Serious question, how hard would it be to invade and take over Mecca? I’m talking biblical conquest here. No survivors. Burn the whole place to the ground. Blow up the black cube. The works.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Serious question, how hard would it be to invade and take over Mecca? I’m talking biblical conquest here. No survivors. Burn the whole place to the ground. Blow up the black cube. The works.
That’s like stomping the anthill. Yes, you destroy the structure, but then the teeming hordes of fire ants strap on their IEDs and kill, kill, kill.
How you gonna launch anything from anywhere? You got rockets stationed overseas or are expecting our military/gov to help with all this?
So then it isn’t possible?
from a strategic standpoint, mecca is a useless target. the nearby port city of jeddah is far more valuable
in any military action, it's important to define the goal(s) of the mission. here the goal appears to be demoralization, but this could be better done by forcing homosexuality and transsexualism on their children, elevating criminals and actors to high places in society, etc.
Wait a second....
Islam isn't a religion, it's a misogynistic, religiously intolerant, deceitful, murderous cult that must be eviscerated from the face of the earth; if there is to ever be any peace for mankind.
And Islam will be around longer than western civilization at the rate we're going. Islam is right about women.
Nuke it.
I recommend the use of cobalt-salted strontium-90.
Depends on how interested you are in the morality of it and how much you fear the retaliation from probably pretty much every other country.
You're going to be in a tiny minority if you think a genocide is going to pass as moral.
Doesn't sound like you're big on free speech.
Then you're not an advocate of free speech. Words don't hurt, no matter what the words are.