"This is a hypothetical scenario designed to illustrate the public health risk communication challenges that could potentially emerge during a naturally occurring infectious disease outbreak requiring development and distribution of novel and/or investigational drugs, vaccines, therapeutics, or other medical countermeasures. The infectious pathogen, medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, and government agency responses described herein are entirely fictional."
What exactly are we supposed to be getting mad about? This is a literal LARP scenario. Completely fictional; a brain exercise to predict what may happen in the future.
Did you actually read this thing? Because I did, and this is just a thought experiment done a few years ago about how we may socially react to a virus.
There was a "war games" scenario played out by top democrats, media elites and government/military officials where they laid out the blueprint to steal the election.
Funny enough they used a 30k lead in Pennsylvania on election night disappearing as the kind of "large discrepancy" that Americans wouldn't accept as legitimate.
Imagine their fear when the real lead they had to disappear was 700k votes.
Who is "they" the author of the work of fiction? You are the one making the claim it's a mirror image to our current experience. List one identical part of the text to what has happened.
In September 2026, two months after the first batches of Corovax were released in the United States, Japan announced that it would not approve the vaccine for use in Japan due to concerns that it had not been vetted properly through full clinical trials. Preliminary Corovax trials conducted in Japan had shown that the vaccine was effective at preventing SPARS and that the incidence of immediate side effects was minimal; however, significant concerns remained about the possibility of chronic, long-term side effects based on data from the original GMI vaccine. As an alternative, the Japanese government stated that it would continue the development of an alternative SPARS vaccine, which they expected to become available in early 2027.
Japan’s refusal to accept Corovax was widely covered in the international media. The decision was particularly controversial because of widespread SPARS transmission across Japan. The fact that the Japanese government was willing to wait six or more months for another vaccine to be developed was also especially concerning to the US public. Compounding this concern was the general lack of a response to the Japanese decision from the US government. Although HHS Secretary Nagel released a short statement reiterating the safety of Corovax, the CDC, FDA, and other government agencies did not respond at all, a reflection of a longstanding tradition of not commenting on other countries’ internal public health decisions. From the public’s viewpoint, however, the lack of a response from trusted government agencies only exacerbated vaccine fears.
"They" is Ahriman's Preferred Pronoun; and this all includes the participants in the Event 201 / Global Totalitarian Coup including the Communist Party of China, Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg, the John Hopkins Center, the CDC, the United Nations Foundation, the WHO, the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, the CIA, etcetera.
Not to mention the Rothchilds, Rockefeller’s, Warburgs, Wilhelms, Vanderbilts, Duponts, Klaus Schwab, $oros.... etc etc the 1% of the 1%. Collectively they have trillions of dollars of wealth and are now bored of it.
What to do when you have everything you ever wanted, can do what you want, when you want? Buy anything, buy off practically anyone? Buy governments, votes.
Why, you decide with the rest you want the earth all to your self and figure out how to kill everyone.
Public relations concerning negative vaccine effects:
Reports of negative side effects associated with Kalocivir began gaining traction in February 2026. Despite the negative response, public health agencies continued to make progress until February, when a video of a three-year-old boy in North Carolina —who was hospitalized with SPARS and began projectile vomiting immediately after taking a dose of Kalocivir —went viral. In the video clip, the boy’s physician administers a pediatric dose of liquid Kalocivir; a few moments later, the boy begins vomiting profusely, chokes, and then faints while his mother shrieks in the background.
The social media groundswell quickly overwhelmed the capacity of local, state, and federal agencies to respond, and compliance with public health and medical recommendations dropped considerably. The FDA and other government agencies quickly attempted to remind the public that correlation does not equate to causation, and that vomiting was not a known side effect of Kalocivir. This message, while scientifically accurate, lacked appropriate empathy and failed to assuage the public’s mounting fears. As a result, it was largely ignored, and public concern continued to grow.
Literally you're quoting fucking generalizations that any fucking high school class could have come up with during a brain storming session. Fucking pathetic. Again nothing fucking specific.
Unable to identify the causative agent, officials at the Minnesota Department of Health’s Public Health Laboratory sent the patients’ clinical specimens to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), where scientists confirmed that the patients did not have influenza. One CDC scientist recalled reading a recent ProMed dispatch describing the emergence of a novel coronavirus in Southeast Asia, and ran a pancoronavirus RT-PCR test. A week later, the CDC team confirmed that the three patients were, in fact, infected with a novel coronavirus, which was dubbed the St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SPARS-CoV, or SPARS), after the city where the first cluster of cases had been identified.
I seem to have missed the part in all of this where they said you can't call it that (St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome) because it's racist against Irish people.
Lack of long-term data leads to injury, public questions vaccines as primary treatment over already proven treatments:
At the request of HHS Secretary Nagel, ASPR convened a series of meetings among senior leadership of the federal health agencies to address policy and program changes being implemented as a result of a departmental review of the response to the SPARS pandemic. Among the issues considered were the implications of growing negative public opinion regarding Corovax and the government’s perceived indifference to victims of the public health response to SPARS. One senior health official argued that time and a robust medical monitoring program for vaccine recipients—the components of which were already in place—should be sufficient to determine whether public concern about long-term effects was, in fact, warranted: “We have to wait for the data. People need to understand that fact.”
