2949
Comments (282)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-7
PraiseBeToScience -7 points ago +2 / -9
  1. Nobody here did. Prove that they did. Do you not know how evidence works?

  2. Half a mile isn't far.

  3. There still no PHYSICAL evidence of any kind of explosive. None whatsoever. Literally zero. You think hearing a 'bang' automatically means lizard people from inside the hollow flat earth blew up a fucking bomb?

That's why conspiracy theorists are fucked in the brain. You people have something wrong in your head that has malformed your ability to think critically whatsoever.

0
SurfingUSA 0 points ago +1 / -1

You can find reports that there were multiple explosions before the "crash" and that the biggest explosion was heard from more than a mile away. (Not just a "half mile," my bad.)

Here is the discussion here and the analysis of the photo:

https://patriots.win/p/11QlFjmQZU/omg-the-accident--pooler-police-/

-1
PraiseBeToScience -1 points ago +2 / -3

"Reports". LOL.

Sure, you can find reports that Trump colluded with Russia too.

His car was involved with a violent collision and crashed into the exposed fuel drum on the side of the flatbed truck. A shitload of fuel combusting can cause a boom.

You are literally opting to believe 'evidence' that was sourced from absolutely nowhere, by anyone, with any evidence.

Where are the video recordings "a mile away" catching this explosion?

1
fac1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't you think an explosion going off in his car could cause the truck behind it to crash into it?

And even if there were no explosive, the other drivers could have hit him intentionally.

It would be too big of a coincidence with the timing of when this happened for it to not have been a political hit job.