2832
Comments (343)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
41
ProphetOfKek 41 points ago +46 / -5

England has always been cucked. They got out of a monarchy under Cromwell. As soon as he died, they went and begged for for another king.

13
deleted 13 points ago +23 / -10
29
2016TrumpMAGA 29 points ago +33 / -4

You utter moron.

King Edward I of England expelled all Jews from England on 18 July 1290.

The Bank of England was devised by Charles Montagu, 1st Earl of Halifax (Church of England), to finance the rebuilding of its naval fleet. Its first governor was John Houblon, an elder in the French Protestant Church of London.

Jews didn't enter into it until 1826 when Nathan Mayer Rothschild loaned it a bunch of gold.

3
Shroudedf8 3 points ago +16 / -13

Didn't you know? It's always the joos! Pretty soon someone is gonna blame the joos for killing Jesus!

21
ThePatriot_2021 21 points ago +24 / -3

Well, they did.

12
BigBobbyB 12 points ago +17 / -5

I kinda, almost, get your point, but the jews actually DID kill Jesus.

4
King5150 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sarcasm is often lost in forums...thanks for the laughs. and maybe a /s at the end for the spurgs to compute. 👌‍‍

4
deleted 4 points ago +7 / -3
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
1
GeneralBoobs 1 point ago +1 / -0

So does everybody else. Take you now for instance.

5
ProphetOfKek 5 points ago +5 / -0

William III was responsible for allowing the Bank of England to happen. Never would have been possible if the cucked Brits hadn’t begged for another monarchy.

5
MSG1000 5 points ago +7 / -2

Bank of England. That means it was the Sabbatean Frankists.

9
2016TrumpMAGA 9 points ago +12 / -3

You colossal cretin.

The Bank of England was established in 1694. The Sabbatean Frankists weren't a thing until the mid 1700s. Their 'messiah,' Jacob Frank, wasn't even born until 1726.

1
MSG1000 1 point ago +1 / -0

You complete and utterly ignorant dunce, Sabbatean Frankists are just the most recent term for them.

 

Before Frank there was Zevi, who lived from 1626 - 1676. https://infogalactic.com/info/Sabbatai_Zevi

 

And his movement was just another form of the Cult of the All-Seeing Eye.

2
ScareCraze 2 points ago +3 / -1

You reap what you sow.

3
J0shua 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m sorry but that’s just wrong.

0
ProphetOfKek 0 points ago +2 / -2

Nothing I said was factually wrong.

6
J0shua 6 points ago +8 / -2

Celebrating Cromwell’s Tyranny isn’t a good look. Especially since once we got rid of monarchies in Europe, what a surprise, their nations became godless and the white race has been on a decline numerically and morally.

6
ScullyMully 6 points ago +6 / -0

Oliver Cromwell

All is not well with Ireland yet. You gave us the money, you gave us the guns. But let me tell you that every house in Ireland is a house of prayer, and when I bring these fanatical Irish before the muzzles of my guns, they hold up in their hands a string of beads, and they never surrender.

3
WowStrongWinning 3 points ago +6 / -3

England and Northern Europe were already going that way when they rode off into the sunset with the heretic Martin Luther.

2
Junionthepipeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

European people cant be trusted with democracy

1
Smurfection 1 point ago +3 / -2

Eastern Europe doesn't have monarchies. Almost every country in Western Europe does though and we're supposed to politely pretend, their monarchies have no power and are just for tourists. In reality, the monarchies and aristocracies have been plotting a return to power since the end of WWII and simply couldn't do it with pro democracy Americans ruling the free world by accident.

-2
ProphetOfKek -2 points ago +2 / -4

He was less tyrannical than the monarchies. I don’t particularly care if celebrating him “isn’t a good look”.