posted ago by ClintonCovfefe ago by ClintonCovfefe +10 / -1

Just wondering , not trolling , a former jew myself. I’m watching a documentary on Netflix called the accountant of auschwitz and they mentioned right wing holocaust deniers.. I’ve seen SOME anti semitism on this site but don’t give a fuck cause it’s the internet. But also just wondering why one would deny the Holocaust ? Can anybody speak on their argument ? Seems absurd to me but always down to listen

Comments (100)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Indomitable_Warrior 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolutely! I gladly deny the holohoax. And just as a preface- I don't hate Jews.

First some background info on what and why.

Holocaust means "burnt offering" and it is prophesied in orthodox Judaism that 6 million must die in order for the Jews to return to the holy land. That's where this infatuation with the '6 million' figure originates from. And if you do some searching you will find plenty of newspaper references of "6 million" Jews dying, "holocaust" etc. long before World War 2.

Here are the basic arguments against the hoax:

#1) The "gas chambers" had no trace of cyanide in the walls.

Hydrocyanic acid or Zyklon B has been chemically proven to embed itself into concrete walls with sufficient exposure time. In the delousing chambers where it was used frequently, the walls were visibly blue. Upon testing, the walls of the supposed 'gas chambers' had no detectable trace of cyanide.

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v02/v02p319_Faurisson.html

#2) No mention of 'gas chambers' in the entirety of the three best known works on WW2.

"Three of the best known works on the Second World War are General Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe (New York: Doubleday [Country Life Press], 1948), Winston Churchill's The Second World War (London: Cassell, 6 vols., 1948-1954), and the Mémoires de guerre of General de Gaulle (Paris: Plon, 3 vols., 1954-1959). In these three works not the least mention of Nazi gas chambers is to be found.

Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle's three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi "gas chambers," a "genocide" of the Jews, or of "six million" Jewish victims of the war."

#3) The International Red Cross lists the official death toll of the concentration camps at 271,301, mostly due to Typhus and starvation caused by Allied bombing of the supply lines:

https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=499483&d=$attachment[dateline]

#4) The World Almanac cites the World Jewish Population as having increased between 1940 and 1947:

World Almanac, 1940, pg. 129: World Jewish Population -- 15,319,359 World Almanac USA, 1947, pg. 748: World Jewish Population -- 15,690,000

The population of Jews living in countries pre-WW2 which would later be occupied by Germany was 2.9 million. The population of Jews living in countries occupied by Germany after WW2 was 2.4 million. In the same time period the population of Jews living in Palestine increased by 500,000. Where did the 6 million go?

#5) The Impossibility of cremating the amount of dead bodies claimed.

The Germans of World War II did not have modern crematoria and were dependent on the use of coal and a coal derivative known as coke to burn the bodies. This led to a much cooler temperature for incineration and therefore the average time for one human body to be destroyed was roughly 4-5 hours each.

Now we can do the real math concerning Auschwitz. The claim has been that that labor camp had 6 but some say 8 crematorium chambers for destroying bodies. If it takes 4-5 hours per body (lets say 4 hours) to incinerate one body, and lets say that there were 8 chambers. Then we have 6 bodies per day times 8 chambers running 24/7 nonstop (lets let the naysayers have their way here and not allow for down time for removal of residue and for maintenance of each chamber…).. then we have 48 bodies per day… And now we can take into account the time that Auschwitz was in "operation"… Some say approximately about 3.5 years maximum (mid 1941 when camp was supposedly put into operation to end of 1944 when the Soviets occupied that region of eastern Poland), and therefore the number of days is 3.5 years x 365 days x 8 crematoria x 6 bodies maximum and we achieve a figure of 61,320… and we can add one more day for 1944 being a leap year and we have 61,368.

This is the maximum possible for Auschwitz- a camp that lying propagandists want us to believe cremated 4.3 million bodies. Furthermore, there were very detailed aerial photographs taken of the camps during the war and nowhere to be seen was any sign of smoke from cremation, piles of Coke necessary to burn so many bodies, mass graves, or people lining up outside "gas chambers".

We are expected to believe that there was as much as 2000 tons of coke being used each day to cremate "millions" of bodies.

#6) The so called "testimonies" and evidence presented at the Nuremberg trial were coerced through torture and fabrication.

Former Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss was tortured by British officials into signing a false and self-incriminating "confession" that has been widely cited as a key document of Holocaust extermination. His testimony before the Nuremberg Tribunal, a high point of the proceeding, was perhaps the most striking and memorable evidence presented there of a German extermination program. Höss maintained that two and half million people had been killed in Auschwitz gas chambers, and that another 500,000 inmates had died there of other causes. No serious or reputable historian now accepts either of these fantastic figures, and other key portions of Höss' "confession" are now generally acknowledged to be untrue.

