was the rule everywhere.

6
Joesf23 6 points ago +6 / -0

I went to a catholic jordanian wedding a couple years ago. They all dressed normal and acted like regular people even though 1/2 that family flew in from Jordan. They could drink like catholics too lol

5
SwampMonsterJesus 5 points ago +6 / -1

And can we Catholics drink.

5
Joesf23 5 points ago +5 / -0

Haha, correct. The baptists can put the hurt on some sweet tea though ;)

2
ShhDidIAsk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Keep the pop away from the Mormons or everyone goes thirsty! (Source: am Mormon)

2
Joesf23 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lolol my wife used to work with one and a 12pk of sprite would go missing in like 2 days. No booze, gambling,or caffeine. We know you all have a crutch with something ;)

1
ShhDidIAsk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup. I knew and worked with a life-long member of the Church before I converted, and she wouldn't dream of drinking a cup of coffee, but she would go through 4 bottles of Dr. Pepper in an 8 hour shift.

4
CuomoisaMassMurderer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Irish Catholics take that prize! I'm thinking the whole IRA violence thing might be at least partially related?

3
Joesf23 3 points ago +3 / -0

As an irish/german blooded catholic I can concur that beer, whiskey, and wine are consumed in mass quantity at family functions lol.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought mass consumables came from France?

Now I'm so confused ...

4
slaphappy2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh good grief Charlie Brown...yes, it is theoretically possible that the character represented by that image could be a Christian - or maybe even a Zoroastrian. /s

1
NoCoupForYou 1 point ago +1 / -0

All Jordanians are Palestinian. The Brits gave 3/4 of Palestine to Levantine Arabs.

2
RegularAmerican 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are they? I know alot of them are. I know it's like the same ethnicity but I'm not sure where these people get their national identities from.

1
NoCoupForYou 1 point ago +1 / -0

90% of Jordanians identify as "Palestinian" (aka Levantine Arabs before 1964 when the KGB invented it via their Cairo, Egypt-born and Raised "Agent Aref" aka Yassir Arafat).

-2
doug2 -2 points ago +2 / -4

Yet atheists dont murder you every chance they get like animals.

11
NoCoupForYou 11 points ago +11 / -0

They will sterilize you and throw you in gulags though when they get really into an -ism.

5
Johnfox13 5 points ago +5 / -0

You said Christian, did you mean Easter Worshipper?*

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not until tomorrow ;)

0
MrEvangelon1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Praise Ishtar.

0
Dessert_Eagle 0 points ago +1 / -1

If St. Joseph and Mary were around today, they'd be monitired closely at airports.

19
arebee 19 points ago +20 / -1

As of 40 minutes these comments are really fucking weird and out of place. Look at people arguing but not really saying anything.

It looks like shills in fighting, saying things “maga” people say.

5
Johnfox13 5 points ago +6 / -1

Trying out machine learning bots? Eh wouldn’t be surprised

-1
Liberty_Prime -1 points ago +2 / -3

Islam. Can point out several accounts that have been suspect for months.

6
Chongald_Xrump 6 points ago +7 / -1

Gender dysphoria is a psychological condition. But just because you might feel as if you're a different sex doesn't mean I experience you that way. If I experience you as being a jackass, I'm going to treat you like a jackass.

7
cryptoa 7 points ago +8 / -1

Its a mental disorder, I would say akin to anorexia or bulimia.

big difference is that you don't tell those people that yes they are fat and then sow their stomachs shut so they don't get "fat".

People who suffer from real gender dysphoria should be given proper treatment to find the root cause of their mental disorder. Odds are its some sort of traumatic event in their life.

Transgender are not real, its a dangerous political movement.

3
regollyek 3 points ago +4 / -1

Similar to coronaivrus, can dig up studies from 20 years ago before transtrenders became a fad.

Schizophrenia is abnormally common among the trans community and surprise surprise... around 20% of those with schizophrenia have "gender delusions".

1
cryptoa 1 point ago +2 / -1

As well as suicide.

All the hallmarks of a mental disorder, but the WHO and the rest of the medical community played politics instead of medicine.

But transgender is a political movement.

Gender Dysphoria=real mental disorder Transgender is political movement that latched unto LGB to give itself protection and has been pushing its destructive agenda hard ever since Odummy got into office.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +3 / -1

Just like Islam.

