277
Comments (17)
sorted by:
17
Fignugent 17 points ago +17 / -0

nah we're not signing that, we'll just hire one of these fresh border hoppers to do your job

17
citizenpolitician [S] 17 points ago +17 / -0

then you sue the company for violation of your employment rights per the EEOC.

8
InHidingBecause 8 points ago +8 / -0

No standing, damages already done

6
Sphinx3peat 6 points ago +6 / -0

No standing, should’ve sued earier

7
1ValhallaJack 7 points ago +7 / -0

Exactly. And while you're at please train your replacement

10
Desktop 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is interesting but not practical. No company would ever sign. However, it's already illegal to force participation in drug trials. So, any company that has become so disconnected from reality that they would attempt to require employees to get a covid19 vaccine in order to retain full employment should be sued immediately.

6
chuckachookah 6 points ago +6 / -0

Someone ^ isn’t paying attention.

It is already being forwarded that corporate policies to require proof of vaccination to be served as a customer. (You can try his with masks at Starbucks and they have begun to refuse providing you your paid-for drink).

It’s all PR driven to satisfy the woke PC, but that will become corporate policy

1
Desktop 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let the lawsuits fly....

3
chuckachookah 3 points ago +3 / -0

And draw an activist judge that is probably jacking off to BLM material with their mask on in their chambers alone only to return a legally binding decision that’s filled with Neo Marxist garbage?

Yeah. Have fun with that.

7
Kmdub2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sharing this with every based person I know. Let the retard left be forced to take it for all I care

6
BBWasHere 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is incredibly weak. It gives too many outs to the company. The company should have ZERO way out of paying. Not only that, but the monetary benefits to the employee are pathetic.

If/When my company mandates I take it; First I absolutely will not and will forge whatever documents I have to or pay whatever doctors I need to. Second, I will require they pay me $10M immediately upon any symptoms and $25M upon my death to by beneficiaries. Period. The agreement won't be "if due to the treatment" it will be symptoms or death PERIOD. If you make it a condition "due to the treatment" you know damn well right now the "experts" will never blame anything on the treatment so the company won't be paying a thing.

No, the agreement will be flat out any symptom and/or death.

4
bit0101 4 points ago +4 / -0

Big hole in that contract where it specifies the ailment must start within 24 hours of vaccine administration. What happens when the damage only becomes apparent in two weeks, or 6 months? They're not liable, according to that.

2
Bonami 2 points ago +2 / -0

According to Alex Jones the symptoms will appear in most in 6 mths to a year.

His video on how this has been planned out for years also includes info on what the effects will be over time. Key words: death, infertility, brain damage. This is a must watch video

https://www.infowars.com/posts/sunday-live-globalists-planning-bigger-pandemic-to-finally-impose-new-world-order/

3
1
Bonami 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks, but the link says it is gone..

3
T20007 3 points ago +3 / -0

Whereas paragraph - it should be 'trials' not 'trails'.

Who chooses the board certified doctor?

Haven't read the rest yet.

2
BugsleyKAG 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks.