1796
Comments (456)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
CrackerJack2 -1 points ago +4 / -5

We need to raise the most PROGRAMMERS to fight against DOMINION and other vote stealing computerized voting machines, or it's game over.

14
PermaHandshake 14 points ago +17 / -3

Oh you still believe in democracy? I'm sorry.

1
plaaaa 1 point ago +1 / -0

The founding fathers had to build one.

2
plaaaa 2 points ago +3 / -1

We need judges.

1
Fabius 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need fucking white males.

Why do you retards just ignore the data? It's crystal fucking clear what America's problem is.

2
LostViking1985 2 points ago +3 / -1

You don't fight the voting machines with programmers.

You BAN electronic voting machines, and create better voter integrity laws (Photo ID, etc).

1
Fabius 1 point ago +2 / -1

Clueless.

The only way you save our country is to get rid of the non-whites. You're still not paying attention.

1
LostViking1985 1 point ago +2 / -1

I prefer the non-genocidal option. StormFront is that way ->

Ethnostate is not a realistic option.

1
randomusers239874 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not with that attitude it isn't. And creating an ethnostate doesn't require genocide; the Nazi's "first solution" was deportation, but nobody would take the people they didn't want. The US has enough political clout to force them.

1
themightykekfish 1 point ago +1 / -0

No he is right out movement is crippled from a tech standpoint.

Mechanical aptitude and gun shit we probably have an over abundance of.

We need to learn comms have drones etc

1
LostViking1985 1 point ago +1 / -0

"programmers" is being used too broadly here. comms means organizing communication devices. it has nothing to do with programming. drones means operators training to use them, and again has nothing to do with programming. if we need more based tech, then say that. programmers is a very specific term.

1
themightykekfish 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bitch did I say programmers?

-1
CrackerJack2 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Well,
that's the ultimate goal, NO COMPUTERIZED VOTING SYSTEMS.
But first you have to convince the majority in charge of voting systems of their obvious ability to be programmed to pick any winner, regardless of the People's will.

1
randomusers239874 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the wrong way; modern crypto has already solved all the current problems we have with voting. What we need is to make it cryptographically secure, and have no paper ballots. It's this in-between state where we have paper ballots, and mechanical counters, that is killing us.

1
LostViking1985 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't need more programmers for that. Do I need to become an engineer to understand why seatbelts are a good idea? No.

1
CrackerJack2 1 point ago +1 / -0

We have to be masters of these computerized systems.
We need to reprogram the current systems, by any means possible, while at the same time convince the majority that these are simply magic boxes, with 100,000s of lines of code, programmed by foreigners who worked for Dominion, and are ABSOLUTELY NOT CREDIBLE.