5
wrongkindofimmigrant 5 points ago +8 / -3

I have to confess that this really hits home. I have (had?) a friend who is a balding neckbeard. We would disagree about politics, but it's fine. At least he was pro-gun ownership. Found out he "hates" trump, and I haven't talked to him in a year and a half. I wonder how that Biden vote is coming along.

100% accurate smiling wojak.

5
Joesf23 5 points ago +8 / -3

I know a "libertarian" who is politically bi-polar like most of them are. Talks about small government and owning guns in one sentence then hated trump and his policies because of his stance on border security and trade policies. Tried to explain to him that leaving the border open to the 3rd world and letting multi national corporations plunder the nation would lead to 3rd world communism hellhole. Dude would short out and start rambling on about muh free markets and defunding the cops. Made no fucking sense.

5
wrongkindofimmigrant 5 points ago +6 / -1

The brainwashing is real. This year has been quite eye-opening in terms of identifying people I can trust. Some people I know personally and professionally I had thought were pretty sharp turned out to be complete zombies.

Thankfully there are a good bunch who are reliable. It's a mess.

1
Joesf23 1 point ago +2 / -1

The covid thing really screwed with some of the "conservatives". They gladly tossed out all common sense and fell into a post 9/11 mentality where they were so terrified the only thing they would believe is their TV and not their own judgement. A mess is an understatement lol

0
PatriotsUnite1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

what is the right kind of immigrant?

2
MrEvangelon1 2 points ago +3 / -1

The correct type of immigrant is the one who gets angry when others are given a free entry pass while they had to go through a years-long procedure.

1
anishr 1 point ago +2 / -1

The immigrant who loves the American flag more than the typical California libtard. An immigrant who has a hard working mentality that also loves God, his family, and puts America first. Just like Italians, Irish, Koreans, Indians who are Hindu, etc.

3
regollyek 3 points ago +4 / -1

People can rationalize weird shit. I have a similar friend.

Claims to be libertarian, very "leave me alone" and he thinks the best route to being left alone is with Biden because Trump won't be in the news all the time, lul.

2
Joesf23 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oof 🤦‍♂️ ...did he ever consider not watching the corporate CCP owned media?? Lol I swear these people cannot be helped

0
MrEvangelon1 0 points ago +2 / -2

Better explanation:

The USA is a corporation. Should businesses be able to refuse service?

If not, then open the borders.

If so, then immigration policy stands.

2
Joesf23 2 points ago +3 / -1

If we are a business for profit we cannot be a charity/welfare state as well. Take away the goody bags from uncle sam (ie the sugar cubes) and 65% of the illegal immigration (army of ants after the sugar) goes away over night. Open borders + welfare state = collapse of society.

1
MrEvangelon1 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wow...you really do know libertarians...lol

1
GODwins76 1 point ago +2 / -1

Same, know a neckbearded lolbertarian. This meme is so true except the guy pretends to be Christian. He did it his whole life, doesn't go to church, went hard fundamentalist, never preached outside the idea of jazzing up the look and doing it because someone criticized him from not being as religious as he once said he was. Doesn't talk about God at all, and when you sparked up conversation about God around him he got very quiet. He took me out for lunch awhile ago and we had a trans (a man) making our sandwiches. When we got home he couldn't stop talking about the beautiful trans who made us sandwiches. I had to inform him it was a man.

He was so picky about who he is seen with, but when he is as desperate as he is, he would probably fuck a tranny/dude.

5
anon09 5 points ago +7 / -2

nothing that dawkins, or sagan, or degrasse tyson have ever told anybody comes with any proof

3
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 3 points ago +5 / -2

Degrasse Tyson is fucking retarded. He is Bill Nye levels of phony.

1
anon09 1 point ago +2 / -1

he should write children's fiction, he'd be good at it

0
Liberty_Prime 0 points ago +3 / -3

Don't confuse evidence with proof.

0
anon09 0 points ago +1 / -1

have you heard the claims they've made?

0
Liberty_Prime 0 points ago +3 / -3

Yes.

Some, like Astrophysics claims are very plausible.

