46
Comments (39)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
JoeBidensDementia1 4 points ago +5 / -1

If he hasn't been a police officer for years, then he's forgotten what it's like nowadays to be one.

Got it now?

1
LesboPregnancyScare 1 point ago +2 / -1

u/cuomoisamassmurderer is a agitator shill, likely from reddit AHS. I wish .win allowed user tags because I have a few users I would tag so I know not to read anything they say.

3
DoIMAGAYouHornyBaby 3 points ago +3 / -0

And reported for being a shill. Gotta get the libtards off. (Not you lesbo, the cuomo libtard)

2
LesboPregnancyScare 2 points ago +2 / -0

u/cuomoisamurderer probably also thinks Fauci, who has been an administrator for 20+ years, knows anything about healthcare. "well he has been in the healthcare business for 35 years, right? right?"

2
JoeBidensDementia1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, but that username...

/s

-2
CuomoisaMassMurderer -2 points ago +0 / -2

Agitate against swallowing bullshit, yes.

Since you don't like critical thought, you should avoid what I say like the plague.

0
LesboPregnancyScare 0 points ago +1 / -1

lol, whatever you think, shill. when should we expect the imminent CP posts to start?

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're just a lying pervert.

-2
CuomoisaMassMurderer -2 points ago +0 / -2

He's been a Police Officer for 35 years, longer than anyone else in Minnedishu. He doesn't forget Academy, let alone his first year on the job.

1
JoeBidensDementia1 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's not been a police officer for 35 years. He's been a detective for most of that. That's not the same thing.

-2
CuomoisaMassMurderer -2 points ago +1 / -3

It was plainly stated and established in the trial that he has been a Police officer the whole time. The only reason it's only 35 years is because he worked outside of Minneapolis for his first 4 years or so.

He's a Lieutenant. His job includes supervising and training everyone under him. He directs detectives.

Expecting that he's irrelevant because he doesn't know what he's doing will only disappoint you. Defense exposing that he LIED about one of the most important aspects of the case is something I'm hoping for, and that it results in everything he said being disregarded by the jury. That's legitimately hard for them to do considering his testimony was the last thing they heard before the weekend, and it may be weeks before the defense can address it. By that time it may be "baked into the pie."

I don't know if this amounts to legitimate good strategy by the prosecution, or if this is the corrupt injustice we all expect taking form.