840
Comments (73)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-4
lo_there -4 points ago +3 / -7

"This is a hypothetical scenario designed to illustrate the public health risk communication challenges that could potentially emerge during a naturally occurring infectious disease outbreak requiring development and distribution of novel and/or investigational drugs, vaccines, therapeutics, or other medical countermeasures. The infectious pathogen, medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, and government agency responses described herein are entirely fictional."

What exactly are we supposed to be getting mad about? This is a literal LARP scenario. Completely fictional; a brain exercise to predict what may happen in the future.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
lo_there 1 point ago +3 / -2

Identical in what way exactly?

3
BeetlejuiceForSenate 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lack of long-term data leads to injury, public questions vaccines as primary treatment over already proven treatments:

At the request of HHS Secretary Nagel, ASPR convened a series of meetings among senior leadership of the federal health agencies to address policy and program changes being implemented as a result of a departmental review of the response to the SPARS pandemic. Among the issues considered were the implications of growing negative public opinion regarding Corovax and the government’s perceived indifference to victims of the public health response to SPARS. One senior health official argued that time and a robust medical monitoring program for vaccine recipients—the components of which were already in place—should be sufficient to determine whether public concern about long-term effects was, in fact, warranted: “We have to wait for the data. People need to understand that fact.”