Other shit is just wild unprovable bullshit

3
anon09 3 points ago +4 / -1

data is one thing, but what these guys do is tell stories

0
anon09 0 points ago +1 / -1

also, I'm not the jackass downvoting everyone, just wanna say!

-1
Liberty_Prime -1 points ago +1 / -2

?

I'm not a green bovine with antlers...just wanna say.

0
anon09 0 points ago +1 / -1

just don't want you under the impression I'm downvoting you every time you reply to me

-1
Liberty_Prime -1 points ago +1 / -2

Ah. Ty.

-1
doug2 -1 points ago +2 / -3

lmao really? It must be hard to be so fucking ignorant

0
anon09 0 points ago +2 / -2

tell me all about how dumb I am :D

3
Moebius 3 points ago +4 / -1

Libtards...funny...

2
seilgu 2 points ago +13 / -11

The Proof of God is creation: DNA, RNA, The Big Bang, Fine-Tuning and it only gets worse and worse for atheists. Proper function requires mind and intentionality.

5
anon09 5 points ago +9 / -4

why do the sun and moon even exist? and why do all plant life literally bend themselves around through out the day to follow the sun? its almost like God left reminders for us all over the place what its all about.

-4
doug2 -4 points ago +3 / -7

What are we babylonian sun worshippers? Wait, don't answer that. Btw, science has known the answer to the plant question for decades.

8
anon09 8 points ago +9 / -1

is that what you got from my comment? to worship the sun like a plant?

5
anon09 5 points ago +6 / -1

and yes, I know, plants need sun to live. this is a bit over your head, I guess.

3
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 3 points ago +4 / -1

He isnt asking how, but why.

Its a philosophical question, not a scientific one.

Don't be a smooth brain. You can do better.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +7 / -11
-6
buckfoomers -6 points ago +7 / -13

None of that requires a god. "Fine-tuning" is a particularly hilarious one, since if you were teleported to a random location in the universe you'd fucking die. Guaranteed.

9
anon09 9 points ago +11 / -2

here comes the raging atheist who finds himself in every religious thread, woooo! prove that theory of yours buckfoomers.

-4
doug2 -4 points ago +2 / -6

It's fucking sticky retard

5
anon09 5 points ago +6 / -1

and everyone knows that you have to leave a reply in stickies

6
newfaggot 6 points ago +9 / -3

Evolution faggots dont want to admit that a complete dinosaur has never been discovered. The dinosaurs you see on display in Museums are nothing more than plaster and complete works of fiction.

This asshole paid 32 million dollars for a plaster T-Rex that was never actually removed from the ground.

Some bitch and her husband found some odd shaped rocks in 1822 and unscientifically claimed they were teeth. Meaning, dinosaurs were first thought up in the fictional world and in 1841 British scientist Richard Owen came to realize that such fossils were distinct from the teeth or bones of any living creature, but then some other asshole "discovered" the first dinosaur in 1854. It's laughable. Plus no ancient society ever mentions discovering dinosaur bones, though they should have be tripping over all of the skeletons if they really did exist in the numbers that we are being told.

Like everything in the 60 years, dinosaur bones are manufactured in fucking China. Honk Honk, centipedes, you've been sold on yet another lie.

Further explanation:

-4
buckfoomers -4 points ago +2 / -6

Point me to the fossil bunnies alongside dinosaurs, please. And please point out how the basic premises of evolution, that offspring are not always the same as the parent(s) and that things better at surviving will reproduce more, are incorrect, then claim your Nobel prize and go down in history.

1
newfaggot 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's survival of the fittest. Not evolution. If we didn't have a welfare state America would be the same way.

-1
buckfoomers -1 points ago +2 / -3

Survival of the fittest is the second thing I stated there. So now if you agree that offspring are not always the same as the parent(s), that is, mutations and sexual reproduction occur, then you do believe in evolution.

1
newfaggot 1 point ago +3 / -2

Whats funny is no one in the atheist movement ever wants to admit the both Albert Einstein and Charles Darwin both married their first cousin. Men so smart, they decided to keep it in the family. Honk Honk, pede, Honk Honk.

https://blogs.ancestry.com/cm/9-famous-people-who-married-their-cousins/

1
buckfoomers 1 point ago +4 / -3

Oh boy, if you're complaining about cousin-level incest you really don't want to read the bible.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
newfaggot 1 point ago +2 / -1

No. I am bringing it up because no one wants ever mention it.

