This is my basic point, it's a tough case. Everybody seems to think it's open and shut, on both sides. I can understand having strong opinions for almost a year with no new evidence, but evidence is coming out now.
I hope everything this LT said gets thrown out based on the "maximal restraint" they had GF in being in their manual. (Assuming it is) if LT is willing to straight up LIE about that, prosecution needs to establish everything he said from somebody else.
I don't think what he said will be thrown out based on 35 years of experience, more than anyone else in the city. Seems like a strange idea people here are advancing.
This is my basic point, it's a tough case. Everybody seems to think it's open and shut, on both sides. I can understand having strong opinions for almost a year with no new evidence, but evidence is coming out now.
I hope everything this LT said gets thrown out based on the "maximal restraint" they had GF in being in their manual. (Assuming it is) if LT is willing to straight up LIE about that, prosecution needs to establish everything he said from somebody else.
I don't think what he said will be thrown out based on 35 years of experience, more than anyone else in the city. Seems like a strange idea people here are advancing.