Jupp Aschenbrenner, a Bavarian who was tortured into signing a statement that he had worked on mobile gas chambers ("gas vans") during the war. It wasn't until several years later that he was finally able to prove that he had actually spent that time in Munich studying to become an electric welder.

Fritz Sauckel, head of the German wartime labor mobilization program, was sentenced to death at the main Nuremberg trial. An important piece of evidence presented to the Tribunal by the US prosecution was an affidavit signed by the defendant. (Nuremberg document 3057-PS.) It turned out that Sauckel had put his signature to this self-incriminating statement, which had been presented to him by his captors in finished form, only after he was bluntly told that if he hesitated, his wife and children would be turned over to the Soviets. "I did not stop to consider, and thinking of my family, I signed the document,"

Sauckel later declared Hans Fritzsche, another defendant in the main Nuremberg trial, was similarly forced to sign a self-damning confession while he was a prisoner of the Soviet secret police in Moscow. (Nuremberg document USSR-474.) Although most of the defendants at the main Nuremberg trial were not tortured, many other Germans were forced to sign affidavits and give testimony against their former colleagues and superiors. A simple threat to turn the subject over to the Soviets was often enough to persuade him to sign an affidavit or provide testimony needed in court. Threats against the subject's wife and children, including withdrawal of ration cards, delivery to the Soviets or imprisonment, often quickly produced the desired results. If all else failed, the subject could be placed in solitary confinement, beaten, kicked, whipped or burned until he broke down.

The testimony of the prosecution's chief witness in the Nuremberg "Wilhelmstrasse" trial was obtained by threat of death. The American defense attorney, Warren Magee, had somehow obtained the transcript of the first pretrial interrogation of Friedrich Gaus, a former senior official in the German Foreign Office. Despite frantic protests by prosecuting attorney Robert Kempner, the judge decided to permit Magee to read from the document. During the pretrial interrogation session, Kempner told Gaus that he would be turned over to the Soviets for hanging. Tearfully pleading for mercy, Gaus begged Kempner to think of his wife and children. Kempner replied that he could save himself only by testifying in court against his former colleagues. A desperate Gaus, who had already endured four weeks in solitary confinement, agreed. When Magee finished reading from the damning transcript, Gaus sat with both hands to his face, totally devastated.

Read every single case study of the Nuremberg trials here http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_Weberb.html

#7) The "Diary of Anne Frank" as well as other published works of the Holocaust have been proven fakes.

For one, Anne Frank did not actually write her own Diary! In fact a New York supreme court ruled in favor of a $50,000 settlement from Otto Frank toward an American writer Meyer Levin for his work on the "Anne Frank" diary. Furthermore she supposedly "rewrote the diary" in 1945 with a ball-point pen when ball point pens didn't exist in 1945.

Another best-selling and 'official holocaust text', Polish Jerzy Kosinski's "The painted bird" was supposedly written in English to 'free him' of the restraints of his native language. Polish professor Pawel Dudziak labeled it a clear work of fiction.

Binjamin Wilkomirski's "Fragments" is yet another 'official holocaust text' proven to be a blatant fraud. He describes gentiles in Switzerland trying to kill him and his Jews. Switzerland was neutral during the war. Knowledgeable historians like Raul Hilberg early on pegged Fragments as a fraud. It was later proven that Wilkormirski spent the ENTIRE TIME in Switzerland and did not even SET FOOT in a work camp.

Yet another book supposedly written by a "Hungarian Doctor" visiting Auschwitz via train was proven to be a fraud when it was proven the train route from Hungary to Austria supposedly used didn't even exist. Why are so many fabricated written testimonies and documents necessary to keep the hoax of the holocaust in play?

In conclusion, the entire "Holocaust" was clearly a hoax contrived in order to further the illuminati zionist agenda and demonize Hitler for standing against them. Not a single Jew was killed in a gas chamber, nor was there ever a genocidal agenda.

1
ClintonCovfefe [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a lot I’ll get to in the morning but the logic of your Auschwitz burning body count is flawed because you’re assuming a crematorium can only burn 1 person at a time. I’m willing to say without any research they could do 3-5 which means you’d have to multiply your number by 3-5 (I’m just being conservative ) and you’d get about a 240k to 300k number from Auschwitz burned bodies alone. Never mind buried bodies too. I gotta look into everything else though