-1
buckfoomers -1 points ago +3 / -4

Whatever, it's not for me, but it doesn't impact their scientific contributions at all.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
anon09 4 points ago +6 / -2

and quite literally all of that requires a God. you've yet to explain to anyone how nothing can create everything. I assume today isn't the day either, right? just rage out and downvote, call me some names, and move on.

-3
doug2 -3 points ago +3 / -6

It absolutely doesn't require a god. And it especially doesn't require your murderous sun god and his zombie son.

6
anon09 6 points ago +7 / -1

ok doug, go masturbate or something

0
GODwins76 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why does a God absolutely require a sun or a zombie son?

-4
buckfoomers -4 points ago +2 / -6

Who says nothing created everything? It'd make more sense to say energy and matter were the eternal constants than to make up a thing that we can't have evidence for that makes these things we know and all agree exist.

6
anon09 6 points ago +7 / -1

you do, you say it all the time, maybe you're not aware of what you're saying? so you think energy created the universe? lol... you can't just call that energy God?

-5
buckfoomers -5 points ago +2 / -7

If you want to call energy god then sure, but that's absolutely not what the god of christianity is asserted to be.

4
anon09 4 points ago +5 / -1

well, I would ask why you refuse to acknowledge that that energy could have been sentient...? it would had to have been, no?

3
anon09 3 points ago +4 / -1

ok, so in your universe... a little bit of random energy just formed itself into existence, and created the universe?

0
buckfoomers 0 points ago +2 / -2

No, why would it have been?

1
Porkbut 1 point ago +2 / -1

Any proof of that positive claim? Quite the assertion, that it cant be Christian God, seems like that sort of extraordinary claim should be supported by facts.

0
buckfoomers 0 points ago +3 / -3

Energy doesn't do the whole host of anthropomorphic things the christian god does.

4
anon09 4 points ago +5 / -1

also, do you not believe in entropy? you think things are getting bigger and better over time? you think we turned from fish to monkeys, to people?

-7
buckfoomers -7 points ago +2 / -9

You realize how vast the universe is and how much energy there is to go around? And please, get a high school education.

3
anon09 3 points ago +4 / -1

I don't think you realize how vast it is @[email protected] and please, I'm college educated and run a business.

-4
buckfoomers -4 points ago +2 / -6

So vast it's an absurdity to say it's "fine-tuned" and made for humanity, yeah.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's not the theory though. Hopefully you're not so ignorant as that yet still opining.

-1
buckfoomers -1 points ago +2 / -3

That is consistent with the big bang theory, if that's what you're referring to as the theory. It's about the rapid expansion of a singularity, not the universe coming into existence from nothing. Where'd the singularity come from, then, is your problem. It's more reasonable to assume this singularity always existed, as reasonably as "always" is in such a state, than to say the singularity was made by a singularity-maker that's always existed.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +2 / -1

There is no theory that's become widely accepted that states said singularity always existed.

Your opinions about comparative reasonableness don't really factor into it.

0
buckfoomers 0 points ago +2 / -2

https://books.google.com/books?id=fp9wrkMYHvMC&pg=PA211

This was widely accepted enough to make it to the citations on wikipedia, so that's looking pretty good.

-2
seilgu -2 points ago +6 / -8

Jesus wept, you're too stupid to know what fine-tuning is, but you think you can carry out a philosophical argument? You're a shallow bigot using small words you don't understand in an impotently one-size-fits-all manner, which is a symptom of Classical Narcissism. Pity that having said issue makes you incapable of realizing that you need treatment.

-1
buckfoomers -1 points ago +7 / -8

Nothing's more narcissistic than thinking the entire universe was created for you.

5
anon09 5 points ago +7 / -2

it was created for ungrateful pigmies like you too though

0
seilgu 0 points ago +6 / -6

An accidental collection of atoms can't "think", retard. LMAO are you really this stupid? Try again little pigeon.

-3
Klown_Schwab -3 points ago +1 / -4

The many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics negates the significance of the fine-tuning argument.

-2
seilgu -2 points ago +2 / -4

You can't interpret quantum mechanics without fine-tuning. Also, the BGV theorem negates the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Try again little pigeon.

