Why is your interpretation more valid than mine? And you'd think an all-powerful being would at least be able to inspire a text that's a lot more convincing.
It is convincing, you just choose not to understand it. In this case, there is no room for interpretation. I'm not sure if the origin of the casting of the stones phrase was never properly explained to you or maybe you never actually read the Bible, but the basis of your argument was a faulty interpretation of the event, which was caused by humans.
But every time a point is made, you shift to another topic. The bottom line is that you are a sinner and therefore need God's salvation. The sooner you stop running from this, the better things will be.
There is conflict in the interpretations because humans are flawed and fallen.
But please do change the subject from you not understanding the difference between rebuke and judgement, it's quite convenient.
Why is your interpretation more valid than mine? And you'd think an all-powerful being would at least be able to inspire a text that's a lot more convincing.
It is convincing, you just choose not to understand it. In this case, there is no room for interpretation. I'm not sure if the origin of the casting of the stones phrase was never properly explained to you or maybe you never actually read the Bible, but the basis of your argument was a faulty interpretation of the event, which was caused by humans.
But every time a point is made, you shift to another topic. The bottom line is that you are a sinner and therefore need God's salvation. The sooner you stop running from this, the better things will be.
You're a mind reader now?
There's no need to read minds, it is written.