It makes sense to me because Jesus said his body is bread and his blood is wine. So we should make homemade bread on honor of his body that was risen on Easter day in celebration of him. Also drink wine with the bread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
It makes sense to me because Jesus said his body is bread and his blood is wine. So we should make homemade bread on honor of his body that was risen on Easter day in celebration of him. Also drink wine with the bread.
While yeast ~ sin is commonly taught, it's absurd... I'll give a few scriptural examples:
Lev 23:17 They shall be of fine flour, and they shall be baked with leaven, as firstfruits to the Lord
Matt 13:33 “The kingdom of heaven is like leaven that a woman took and hid in three measures of flour, till it was all leavened.”
Matt 16:12 Then they understood that he did not tell them to beware of the leaven of bread, but of the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees.
If leaven were symbolically sin, it would be absolutely ludicrous to use it as a comparison to the kingdom or offer it as a first fruit... scripture aside; symbolism involves very natural straight forward observations. The most simple for leaven would be "that which causes things to rise/grow/reproduce"
While sin does reproduce, it does not cause one to rise (much the opposite).
Leaven is more closely "spirit or word"
Leaving is good for those feasts that are mentioned the first fruits and stuff however for Passover it is forbidden hence the feast of unleavened bread right before Passover. Were the Jews going clean out their houses symbolically of course of anything pertaining to yeast. Good grasp of the scriptures
Yes, I'm aware of the feast of unleavened bread, I'm just saying leaven isn't sin while acknowledging that is what is commonly taught
No it is an archetype of sin, in certain types of seasons. There's nothing wrong with yeast or leaven and in certain cases it's okay but like a play it takes on a "character" in certain feasts or celebrations. if that makes any sense {for and against}
It plays the same "character" in all the scenarios, because the symbolism doesn't change... The "changing" is just experts trying to justify their failed interpretation.