2
jsphere256 2 points ago +3 / -1

Now do the virus

1
Quixotic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is it a Saudi though

1
tiredofwinning2020 1 point ago +2 / -1

To be fair, I have a hard time believing either of those 2 things. People can’t change their sex, and I don’t know that god (at least the god people think they know) is a real thing.

1
NoFucks2Give 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ummmmmm...

.....Allah is not real.

Some reason you chose a raghead to say God is real? Cuzzzzzz.....their god ain’t real. FYI.

1
shadypollster 1 point ago +1 / -0

God is real.

1
juststraight 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a generalization. I guarantee you that there are people who ask for proof that don't believe genders can be changed just because how you look is changed. This post is implying only people who agree with transgenders ask for proof which is a lie.

1
Lockdown106 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s some Junji Ito shit right there

0
SrzlyYUGEguacbowl 0 points ago +2 / -2

God is not of the world and therefore is not material, so since you can't count/cut/disect something that's not material you can't prove or disprove God. Science is just a byproduct of the world that God created, and God is outside of the box that is this universe.

We can still infer from reason though that God exists, for example the first cause argument. Your parents had parents and their parents had parents and their parents had parents...you can go on forever with that chain of parents and without a first cause to that chain of parents you have what is called infinite regress so the answer to what caused the first parents? God, the first cause, a necessary being who is both essence and existence and does need a cause himself.

Which to you sounds more ridiculous? A sudden and random "bang" that made the universe just spontaneously appear into existence or an all perfect all powerful all present all knowing all good God that was the first cause of this universe?

0
Pearls_Swine 0 points ago +1 / -1

What sounds more ridiculous: Living cells that evolve and continue to do so.

Or a magical man in the sky that you can't see, hear, or otherwise observe who magically waved his wand and we materalized out of thin air.

The concept of god is illogical and the concept of a Christian god is just retarded.

1
SrzlyYUGEguacbowl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you even read my comment with non-bias?

Please, I'm actually interested to hear your points as to how the concept of God is "illogical" and "retarded" give something to work with here. I wrote a well thought out argument as to why God exists...and you rebuttal with some unintelligent and vulgar remark with absolutely no substance.

Humor me please! There must be something in that brain of yours!

0
Pearls_Swine 0 points ago +1 / -1

Its called evolution, sweetheart. The big bang theory and evolution have much more scientific support than a magical fairy.

But you aren't interested in that lol. You want to ask bad faith, pretentious questions so as to confirm your gay little preconceptions about atheists.

And your argument that there must be a God because there has to be a creator is hardly an intelligent argument, but from where you're standing, it definitely would seem that way 😉

1
SrzlyYUGEguacbowl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Evolution is a theory that unknowingly lives inside the argument from design. The argument from design states that everything was intricately designed by a designer, God, whether it be the sun, the human heart, the trees, your brain (what a shame that you're putting it to waste). Things that are "fit" or "successful" through natural selection (i.e. evolution) is based on the notion of design. Natural selection does not create the "fit" it only selects the fit, in other words Darwin's theory of evolution is only possible in a world where the beings that have evolved were designed to come into existence in the first place. The idea that a big bang made grey matter "pop" into existence is laughable. Grey matter is a product, receiving its existence from the action of something before it. It's a circular argument used to prop up the theory of evolution.

Your argument has absolutely no substance, it reminds me of a crying baby who is too young to understand why they've pooped their pants so all they can manage to do is speak gibberish and scream.

I'll leave you with one quote

"One of the frustrations the ashiest has to face is to experience the innocence of a baby's face or the splendor of a nighttime sky and then have no one to thank for it"

-1
Pearls_Swine -1 points ago +1 / -2

So basically, "nah, god did it" is your argument. Cool, bruh.

"One of the frustrations the ashiest has to face is to experience the innocence of a baby's face or the splendor of a nighttime sky and then have no one to thank for it"

That's a concept feeble minded sheep like you don't get. We have accepted the fact that we don't know everything, and we don't need to know everything, and we're content with that. You thinking you don't know all the answers kills you inside. Your ego would never allow that.

You sound like a petulant child that can't fucking stand coming to terms with the fact that Santa Claus doesn't exist lol. Enjoy worshipping your invisible fairy.