By May 2026, public interest in SPARS had begun to wane. In late April the CDC had publicized an updated case fatality rate estimate, suggesting the SPARS was only fatal in 0.6% of cases in the United States (where access to medical treatment was available). This figure matched public sentiment, widely expressed on social media, that SPARS was not as dangerous as initially thought. Combined with persisting doubts about Kalocivir and the lack of a commercially available SPARS vaccine, the new, lower case fatality rate estimate led the public to grow increasingly hostile toward continued SPARS messaging.
Healthcare workers and other sectors grow resentful for not receiving vaccination:
This plan was met with skepticism among certain groups. Doctors and nurses, for example, expressed concerns that they were not included as a priority group. In Milwaukee, healthcare providers even protested their lack of inclusion by refusing to report for work, which, in turn, prompted the Wisconsin Department of Health Services to promise that healthcare providers would be vaccinated as soon as more vaccine became available. In Republican ZapQ groups across the rest of the state, however, these protests and particularly the response from the Wisconsin Department of Health were widely reported across social media platforms as yet another example of liberal politics at work, regardless of the absence of politics or the actual content of the policy. Many Wisconsinite Republicans subsequently stopped following the news feeds and Twitter accounts of their state and local public health departments.
"This is a hypothetical scenario designed to illustrate the public health risk communication challenges that could potentially emerge during a naturally occurring infectious disease outbreak requiring development and distribution of novel and/or investigational drugs, vaccines, therapeutics, or other medical countermeasures. The infectious pathogen, medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, and government agency responses described herein are entirely fictional."
What exactly are we supposed to be getting mad about? This is a literal LARP scenario. Completely fictional; a brain exercise to predict what may happen in the future.
They did the same thing with stealing the election
Did you actually read this thing? Because I did, and this is just a thought experiment done a few years ago about how we may socially react to a virus.
You read it, did you?
what was your thought on the democratic candidate stepping down?
There was a "war games" scenario played out by top democrats, media elites and government/military officials where they laid out the blueprint to steal the election.
Funny enough they used a 30k lead in Pennsylvania on election night disappearing as the kind of "large discrepancy" that Americans wouldn't accept as legitimate.
Imagine their fear when the real lead they had to disappear was 700k votes.
"You are saying They planned the Global Totalitarian Coup before executing the Global Totalitarian Coup? ... nah, it's just a LARP, bro."
Who is "they" the author of the work of fiction? You are the one making the claim it's a mirror image to our current experience. List one identical part of the text to what has happened.
Countries recall or refuse certain vaccines:
Oh.. re your last paragraph about Japan. They just said no bueno to blood donations from folk that have had the delayed suicide shot
Japan uses Pfizer vaccine you goober.
"They" is Ahriman's Preferred Pronoun; and this all includes the participants in the Event 201 / Global Totalitarian Coup including the Communist Party of China, Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg, the John Hopkins Center, the CDC, the United Nations Foundation, the WHO, the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, the CIA, etcetera.
Not to mention the Rothchilds, Rockefeller’s, Warburgs, Wilhelms, Vanderbilts, Duponts, Klaus Schwab, $oros.... etc etc the 1% of the 1%. Collectively they have trillions of dollars of wealth and are now bored of it.
What to do when you have everything you ever wanted, can do what you want, when you want? Buy anything, buy off practically anyone? Buy governments, votes.
Why, you decide with the rest you want the earth all to your self and figure out how to kill everyone.
Public relations concerning negative vaccine effects:
The social media groundswell quickly overwhelmed the capacity of local, state, and federal agencies to respond, and compliance with public health and medical recommendations dropped considerably. The FDA and other government agencies quickly attempted to remind the public that correlation does not equate to causation, and that vomiting was not a known side effect of Kalocivir. This message, while scientifically accurate, lacked appropriate empathy and failed to assuage the public’s mounting fears. As a result, it was largely ignored, and public concern continued to grow.
Literally you're quoting fucking generalizations that any fucking high school class could have come up with during a brain storming session. Fucking pathetic. Again nothing fucking specific.
Time for some education. They use "hypotheticals" to war game real plans. They've been doing this for years. That's what you're missing.
Okay bud. Time for some education for you...fiction is fiction. Literally give me one exactly identical part of the story.
Origin of virus:
I seem to have missed the part in all of this where they said you can't call it that (St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome) because it's racist against Irish people.
Recognition of polarity in social media:
Again any fucking moron could have forseen this shit. I'm talking about specifics, not generic fucking obvious outcomes.
Identical in what way exactly?
Lack of long-term data leads to injury, public questions vaccines as primary treatment over already proven treatments:
Public grows disinterested in medical messaging:
Healthcare workers and other sectors grow resentful for not receiving vaccination: