Well,
that's the ultimate goal, NO COMPUTERIZED VOTING SYSTEMS.
But first you have to convince the majority in charge of voting systems of their obvious ability to be programmed to pick any winner, regardless of the People's will.
This is the wrong way; modern crypto has already solved all the current problems we have with voting. What we need is to make it cryptographically secure, and have no paper ballots. It's this in-between state where we have paper ballots, and mechanical counters, that is killing us.
We have to be masters of these computerized systems.
We need to reprogram the current systems, by any means possible, while at the same time convince the majority that these are simply magic boxes, with 100,000s of lines of code, programmed by foreigners who worked for Dominion, and are ABSOLUTELY NOT CREDIBLE.
No, we have to ban these systems because they are too easily compromised. Again, this is a public awareness and policy issue, not a programming problem.
I agree that these systems are absolutely worthless.
You can show that these systems are corrupt by reprogramming them any way you want.
You need at least a couple programmers to reprogram them to demonstrate to everyone these systems are absolutely worthless.
Plus, the more programmers we have, the better we can fill our ranks and help fight off the control Silicon Valley has over the internet.
Well,
that's the ultimate goal, NO COMPUTERIZED VOTING SYSTEMS.
But first you have to convince the majority in charge of voting systems of their obvious ability to be programmed to pick any winner, regardless of the People's will.
This is the wrong way; modern crypto has already solved all the current problems we have with voting. What we need is to make it cryptographically secure, and have no paper ballots. It's this in-between state where we have paper ballots, and mechanical counters, that is killing us.
You don't need more programmers for that. Do I need to become an engineer to understand why seatbelts are a good idea? No.
We have to be masters of these computerized systems.
We need to reprogram the current systems, by any means possible, while at the same time convince the majority that these are simply magic boxes, with 100,000s of lines of code, programmed by foreigners who worked for Dominion, and are ABSOLUTELY NOT CREDIBLE.
No, we have to ban these systems because they are too easily compromised. Again, this is a public awareness and policy issue, not a programming problem.
I agree that these systems are absolutely worthless.
You can show that these systems are corrupt by reprogramming them any way you want.
You need at least a couple programmers to reprogram them to demonstrate to everyone these systems are absolutely worthless.
Plus, the more programmers we have, the better we can fill our ranks and help fight off the control Silicon Valley has over the internet.