0
Johnfox13 0 points ago +3 / -3

“A woman shall not wear man’s clothing, nor shall a man put on a woman’s clothing; for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God.” Deuteronomy 22:5

0
VLADIMIRPUTIN 0 points ago +1 / -1

This is one of the most dumb rebuttals of all times because all it shows is that you don't even know Christianity 101.

0
DonttrustChina 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nah, too high a chance a guy who looks like that is Muslim, a liberal wouldn't dare argue with him.

0
mushmouf 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dude the wig has the tag on it! hahahahahahha!

0
20MagnusKonrad20 0 points ago +1 / -1

To even consider otherwise is blasphemy. That's their goal - to control a person by means of pressure so that they don't even think about questioning.

0
POKEMONGO 0 points ago +1 / -1

a globalist wet dream

0
ghost_of_aswartz 0 points ago +1 / -1

Vaginas are just a bigoted construct of the patriarchy

0
MrEvangelon1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Using a Muslim or Jew to trigger more with the meme.

Good job.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

We're all content to let adults be as delusional as they want.

What's at issue is the extent of our participation in their delusion.

-1
slowmotrin -1 points ago +1 / -2

The left tossed early 2010's style atheism under the bus because they didn't like feminism, and they decided to create their own religion based on radical humanism mixed with some level of scientific inquiry. I hardly hear any leftists anymore talking about atheism or how bad God is, they created their own.

-32
buckfoomers -32 points ago +10 / -42

I like how these memes are just self-owns. Fuck your god and fuck trannies (not literally).

30
chris82tk 30 points ago +34 / -4

Why are atheists so angry all the time?

14
War_Hamster 14 points ago +15 / -1

Because atheism is a logical fallacy.

They claim you can't "prove" the existence of God.

At the same time, they can't "prove" that God doesn't exist.

I can accept an agnostic who simply doubts, but knows they can't prove one side or the other, because that's a rational position.

0
Bel-6863 0 points ago +3 / -3

Its all a fallacy to control Man. We Are God, non above, non below. We are All parts of The Source of The Universe. It is What makes Us Be. Why We are here, and what We are doing.

Peel back the layers of Life its self One will See. For the first Time. We are All connected, though Time/Space and Eternity. We are Creator Beings, little finger prints of The Source. Learning, finding, seeking, expanding The Universe....every step of the way.

But yes think "Your god" "your choice" is better than the other......hahahaha.

-1
FLYWHEEL_PRIME -1 points ago +2 / -3

Doubt is a natural part of human existence and in my opinion, the greatest of all the temptations.

-1
CuomoisaMassMurderer -1 points ago +1 / -2

Whatever is not of Faith is sin.

2
GODwins76 2 points ago +3 / -1

Doubt is a healthy and rational thought/feeling. Claims like 'all faith or all sin' are extremely dangerous though.

-1
CuomoisaMassMurderer -1 points ago +2 / -3

You are obviously misunderstanding the statement as it doesn't contradict yours.

13
TommyLasordasBallBag 13 points ago +15 / -2

Because they lack Devine purpose in life and hate that those who have it are genuinely happier and more successful.

-3
Bel-6863 -3 points ago +5 / -8

Interesting. I dont believe in god, Ive always believed My Self. Ive accomplished more things in my life than 85% of ppl here. And certainly more than my peers and friends.

Finding Purpose and Reason has Zero to do w ones beliefs. Being a follower, will always hinders Ones path.

3
TommyLasordasBallBag 3 points ago +6 / -3

You do not need to be religious to be moral, but most religious people are moral. Morality promotes accountability. Accountability promotes success. Success promotes happiness. I'm not saying you need religion to achieve this.

2
Bel-6863 2 points ago +4 / -2

Indeed. But you are using Your stance as a Moral high ground, and looking down on Others, as if they are wrong.

Self Righteous does not equal Morality. And thats where most followers of religion fall. "My god is better than your god, because this book as so". "Only my book was writtren by the one true god" (yet they are all written by Man.)

So.....what is morality? When one follows the words of Other men? Morality comes from the True Self, no words can make it.

2
TommyLasordasBallBag 2 points ago +3 / -1

Against angry athiests. Non religious and athiest are two different things. Athieism is non religious coupled with disdain and hostility towards religion

1
Bel-6863 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes. So you proved my point. You are Self Righteous not Moral.

5
QuickMaths 5 points ago +6 / -1

Because they all think they're some kind of genius who has solved the mysteries of the universe and want to "free the masses" of the shackles of religion. Except they really don't know anything and are usually miserable sons of bitches who want to lash out at people who are happier than them.

1
Porkbut 1 point ago +2 / -1

Bingo

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
seilgu 1 point ago +4 / -3

Atheism: when being gay isn't enough to get noticed.

2
Tardigrade 2 points ago +3 / -1

Its pointing out an inconsistancy/hypocrisy. I think level-headed people of all persuasions can appreciate that.

-1
buckfoomers -1 points ago +3 / -4

Yes, but it also points out the hypocrisy of the religious guy there if he doesn't buy into the tranny stuff. Hence the self-own.

-19
BasicKekinomics -19 points ago +4 / -23

You can prove that a trannie is a man.

You can't prove that God doesn't exist.

It's not a parallel argument because there is no "faith" required to know the true gender of xir.

-2
buckfoomers -2 points ago +3 / -5

You can't prove your god exists. You need faith to believe your god exists, and you need faith to believe a tranny is what it says it is.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nobody has enough faith to believe a tranny is what it says it is, lol

0
buckfoomers 0 points ago +2 / -2

Man, I wish I had your faith in that assertion.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol those who assert "trans women are women" and such nonsense don't have the conviction to believe anything, they're just sheeple desperate for acceptance, same as all the rest of the LGBBQ nonsense.

1
GlockArm 1 point ago +3 / -2

You couldn't even fuck a tranny fella. Too much impotent rage.

-1
buckfoomers -1 points ago +2 / -3

I couldn't, but because I wouldn't be able to get it up looking at a tranny, let alone thinking of what those flesh wounds are. Eugh.

0
Celtic_Warrior 0 points ago +7 / -7

You won’t be saying your blasphemies when God sends you down straight to hell with all the rest of them. You still have time to repent and put your faith in Christ.

0
buckfoomers 0 points ago +7 / -7

Sure, buddy, your imaginary friend will really beat me up.

3
christianknight 3 points ago +4 / -1

he wont beat you up but over time it just makes you bitter and this is basically hell. That culminates in going to real hell.

0
Celtic_Warrior 0 points ago +4 / -4

Okay buddy. You’re not gonna get yourself out of hell by pretending it doesn’t exist. You’re haughty and arrogant just like all the others of your sort.

“Getting beat up” will be the least of your worries.

0
Pearls_Swine 0 points ago +2 / -2

"You're haughty and arrogant"

Says the guy that thinks he figured out which religion is the true one, what God does and thinks, and where people go after they die. It must be nice knowing all of life's mysteries and telling people what will happen to them - of course, only after they die.

0
Celtic_Warrior 0 points ago +1 / -1

These aren’t mysteries and simply sharing the truth of God’s divine word does not make one arrogant. I’m not relying on my own authority like an arrogant person but instead I’m relying on God’s ultimate authority.

It’s extremely arrogant, simply put, to think you know better than God and to scornfully mock individuals who rightfully tell you that hell is the place where sinners are headed to unless they get saved through the blood of Christ.

It’s the purported unbelievers who are always prideful, haughty, and arrogant; they’re the scoffers who demean and ridicule the faithful out of ignorance.

-1
buckfoomers -1 points ago +4 / -5

You're not going to live after death by pretending your consciousness can exist outside your brain.

2
Celtic_Warrior 2 points ago +3 / -1

Earthly death is nothing in comparison to spiritual death. Your god-given conscious continues for eternity.

0
buckfoomers 0 points ago +4 / -4

I don't suppose you'd have any evidence for that assertion?

2
Celtic_Warrior 2 points ago +4 / -2

That’s a rhetorical question. That’s like seeing a painting and asking for evidence of there being a painter.

Creation = creator

Consciousness can only come from our creator. The fizz and chemicals in your brain do not produce truth and consciousness.

0
Pearls_Swine 0 points ago +2 / -2

Exactly. The left does this all the fucking time and they're too fucking smug and stupid to even realize it. An example being when they equate pro-life to the death penalty, but they are the ones making those two the same.